TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Oracle Access Management vs. PingOne from Ping Identity vs. SAP Access Control

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Oracle Access Management

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AOracle Access Management delivers risk-aware, end-to-end multifactor authentication (MFA) and single sign-on (SSO) that integrate identities and systems across cloud and on-premises.N/A

    PingOne from Ping Identity

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AThe PingOne Cloud Platform from Ping Identity in Denver, Colorado is an identity management and access solution (IAM) for enterprises. Features of the products include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, user management with directory, provisioning and deprovisioning. The solution is presented as a comprehensive, standards-based platform that allows users and devices to securely access any service, application or API from any device. Designed for hybrid IT…

    $20,000

    per year

    SAP Access Control

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/ASAP Access control streamlines the process of managing and validating user access to applications and data with minimal support from IT, with the goal of giving employees the applications and services they need without exposing data and processes to unauthorized use.N/A
    Pricing
    Oracle Access ManagementPingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Essential
    $20,000
    per year
    Plus
    $40,000
    per year
    Premium
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Oracle Access ManagementPingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
    Free Trial
    NoYesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsTry PingOne for Customers for free. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of PingOne for customers.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Oracle Access ManagementPingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
    Considered Multiple Products
    Oracle
    No answer on this topic
    Ping Identity
    No answer on this topic
    SAP
    Chose SAP Access Control
    Depends on which ERP products your company uses. If your company uses SAP then SAP Access Control fits perfectly. As our company uses SAP systems for all process and business areas we used SAP Access Control. With latest GRC 12 version it is much better with S/4HANA application.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    90%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    15 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    9 Answers
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    14 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    14 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    86%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    Features
    Oracle Access ManagementPingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
    Identity Management
    Comparison of Identity Management features of Oracle Access Management and PingOne from Ping Identity and SAP Access Control
    Feature
    Oracle Access Management
    -
    Ratings
    PingOne from Ping Identity
    9.1
    10 Ratings
    10% above category average
    SAP Access Control
    -
    Ratings
    ID-Management Access Control00 Ratings9.38 Ratings00 Ratings
    ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)00 Ratings9.710 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings9.310 Ratings00 Ratings
    Password Management00 Ratings10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Account Provisioning and De-provisioning00 Ratings8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    ID Management Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    ID Risk Management00 Ratings8.56 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Oracle Access ManagementPingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    JumpCloud
    Score9.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    OneLogin by One Identity
    Score9.4 out of 10
    ManageEngine ADManager Plus
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    ManageEngine ADManager Plus
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Oracle Access ManagementPingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.4
    (16 ratings)
    9.0
    (11 ratings)
    9.5
    (18 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    6.4
    (3 ratings)
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Oracle Access ManagementPingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    OAM is designed to be scalable, and it can handle large-scale deployments with thousands of users and applications. It provides a centralized framework for managing access to web applications and resources, enabling organizations to define and enforce security policies across their entire IT environment. OAM offers a range of authentication and authorization mechanisms, including multi-factor authentication and OAuth-based authentication, making it suitable for organizations that need to meet different security and compliance requirements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    Really like [this] solution, it fits our requirements 100%. There are unlimited possibilities to extend the product, either by creating additional adapters or selectors. We really like the policy management level in PingFederate. It's extremely helpful when we can specify customer journey per many different requirements like user location, application type etc. As well, both StepUp and TopDown authentication flows were implemented [easily].
    Read full review
    SAP
    Appropriate for SAP hrs hierarchy integration and can have multiple hierarchies of org structures adopted as alternative workflow support. Cons of access control are the logs of firefighter usage are still limited in depth and does not evolve to adop more cloud products which are coming at a plaster pace than the ac product as such.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • Oracle Access Management allows superior session management capabilities. It can maintain and terminate session states using access engine and endpoint cookies or security tokens.
    • It allows for automated single sign-on as well as protocol translation.
    • The suite allows for real-time fraud detection and prevention capabilities. This is especially useful where our applications are accessed by tens of thousands of users simultaneously.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    • Based on open standards, we can use as much or as little of the Ping suite as we like, depending on which other technologies we've already implemented.
    • Continuous innovation and product enhancements have ensured their products continue to meet our rapidly evolving needs.
    • Ping Identity has been an outstanding partner, starting with the RFP process and continuing to this day, years after the sale. They are focused on our success at every level of the company and are highly responsive to our needs, issues, and product suggestions.
    Read full review
    SAP
    • SAP Access Control ensures that our services are accessed by the right users since it send me alerts when an employee tries to access any application. That way, I am able to either authorize or cancel the request to safeguard of company data.
    • With SAP Access Control, it is easy to automate and monitor how our team access services and applications. SAP Access Control has an automatic feature that notifies me when employees access applications and services and the issues they are encountering.
    • In addition, SAP Access Control add security on employees login to ensure that their data on the applications are encrypted to never leak to cyber attackers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Oracle
    • The product could be improved by simplifying changing the master password. That is, if you change a password in one place, it would be good to automate changing the password for all the gateways so that change is less complicated.
    • It should be more Customizable for Customer Specific needs.
    • Oracle Access Management connects well with Oracle Database but doesn't work smoothly with Microsoft AD.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    • PingID has some limitations when used as the MFA for some LDAP implementations. You need to use it as a RADIUS password credential validator to solve for some of those limitations, which in turn causes challenges with our ephemeral cloud deployment model of PingFederate.
    • The basic logon services within PingFederate are adequate and well-documented, but simple features like disabling user input after entering credentials would help with some of the additional customization required to support real world failure modes.
    • PingCentral authorization models and configuration remain unpolished compared to other products, and now the features seem to be shifting toward onboarding PingAccess and PingDirectory over improving baseline administrative functionality/operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • It still uses the webdynpro for the front end. All webdynpro applications should be migrated to Fiori for a better user experience.
    • Some functionalities can't manage in mass way. I.E. building derive roles/multiple single roles,
    • Interface with LDAP is not efficient.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Ping Identity
    No answers on this topic
    SAP
    We are very happy with it.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Oracle
    Usability with this platform is pretty good after you get a handle of things. I must say for new users it can take some time for training and adoption. This however is not just limited to Oracle products but most major ERP. Once you get past the initial training period all should be well from there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    Ping's solutions are a powerful tool, but with that comes the need for skills to operate them. It's not easy for inexperienced engineers to run. From the end-user perspective, it is fully customizable and can be as seamless as you need.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    This is a great tool for a medium to large sized company. SAP Access Control requires a great deal of SAP knowledge to use, but it is certainly information that can be learned. Their customer support is wonderful and easy to work with. The overall usability is great. I greatly recommend this software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Ping Identity
    Really good customer support, we always receive what we need. Sometimes instead of [a] solution (which have to be developed) we are receiving [a] work around, which is helping ad hoc. Then after time [needed for support to] develop fix we are receiving full fix or we [are] just waiting for new version of the product where our "bugs" are fixed.
    Read full review
    SAP
    This product fulfills all our requirements. We can use this for user management, role management, risk analysis, business role management, workflow management. Initial configuration takes a lot of effort. Otherwise it's a great product for the end user. SAP Access Control tool performance needs improvement, sometimes it slows down the processing time for requests.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    Both are great products. From a technical point of view Oracle Access Management implementation is relatively simple due to the possibility to adjust the functionality and appearance of the system to the customer's needs. SAP is a robust product but not user friendly and more expensive. Overall cost and product functionality was what drove us to implement Oracle Access Management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    PingOne from Ping Identity is the clear winner here. I can say this because the cost of their service is very worth it, and their service offers more than their competitors. In addition to that, this software is still improving daily, which only means that there is still more to come, and their Developers are giving their fair share of service to keep their software the best.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    Pricing was higher for the cloud version of the BTP service - IAG. SAP Access Control pretty much facilitates everything we are looking for as an enterprise with an efficient dollar cost ROI for the services we are looking for. Also, there were many features on the cloud version which came bundled with the license and we had to pay for them even though we did not actually use these products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • It help us to reduce password fatigue & exposure related to numerous applications within the organization thus enhancing the users performance
    • The single point of failure always keeps us in tension which make us little nervous about this Oracle SSO.
    • The cost of this product licenses adds to one of the dislikes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    • The TCO for our deployment of Ping will be over a million dollars/year less to operate compared to the systems it replaces.
    • Moving the organization to federated protocols allows greater flexibility in our cloud migration strategy and zero trust designs.
    • Operating with federated protocols internally facilitates M&A and divestiture activities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Reducing risk of fraud. Implementing SAP Access Control allows analysis of every role assigned to a job on the organization. Through this analysis, weakness on roles are detected, corrected and monitored. As the users feel the change, they also feel that they are being monitored, preventing any intent to use his position and privileges to take personal advantage. So a major impact to organizations is to reduce the financial lost due to frauds.
    • Reducing cost for monitoring. Another positive impact is lowering the cost of monitoring. This is twofold: First, a rather small team can manage access management. Second, through the use of SAP Access Control the complete universe of roles and users can be monitored without increasing the cost for the continuous monitoring.
    • During transactions. The use of SAP Access Controls allows detection of transactions that, from an information security point of view, require some redesign. When SAP GCR is implemented, you make some discoveries such as: obsolete transactions, transactions with no authorization objects and the like. The transactions with these problems can be left out of the active roles, waiting for remediation of the issues found.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots