OpenText Documentum vs. Thomson Reuters HighQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Documentum
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A
HighQ
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
HighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.N/A
Pricing
OpenText DocumentumThomson Reuters HighQ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText DocumentumHighQ
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText DocumentumThomson Reuters HighQ
Features
OpenText DocumentumThomson Reuters HighQ
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
9.2
7 Ratings
13% above category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.2
2 Ratings
5% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
Search00 Ratings9.62 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.6
2 Ratings
7% above category average
Chat00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Notifications00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQ
9.4
2 Ratings
16% above category average
Versioning00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings9.22 Ratings
Advanced security features00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText DocumentumThomson Reuters HighQ
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText DocumentumThomson Reuters HighQ
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(10 ratings)
9.2
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText DocumentumThomson Reuters HighQ
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
  • Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
  • Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Document sharing. This product makes it easy to upload, review and organize documents related to a particular project or matter.
  • Permissions. Collaborate allows very granular permissions to be assigned for shared documents and administrative activities such as workflows.
  • Reliability. The product is cloud-based and rarely, if ever, unavailable.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
  • EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText
Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
  • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
  • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Permits fairly simple administration by a single person for hundreds of Extranets
  • One shop stopping for reliable, secure document sharing and signing with external parties
  • Simple enough to use that internal and external users do not need training to take advantage of the product.
Read full review
ScreenShots