Oracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.
$240
per month per user
Teamgate CRM
Score8.6 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Teamgate CRM is a cloud based intelligent sales CRM system
for small and mid-size teams. The intelligent aspect of
the system gives a salesman the most relevant reports and insights, and advice on every step that allows users to always stay in tact with the sales process, but also
helps users develop specific selling skills.
$49.90
per month per user
Pricing
Oracle CPQ
Teamgate CRM
Editions & Modules
CPQ Pricing
$240.00
per month per user
Starter
$0
for up to 2 users and 500 contacts
Team
$49.90
per month per user
Growth
$74.90
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle CPQ
Teamgate CRM
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
There is a 20% discount when billed annually
More Pricing Information
Features
Oracle CPQ
Teamgate CRM
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Oracle CPQ and Teamgate CRM
Feature
Oracle CPQ
6.7
18 Ratings
26% below category average
Teamgate CRM
-
Ratings
Quote sharing/sending
7.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product configuration
8.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration options
8.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pricing rules
7.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Price adjustment
5.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Purchase history and open contracts
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Guided selling/Sales portal
7.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ reporting & analytics
7.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ-CRM integration
7.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Attachments to quotes
5.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order capturing
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Oracle CPQ and Teamgate CRM
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Teamgate CRM
8.1
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Customer data management / contact management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Workflow management
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Territory management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Opportunity management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Contract management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Interaction tracking
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Oracle CPQ and Teamgate CRM
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Teamgate CRM
7.0
2 Ratings
10% below category average
Help desk management
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Oracle CPQ and Teamgate CRM
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Teamgate CRM
7.0
1 Ratings
10% below category average
Lead management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Oracle CPQ and Teamgate CRM
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Teamgate CRM
7.7
2 Ratings
0% above category average
Task management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Oracle CPQ and Teamgate CRM
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Teamgate CRM
8.3
2 Ratings
8% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Customizable reports
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Oracle CPQ and Teamgate CRM
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Teamgate CRM
8.0
2 Ratings
5% above category average
Custom fields
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Custom objects
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Oracle CPQ and Teamgate CRM
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Teamgate CRM
9.1
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Oracle CPQ and Teamgate CRM
I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Teamgate CRM is well suited for companies that want to centralize leads, current clients, and communication history in one CRM. A scenario where team gate is appropriate is if a company wants to use custom sales pipelines and stages to track a sales lead that will transition to a deal. A scenario where team gate is NOT appropriate is for a company that doesn't need a cloud-based CRM because there don't travel a lot and will always use the same computer that you might as well have a CRM server on-site and save money.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I rated this product an 8 for overall usability because Teamgate is very user-friendly and this helps the CRM meet the required use case that companies who buy it have. The feature to sign in from anywhere that has a net connection is huge For example the home page being the leads section and the fact that each lead has all the past and current communication with the potential client allows support agents, and the sales team to be on the same page I didn't give it a 10 because the slowness issue affects performance and usability.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
I haven't had to contact the support team as of yet but my co-worker expressed his frustration with the amount of technical product knowledge the Teamgate support team had. He said he felt he knew the product better than the Teamgate helpdesk.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.
Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.
EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.
The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.
Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.