OpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.
N/A
HighQ
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
HighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.
N/A
Pricing
OpenText Documentum
Thomson Reuters HighQ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Documentum
HighQ
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Documentum
Thomson Reuters HighQ
Features
OpenText Documentum
Thomson Reuters HighQ
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
9.2
7 Ratings
13% above category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging
10.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document management
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Records management
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance
10.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated workflows
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile support
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.2
2 Ratings
5% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
9.32 Ratings
Search
00 Ratings
9.62 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.6
2 Ratings
7% above category average
Chat
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Notifications
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Discussions
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Surveys
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.
WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.