The basis of this offering is the Market2Lead product that Oracle acquired in 2010. It has now been fully integrated with Oracle's On Demand CRM product and is a full-featured marketing automation product with features from lead management and nurturing, to measuring marketing ROI.
N/A
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Sugar Sell from SugarCRM is a collaborative CRM, allowing users to track and monitor activities, map each customer’s journey. Sugar Sell replaces former editions of the SugarCRM product, including the SugarCRM Community Edition, the open source edition, which is discontinued.
$19
per month per user (3 users minimum, billed annually)
Pricing
Oracle CRM On Demand
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essentials
$19
per month (billed annually) per user (3 user minimum, 9 user maximum)
Standard
$59
per month (billed annually) per user (10 User Minimum)
Advanced
$85
per month (billed annually) per user (10 user minimum)
Premier
$135
per month (billed annually) per user (10 user minimum)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle CRM On Demand
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle CRM On Demand
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Features
Oracle CRM On Demand
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.9
25 Ratings
13% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
4.8
33 Ratings
47% below category average
Customer data management / contact management
8.025 Ratings
5.032 Ratings
Workflow management
9.024 Ratings
6.028 Ratings
Territory management
8.024 Ratings
6.026 Ratings
Opportunity management
8.025 Ratings
7.026 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
9.022 Ratings
7.029 Ratings
Contract management
9.024 Ratings
3.026 Ratings
Quote & order management
10.023 Ratings
4.024 Ratings
Interaction tracking
9.024 Ratings
3.030 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
10.023 Ratings
2.025 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.7
24 Ratings
24% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
2.3
24 Ratings
108% below category average
Case management
10.024 Ratings
3.024 Ratings
Call center management
10.023 Ratings
2.019 Ratings
Help desk management
9.024 Ratings
2.017 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.5
24 Ratings
9% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
5.5
25 Ratings
34% below category average
Lead management
8.024 Ratings
6.022 Ratings
Email marketing
9.022 Ratings
5.023 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.0
24 Ratings
16% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
3.0
28 Ratings
88% below category average
Task management
9.023 Ratings
4.026 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
9.022 Ratings
3.018 Ratings
Reporting
9.023 Ratings
2.024 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.5
24 Ratings
11% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
3.3
28 Ratings
79% below category average
Forecasting
10.024 Ratings
3.024 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
6.623 Ratings
2.025 Ratings
Customizable reports
9.024 Ratings
5.027 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
8.2
24 Ratings
7% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
5.5
29 Ratings
33% below category average
Custom fields
9.024 Ratings
6.029 Ratings
Custom objects
9.024 Ratings
5.026 Ratings
Scripting environment
5.820 Ratings
6.019 Ratings
API for custom integration
9.023 Ratings
5.025 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.5
25 Ratings
13% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
5.5
27 Ratings
41% below category average
Single sign-on capability
10.022 Ratings
5.021 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.025 Ratings
6.026 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.0
18 Ratings
19% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
3.0
19 Ratings
85% below category average
Social data
9.018 Ratings
3.019 Ratings
Social engagement
9.018 Ratings
3.016 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CRM On Demand
9.0
22 Ratings
19% above category average
Sugar Sell (SugarCRM)
4.5
19 Ratings
49% below category average
Marketing automation
9.022 Ratings
5.019 Ratings
Compensation management
9.020 Ratings
4.013 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Product A and Product B
I think it is well suited for organizations which are large with a lot of users so as to be able to minimize the cost of operations. Also, the organization which interacts mostly with customers can use Oracle CRM on demand.
Sugar CRM is a good tool, but it's complex to customize. It often requires expensive 3rd partners to implement more complex scenarios that SugarCRM struggles to support; coming back with explanations was usually time-consuming and unsupported. The back end is overly complex in terms of what it needs to be, with many redundant database tables and columns.
Several of our members were not familiar with various IT functions within CRM prior to working with it and so they were able to develop a working knowledge of IT pretty quickly afterwards.
It has a familiar feel to it as it allows users to work the data into a spreadsheet type layout with pivot tables and graphs and so it is quick to adopt.
Customization is great with a working knowledge of HTML, which isn't too hard to learn. You can really adapt CRM to any needs stylistically or content wise.
Great way to keep myself organized. I do not miss appointments with clients since within the system I can input my appointment time and also send out a reminder to my clients.
It has a nice layout [that] does not seem to be cluttered. I find it to be very user friendly.
It has customizable dashboards which I find beneficial
The ability to schedule and push out reports is missing from this system. If we want to mass deliver a report on a schedule, we must run it, export it and email it out to the group, or purchase a 3rd party system.
The ability to trigger workflow events on a schedule is missing this system. Currently, there has to be a trigger initiated by a user and we have situations where we'd like to be able to schedule a work flow routine to go out and check from specific situations and then trigger an action. We'd also like to be able to trigger workflow actions on one object based on something in another object and this capability is very limited.
Our organization will continue to use Sugar as long as it remains cost effective and it addresses the majority of our needs. I will, however, recommend looking into other options once our needs increase and there is additional budget for some bigger named and more robust platform options. I feel if the application was friendlier to end users we would get better productivity as well.
Compared to other competitors I find it very easy to use and learn .It has been helpful in our organisation and we have been able to manage our projects and operations well without interference.
There's a learning curve associated with Sugar. Right away, it's not as easy as an out-of-the-box CRM. Once you learn how to use Sugar, the system fits what your needs are. With any other CRM, you'd be trying to figure out how your company can best fit the CRM. You don't want to change your business cycle for your CRM, the CRM should fit your business cycle.
The support overall at least for us has been phenomenal. Anytime that the system has any Issues at all IT gets in contact from someone from support to get the system back up and running. Have never gone more than 30 minutes with the system not working. So overall I will be definetely recommending this system in any other company that I may work for in the future.
We feel clasroom training is essential to ensure user adoption and buy-in. Video and on-line training courses gave their place but being in a classroom setting enables the Team to make any potential CRM issues visble right up front.
Study, study, and study. Be prepared to train everyday until all processes are flowing nicely. The CRM is the elephant and figuring out where to take the first bite can be a challenge. But there is only one way to eat this elephant, one bite at a time. Systematic planning is very important.
MS Dynamics was easy to integrate to MS Power BI. This BI and reporting aspect is a clear strong point for Microsoft. MS solutions seem easier to integrate and learn, but this depends on the IT landscape and the complexity of integrations in a respective company.
SugarCRM is a lot better in many ways then LogicsCRM which I started using when I started as a sales rep at Community Tax. Yet there is still room for a lot of improvements to accommodate a steady workflow. They integration of old CRM files seems to have worked great from Logics to Sugar.
This software can display in real-time when an order is submitted, received, fulfilled, and shipped out. We are able to know within the week of what new orders came in and how effective we are being from targeting specific regions of the nation.