PingOne from Ping Identity vs. SAP Access Control

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PingOne from Ping Identity
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
The PingOne Cloud Platform from Ping Identity in Denver, Colorado is an identity management and access solution (IAM) for enterprises. Features of the products include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, user management with directory, provisioning and deprovisioning. The solution is presented as a comprehensive, standards-based platform that allows users and devices to securely access any service, application or API from any device. Designed for hybrid IT…
$20,000
per year
SAP Access Control
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
SAP Access control streamlines the process of managing and validating user access to applications and data with minimal support from IT, with the goal of giving employees the applications and services they need without exposing data and processes to unauthorized use.N/A
Pricing
PingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
Editions & Modules
Essential
$20,000
per year
Plus
$40,000
per year
Premium
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTry PingOne for Customers for free. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of PingOne for customers.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
Features
PingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
PingOne from Ping Identity
9.3
9 Ratings
12% above category average
SAP Access Control
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)10.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication9.59 Ratings00 Ratings
Password Management10.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Risk Management8.56 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
Small Businesses
1Password
1Password
Score 9.2 out of 10
Teams Manager
Teams Manager
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
ManageEngine ADManager Plus
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Imprivata Enterprise Access Management
Imprivata Enterprise Access Management
Score 7.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(8 ratings)
7.9
(16 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
6.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(4 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
PingOne from Ping IdentitySAP Access Control
Likelihood to Recommend
Ping Identity
Really like [this] solution, it fits our requirements 100%. There are unlimited possibilities to extend the product, either by creating additional adapters or selectors. We really like the policy management level in PingFederate. It's extremely helpful when we can specify customer journey per many different requirements like user location, application type etc. As well, both StepUp and TopDown authentication flows were implemented [easily].
Read full review
SAP
Appropriate for SAP hrs hierarchy integration and can have multiple hierarchies of org structures adopted as alternative workflow support. Cons of access control are the logs of firefighter usage are still limited in depth and does not evolve to adop more cloud products which are coming at a plaster pace than the ac product as such.
Read full review
Pros
Ping Identity
  • Based on open standards, we can use as much or as little of the Ping suite as we like, depending on which other technologies we've already implemented.
  • Continuous innovation and product enhancements have ensured their products continue to meet our rapidly evolving needs.
  • Ping Identity has been an outstanding partner, starting with the RFP process and continuing to this day, years after the sale. They are focused on our success at every level of the company and are highly responsive to our needs, issues, and product suggestions.
Read full review
SAP
  • SAP Access Control ensures that our services are accessed by the right users since it send me alerts when an employee tries to access any application. That way, I am able to either authorize or cancel the request to safeguard of company data.
  • With SAP Access Control, it is easy to automate and monitor how our team access services and applications. SAP Access Control has an automatic feature that notifies me when employees access applications and services and the issues they are encountering.
  • In addition, SAP Access Control add security on employees login to ensure that their data on the applications are encrypted to never leak to cyber attackers.
Read full review
Cons
Ping Identity
  • Solutions are attractive to engineers but harder to sell to upper management.
  • Support was initially a challenge but has improved immensely.
Read full review
SAP
  • It still uses the webdynpro for the front end. All webdynpro applications should be migrated to Fiori for a better user experience.
  • Some functionalities can't manage in mass way. I.E. building derive roles/multiple single roles,
  • Interface with LDAP is not efficient.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Ping Identity
No answers on this topic
SAP
We are very happy with it.
Read full review
Usability
Ping Identity
As I mentioned earlier, efficiency and security are this software's bread and butter. The usability is very simple and straightforward, very user-friendly. As a result, it is efficient in a way that we can provide faster quality service to our merchants, and security in a way that our credentials will never leak since PingOne always values Personal Identifiable Information.
Read full review
SAP
This is a great tool for a medium to large sized company. SAP Access Control requires a great deal of SAP knowledge to use, but it is certainly information that can be learned. Their customer support is wonderful and easy to work with. The overall usability is great. I greatly recommend this software.
Read full review
Support Rating
Ping Identity
Ping's support is willing and attentive, but if I am in a position to engage them I am often at a point where most of the usual support engineers would not be in a position to answer the questions I have. However, Ping has been more than willing to engage their product and development teams with our organization as we take advanced deployment and use case challenges to them.
Read full review
SAP
This product fulfills all our requirements. We can use this for user management, role management, risk analysis, business role management, workflow management. Initial configuration takes a lot of effort. Otherwise it's a great product for the end user. SAP Access Control tool performance needs improvement, sometimes it slows down the processing time for requests.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Ping Identity
This solution is selected before my time so, not much influence ,but product allow to customized and require decent ping skills to configure the solution. Okta and Other solutions are well suited in this category with some positive and some negative capabilities. it must say that Auth0 is the best option with Azure Identity to move ahead.
Read full review
SAP
Pricing was higher for the cloud version of the BTP service - IAG. SAP Access Control pretty much facilitates everything we are looking for as an enterprise with an efficient dollar cost ROI for the services we are looking for. Also, there were many features on the cloud version which came bundled with the license and we had to pay for them even though we did not actually use these products.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Ping Identity
  • Decreased overall number of help desk calls for password reset.
  • Reduced time need for authentication; user[s] now have to authenticate once to be able to use more than 20 applications, instead of authenticating 20 times (per app).
Read full review
SAP
  • Reducing risk of fraud. Implementing SAP Access Control allows analysis of every role assigned to a job on the organization. Through this analysis, weakness on roles are detected, corrected and monitored. As the users feel the change, they also feel that they are being monitored, preventing any intent to use his position and privileges to take personal advantage. So a major impact to organizations is to reduce the financial lost due to frauds.
  • Reducing cost for monitoring. Another positive impact is lowering the cost of monitoring. This is twofold: First, a rather small team can manage access management. Second, through the use of SAP Access Control the complete universe of roles and users can be monitored without increasing the cost for the continuous monitoring.
  • During transactions. The use of SAP Access Controls allows detection of transactions that, from an information security point of view, require some redesign. When SAP GCR is implemented, you make some discoveries such as: obsolete transactions, transactions with no authorization objects and the like. The transactions with these problems can be left out of the active roles, waiting for remediation of the issues found.
Read full review
ScreenShots