PandaDoc vs. Surfe
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PandaDoc | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $35 per month per seat |
Surfe | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | Surfe is a lead gen tool used to add contacts, manage deals and pipelines straight from LinkedIn, and move this data into a CRM. Without tab-switching or manual data entry, Surf makes CRM fields accessible on LinkedIn, and users can input information, create new fields, and edit existing ones, while syncing this to a connected CRM in real-time. Surfe also helps users to save time by adding prospects from LinkedIn with a click of a button directly from their profile, and it does that without… | $23 per year per seat |
| PandaDoc | Surfe | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing. | Prices are for annual subscriptions. Monthly subscriptions are available. No credit card is needed for the trial and free. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| PandaDoc | Surfe | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 222 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
97% Delivers good value for the price 204 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 221 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 174 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
97% Implementation went as expected 182 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| PandaDoc | Surfe | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | BoldSign, by Syncfusion Score10 out of 10 | Affinity CRM Score9.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | OneSpan Sign Score9.6 out of 10 | Podium Score7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | DocuSign Score8.7 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| PandaDoc | Surfe | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.5 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | - |
| Usability | 8.3 | - |
| Availability | 9.1 | - |
| Performance | 9.6 | - |
| Support Rating | 6.1 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 6.3 | - |
| Configurability | 2.8 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 8.6 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.7 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 6.7 | - |
| PandaDoc | Surfe | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | PandaDoc Screenshots | Surfe Screenshots |














