TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Oracle CPQ

    Score5.5 out of 10
    N/AOracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.

    $240

    per month per user

    Proposable

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AProposable is a sales proposal automation software solution offered by Proposable.

    $19

    per user/per month

    Pricing
    Oracle CPQProposable
    Editions & Modules
    CPQ Pricing
    $240.00
    per month per user
    Solo
    $19
    per user/per month
    Team
    $39
    per user/per month
    Enterprise
    500+
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Oracle CPQProposable
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Oracle CPQProposable
    CPQ
    Comparison of CPQ features of Oracle CPQ and Proposable
    Feature
    Oracle CPQ
    6.7
    18 Ratings
    26% below category average
    Proposable
    -
    Ratings
    Quote sharing/sending7.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product configuration8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration options8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pricing rules7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Price adjustment5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Purchase history and open contracts6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Guided selling/Sales portal7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    CPQ reporting & analytics7.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    CPQ-CRM integration7.015 Ratings00 Ratings
    Attachments to quotes5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order capturing7.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Proposal Creation & Organization
    Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Oracle CPQ and Proposable
    Feature
    Oracle CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Proposable
    7.8
    3 Ratings
    0% above category average
    Proposal branding00 Ratings9.63 Ratings
    Proposal templates00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
    Proposal content library updates00 Ratings6.83 Ratings
    Guided proposal creation00 Ratings5.82 Ratings
    Searchable proposal database00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
    Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Oracle CPQ and Proposable
    Feature
    Oracle CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Proposable
    8.5
    3 Ratings
    8% above category average
    RFP management & response00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Proposal collaboration & approval00 Ratings9.12 Ratings
    User permissions/proposal editing controls00 Ratings7.33 Ratings
    Sales proposal workflow00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
    Proposal automation user interface00 Ratings7.72 Ratings
    Proposal Delivery
    Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Oracle CPQ and Proposable
    Feature
    Oracle CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Proposable
    7.7
    3 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Proposal distribution00 Ratings6.63 Ratings
    Interactive proposals00 Ratings9.43 Ratings
    Proposal content tracking00 Ratings7.13 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Oracle CPQProposable
    Small Businesses
    QuoteWerks
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Qwilr
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    QuoteWerks
    Score9.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Agentforce Revenue Management
    Score8.6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Oracle CPQProposable
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (45 ratings)
    8.3
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.0
    (26 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    3.0
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    2.0
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Oracle CPQProposable
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proposable
    It is a great solution for small to medium-sized businesses. It is fairly customizable, and their support team has been great to work with us. They have helped us build some custom workflows to push a customer straight to a credit card page once they sign the proposal. This has really helped increase conversions when signing on a new customer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • Leveraged automation to minimize headcount costs despite 10% year-over-year business growth, and enabled staff to focus on more strategic tasks.
    • Established a flexible CPQ system that scales on demand to easily accommodate the company’s multiple global locations.
    • Improved customer relations by reducing configuration time and allowing sales more time to meet with customers and close orders.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proposable
    • Very professional
    • Easy to navigate and use
    • Easy to edit and draw up new proposals
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Oracle
    • Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
    • Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
    • Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proposable
    • The user interface is not intuitive and you'll need some time to understand where things are.
    • The structure of the proposals is sort of rigid and is difficult to create really beautiful documents (unless you are a genius designer).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Oracle
    So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proposable
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Oracle
    The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Proposable
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Oracle
    Other than one day two years ago and an hour or two a few times since then due to data center outages, it has been very reliable
    Read full review
    Proposable
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Oracle
    It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
    Read full review
    Proposable
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Oracle
    Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
    Read full review
    Proposable
    No answers on this topic
    In-Person Training
    Oracle
    They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
    Read full review
    Proposable
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Oracle
    It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.

    Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.

    EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.

    The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.

    Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
    Read full review
    Proposable
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
    Read full review
    Proposable
    I didn't choose Proposable over DocuSign, but I did use it at a previous company. Proposable is great for the smaller business and makes the creation and sending of agreements so easy! DocuSign was nice, but it was more complex in my experience and created a bottleneck for our sales team to get approval. I'm sure this was more of our own internal process, but between the two, Proposable was much faster to get what you needed in the form of an agreement. Less time freed up more time for selling!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
    • Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
    • A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.
    Read full review
    Proposable
    • It has left a great impression on current prospects and clients
    • It is the easiest way to draw up terms of an agreement
    • It is the best way to track who and when a prospect is viewing a proposal
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots