OpenText Documentum vs. zeroheight

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Documentum
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A
zeroheight
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
zeroheight helps teams create, manage and maintain their design systems. Using zeroheight, designers, engineers, and product teams can collaborate and build design systems that can be easily shared across teams.
$49
month
Pricing
OpenText Documentumzeroheight
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$49
month
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Documentumzeroheight
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
OpenText Documentumzeroheight
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
9.2
7 Ratings
11% above category average
zeroheight
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Documentumzeroheight
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.9 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.9 out of 10
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Documentumzeroheight
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(10 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Documentumzeroheight
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
Read full review
zeroheight
For creating and maintaining a component library, it is a fantastic tool that creates an interface between Developers, UX Engineers and Designers. It is easy to get both general information about a component, but also incredibly detailed information when looking at the component on a pixel-level, where information on paddings, margins, colors, fonts etc. can be easily accessed.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
  • Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
  • Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.
Read full review
zeroheight
  • showcasing components and other topics
  • ease of seeing detailed information on components (colors, paddings, sizes etc.)
  • ease of finding information
  • possibility of going to previous versions of the design guideline
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
  • EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
Read full review
zeroheight
  • when opening a component image (which opens a new page where the detailed information like paddings and colors are shown), the zoom can only be done by buttons, I'd prefer to be able to use my mouse scroll and for vertical / horizontal scrolling to do ctrl+scroll or ctrl+shift+scroll or something like that
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
Read full review
zeroheight
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText
Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
Read full review
zeroheight
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
Read full review
zeroheight
I have used and still use Sketch and Zeplin too, but they serve other purposes for us. Sketch is used to design the components themselves and they are then exported to Zeroheight where they are showcased and enriched with textual information. Zeplin is used to design application pages, and again the components are exported to Zeplin from Sketch. But Zeroheight is mainly used for the development of the components themselves as well as a documentation for our design guideline in general. It is also used by us for design tokens and patterns, as well as other information on the design guideline, so if someone wants to understand the "why" of a design decision, the explanation can be usually found in Zeroheight too.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
  • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
  • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
Read full review
zeroheight
  • increased quality, as less misunderstandings or communication problems occur
  • increased speed of development, as it is a single source of truth for us. The developer can rely on the information in Zeroheight being correct so that he doesn't have to iterate his code again and again.
Read full review
ScreenShots