OpsGenie vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpsGenie
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
OpsGenie is an IT monitoring and incident response platform for development and operations teams, providing alerts and schedule management escalations. OpsGenie is now part of Atlassian since the late 2018 acquisition.
$0
up to 5 users
Ansible
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it.
$5,000
per year
Pricing
OpsGenieRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Editions & Modules
Free
$0.00
up to 5 users
Essentials
$9.00
per user/per month
Standard
$19.00
per user/per month
Enterprise
$29.00
per user/per month
Basic Tower
5,000
per year
Enterprise Tower
10,000
per year
Premium Tower
14,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpsGenieAnsible
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpsGenieRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Features
OpsGenieRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Configuration Management
Comparison of Configuration Management features of Product A and Product B
OpsGenie
-
Ratings
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
8.3
145 Ratings
3% above category average
Infrastructure Automation00 Ratings8.9139 Ratings
Automated Provisioning00 Ratings8.5136 Ratings
Parallel Execution00 Ratings8.5129 Ratings
Node Management00 Ratings8.5121 Ratings
Reporting & Logging00 Ratings7.3133 Ratings
Version Control00 Ratings7.9117 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpsGenieRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Freshservice
Freshservice
Score 8.5 out of 10
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Freshservice
Freshservice
Score 8.5 out of 10
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpsGenieRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(21 ratings)
9.3
(214 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(5 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(2 ratings)
8.3
(106 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpsGenieRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
Incident response is well suited to OpsGenie, and this is where it really shines—whether it's an outage, a security incident, or similar. My experience is mostly with security, and it offers a great audit trail. It minimises the need to cut and paste from different platforms when creating reports and ensures that what was said and what was done (along with any evidence) is persisted and reflected in the incident detail.
Read full review
Red Hat
For automating the configuration of a multi-node, multi-domain (Storage, VM, Container) cluster, Ansible is still the best choice; however, it is not an easy task to achieve. Creating the infrastructure layer, i.e., creating network nodes, VMs, and K8s clusters, still can't be achieved via Ansible. Additionally, error handling remains complex to resolve.
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Notifying through all the possible way like sms,mail and call.
  • Ita shows the activity log it is usefull when your paging team through the incident through that you can check who has acknowledged or not.
  • Notify the alerts to engineer as well as you can also add the description about alerts related what is it.
  • Here you can schedule for on-call engineers
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Debugging is easy, as it tells you exactly within your job where the job failed, even when jumping around several playbooks.
  • Ansible seems to integrate with everything, and the community is big enough that if you are unsure how to approach converting a process into a playbook, you can usually find something similar to what you are trying to do.
  • Security in AAP seems to be pretty straightforward. Easy to organize and identify who has what permissions or can only see the content based on the organization they belong to.
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • OpsGenie New Jira design has made it difficult for those not familiar with that style.
  • OpsGenie could benefit from nested escalation flows for team schedules. Creating a product alert that uses and Tech Schedule as well as an Incident Manager Schedule that already exists would create less overhead and ease management.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • I can't think of any right now because I've heard about the Lightspeed and I'm really excited about that. Ansible has been really solid for us. We haven't had any issues. Maybe the upgrade process, but other than that, as coming from a user, it's awesome.
  • Give out Lightspeed for free.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Even is if it's a great tool, we are looking to renew our licence for our production servers only. The product is very expensive to use, so we might look for a cheaper solution for our non-production servers. One of the solution we are looking, is AWX, free, and similar to AAP. This is be perfect for our non-production servers.
Read full review
Usability
Atlassian
In general terms OpsGenie is a well done tool for solving the alert incident management, the usability is super ok during the configuration and during the alert. The main opportunity I found is the reporting and analytics section which is a little difficult to understand at a first sight and the refresh is not automatic, some little frictions but frictions at all
Read full review
Red Hat
It's overall pretty easy to use foe all the applications I've mentioned before: configuring hosts, installing packages through tools like apt, applying yaml, making changes across wide groups of hosts, etc. Its not a 10 because of the inconveinience of the yaml setup, and the time to write is not worth it for something applied one time to only a few hosts
Read full review
Performance
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Great in almost every way compared to any other configuration management software. The only thing I wish for is python3 support. Other than that, YAML is much improved compared to the Ruby of Chef. The agentless nature is incredibly convenient for managing systems quickly, and if a member of your term has no terminal experience whatsoever they can still use the UI.
Read full review
Support Rating
Atlassian
They are fully available at all times via chat, phone, or email and follow up thoroughly.
Read full review
Red Hat
There is a lot of good documentation that Ansible and Red Hat provide which should help get someone started with making Ansible useful. But once you get to more complicated scenarios, you will benefit from learning from others. I have not used Red Hat support for work with Ansible, but many of the online resources are helpful.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
I spoke on this topic today!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
We also looked at PagerDuty but decided to go with OpsGenie as it had more features on the plan we needed compared to PagerDuty which would have required us to spend a lot more for what we felt were non-premium features. Everything felt like an add-on - automation for an additional $20 a user per month seemed like a lot on top of the base plan
Read full review
Red Hat
AAP compares favorably with Terraform and Power Automate. I don't have much experience with Terraform, but I find AAP and Ansible easier to use as well as having more capabilities. Power Platform is also an excellent automation tool that is user friendly but I feel that Ansible has more compatibility with a variety of technologies.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • Helped us track bugs and issues that came up during product launch periods which reduced overhead that normally came with needing to manually contact the right team members
  • Prevented last minute breaking issues from falling through the cracks, decreased time to fix by automatically alerting the team members and allowing the product and project teams to easily see what active alerts are in progress
Read full review
Red Hat
  • POSITIVE: currently used by the IT department and some others, but we want others to use it.
  • NEGATIVE: We need less technical output for the non-technical. It should be controllable or a setting within playbooks. We also need more graphical responses (non-technical).
  • POSITIVE: Always being updated and expanded (CaC, EDA, Policy as Code, execution environments, AI, etc..)
Read full review
ScreenShots