Reply vs. Salesforce Agentforce Revenue Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Reply
Score 7.2 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Reply.io helps sales teams book more meetings by automating outreach with smart AI. It finds leads, writes personalized messages, handles replies, and books meetings, so you can focus on closing deals. Reply.io's AI SDR learns the product, targets its potential users, and engages across email, LinkedIn, SMS, WhatsApp, and calls. Additionally it: Handles replies, books meetings, and works in multiple languages Has access to 1B+ leads with…
$50
per month
Agentforce Revenue Management
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Salesforce Revenue Cloud (formerly Salesforce CPQ or SteelBrick) is built and delivered on the Salesforce Platform and Salesforce1 Mobile App which enables users to create accurate sales quotes quickly and submit error-free orders on the fly from any device.
$30
Per User per Month
Pricing
ReplySalesforce Agentforce Revenue Management
Editions & Modules
AI Chat
$50
per month
Email Volume
$59
per month per user
Multichannel
$99
per month per user
Agency
$166 (starts at)
per month (billed annually) per account
AI SDR Starter
starting with $800
per month 1000 active contacts
AI SDR Growth
Starts from $2500
per month 5000 active contacts
Basic
$30
Per User per Month
Professional
$50
Per User per Month
Enterprise
$75
Per User per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ReplyAgentforce Revenue Management
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ReplySalesforce Agentforce Revenue Management
Considered Both Products
Reply
Chose Reply
Reply is simpler and faster for reps. Sequencing, task queues, and basic A/B testing are easy to run, so ramp time and admin overhead stay low. Salesloft is stronger for enterprise governance, dialer ecosystem, and deeper analytics. HubSpot offers the widest footprint with CRM, …
Chose Reply
I’ve used Apollo.io alongside Reply, and while Apollo offers broader data enrichment and prospecting tools, Reply shines in its simplicity and focus on outreach automation. Reply’s interface feels lighter and more intuitive, making it easier to manage campaigns without …
Chose Reply
Reply is a decent alternative, but in my opinion, not much better than the selected platform alternatives
Chose Reply
We use Reply for our outbound sales initiatives, and the system performs excellently for us, outperforming any other platform. This is a fantastic
Chose Reply
Reply is a very good and widely known platform. I find it to be a lot more sophisticated and composed. I believe this tool works great for both large and small companies, which makes it stand out. There are so many other tools that work great, but they are restricted to the …
Chose Reply
Its customer service is very professional. They respond to my messages within a few minutes. I recently had a hard time creating templates, and their representative gives me the right workable solution, which makes me more comfortable using the platform on the next step. It …
Chose Reply
These tools are great, but they aren't built for what we use Reply for. Reply is perfect for doing these outbound campaigns at scale, whereas with ActiveCampaign and Vitally we were trying to turn the tools into something they are not.
Chose Reply
Reply is more user-friendly and has more features than the other tools I’ve used. It doesn’t have every feature we need, but it works better than the others that exist in the important aspects (connects to Gmail, accurate results, customization, etc.)
Chose Reply
Outreach did not cater to the Indian audience, hence went with my second best choice :)
Chose Reply
Reply is a great tool, but it is not as sophisticated as Outreach. I think Outreach works best for larger companies, while Reply works great for smaller ones. The two tools have a lot of similarities. Outreach has also built a culture around their product, whereas Reply has not …
Chose Reply
We've used MailChimp's email chain automation but they don't work as well as Reply.io when you need a plain text email to write to your contact. Our Business Development Managers are happier with Reply.io and say it has met their needs a lot better than the instruments that …
Chose Reply
I terms of outbound emails, I would say Reply.io is very similar to SalesLoft Cadence. I haven't used Cadence since last year, so there may be upgrades that I'm unaware of. But I prefer the interface for Reply and it's significantly cheaper. For teams smaller than 4 you can't …
Chose Reply
I think Reply.io has the most features for the price and the ability for me to insert dynamic images was the real winner. I have found that this is usually an enterprise feature in most of the platforms I have evaluated. I also like that this is accessible to the every day …
Agentforce Revenue Management
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
It out performed Oracle CPQ in many levels like Salesforce Agentforce Revenue Management allowed us to create multi level complex quotes with our designed compliance and complex discounting. Its AI feature recommends cross-sells as well that i havent seen or heard anywhere. And …
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
Salesforce Agentforce Revenue Management is light years ahead of Conga (formerly Apttus CPQ). It seems ARM continues to innovate while Conga/Apttus lags behind. The injection of AI and Automation is also far superior in Salesforce Agentforce Revenue Management due to the …
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
I think Revenue Cloud definitely gives a lot more functionality, whereas you can't do contracts management contracts and order management inside of Sales Cloud and Service Cloud. So I guess it's just a different product that's used for a different use case.
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
It's good in some ways and bad in others. I would say it's good in that it has the building blocks to have way more functionality than many other products, but it's much more complicated to administer.
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
Better UI with advance d capacities
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
This software is so complex we can say that Salesforce works so much better in the interface. Also, the features provided by Salesforce are far better than this software. It also includes Storing data, API development, and so many other functionalities which help a developer …
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
This has better product capabilities like Manage Order, Mobile, pricing module, select product offers service channel. What I like best is the integration with Salesforce, the ability to create and connect opportunities and there is a lot of flexibility in this tool. It has a …
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
There is no comparison to a fully functional instance of CPQ. Nothing comes close due to the amount of customization and ease of use that CPQ offers once it's fully built out. Other solutions may be easier to build or administer, but for the users and business needs, CPQ is the …
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
It is complementary to salesforce so I don´t think there is a necessity to compare between groove and Salesforce Revenue Cloud.
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
SalesForce Revenue Cloud has been leaps and bounds ahead of the softwares I used to use! I had used Google Sheets at first (since it was free), then bought Excel briefly thinking that would suffice as a good CRM layout. Turns out I was wrong and needed something more. Revenue …
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
This program is just more advanced and customizable. It worked for our diverse team needs considering the size and complexity of our portfolio. This was just the right choice for us. The other CRM's were great for smaller-scale enterprises at the time that I used them.
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
This is an efficient tool and user-friendly.
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
Salesforce CPQ was faster in performance and suited our needs.
Its direct integration on the SFDC platform made it easier to implement.
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
Salesforce CPQ [(formerly SteelBrick)] seamlessly integrates with Salesforce allowing us to have less integrations to manage. Releases don't break a connection causing delays in the sales process.
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
We felt Salesforce had less risk with integrations to our CRM - also Big Machines couldn't handle our complexity.
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
I don't know any competitor for Salesforce CPQ .
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
I haven't used PandaDoc, but a friend of mine uses it at their organization and recommended it.
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
It seemed really complicated comparably and didn’t seem to have the integration abilities that Salesforce CPQ has with Salesforce.
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
Salesforce stacks well in terms of features like lead, quote and pricing management than other software like Zoho, bichon, agile or Hubspot, personally I believe if the entire set of tools and solutions provided by Salesforce are employed they would work like a well-oiled …
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
Salesforces CPQ compares very highly to Apparound CPQ, because of the integration with the Salesforce platform. Because of the integration with the regular Salesforce platform, the tools work interchangeably with one another. This process creates a great deal of efficiency, and …
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
CPQ is a more inline, integrated and user-friendly product compared to Apttus's offering. The fact that it was bought and embedded by Salesforce into the platform and the support that entails, was the big differentiator for us.
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
Salesforce CPQ is much better in user interaction, automation, AI, and integration with CRM, and other business systems.
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
It is a strong offering if your a Salesforce customer. We previously used Panda Doc and the integration with Saleforce was just not robust enough as we've expanded. Panda Doc allowed for much more customization and control of templates. However, the pricing rules, …
Chose Agentforce Revenue Management
It was not my choice to move to Salesforce CPQ. Our organization chose to move to this platform because Octiv gave the reps too much flexibility. They wanted to tighten the reins. Everyone hates Salesforce CPQ and the guy who implemented it isn't even at the company anymore.
Features
ReplySalesforce Agentforce Revenue Management
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Product A and Product B
Reply
-
Ratings
Salesforce Agentforce Revenue Management
8.8
Ratings
1% above category average
Quote sharing/sending00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Product configuration00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Configuration options00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Pricing rules00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Price adjustment00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Purchase history and open contracts00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Guided selling/Sales portal00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
CPQ reporting & analytics00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
CPQ-CRM integration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Attachments to quotes00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Order capturing00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ReplySalesforce Agentforce Revenue Management
Small Businesses
Salesmate
Salesmate
Score 10.0 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
HubSpot Sales Hub
HubSpot Sales Hub
Score 8.8 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Outreach
Outreach
Score 8.3 out of 10
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ReplySalesforce Agentforce Revenue Management
Likelihood to Recommend
6.3
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.3
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ReplySalesforce Agentforce Revenue Management
Likelihood to Recommend
The
reply is an excellent sales management solution. If any company wants
to save time and keep their sales team flexible, they should try it first. It
is a fantastic tool for delivering multiple emails to any target audience. This
is also the best deal for firms who looking for an all-in-one solution, as it
provides virtually unlimited email addresses along with CRM and outreach
automation.
Read full review
CPQ is great if you can devote the time to it to make it perfect for your sales team. It requires a lot of time and energy to build it out and customize, but once that's done it is one of the most powerful tools you will have. Having an expert in CPQ is really helpful as well.
Read full review
Pros
  • This product gives me the liberty to very easily and freely navigate all things on my own, which does not require many skills to start working.
  • This product gives us the leverage of creating our own tailored and personalized templates for our teams in just a matter of minutes.
  • This program is so automated that it performs everything on its own from LinkedIn to email search, to even booking meetings.
  • I found the onboarding process pretty great and efficient. I am really happy with the overall customer support. They are some of the nicest people I have met who are there to willingly help me at any time of need and problem.
  • Their usability is also hands down very good. However, I find their user interface to be slightly less user-friendly, so there is some degree of scope in the improvement of their user intuitiveness and user-friendliness.
Read full review
  • It does a lot of pricing models really well. So like tiered pricing when you're selling a product has tiered pricing.
  • The out of the box approval functionalities is really good. It can trigger approvals based on a ton of different custom criteria.
  • The data it creates and tracks is really accurate and robust.
Read full review
Cons
  • Syncing to other programs. You cannot interrelate Reply with other software in a simple way. Zapier is required and even then it’s not perfect.
  • Similar to syncing, there’s no way to export results of particular campaigns. This is awful. If I send out a campaign to a group, I’d like to export the results to enter into a CRM since I can’t sync the contacts. One of these features must be added ASAP.
  • Organization. While Reply itself is user-friendly, keeping campaigns and contacts and results organized is not. You cannot organize campaigns or file them away when they are done. Therefore you have to delete campaigns to stay organized and lose results, which you cannot even export.
Read full review
  • Our Salesforce is very messy, which tells me it's not super easy to clean up.
  • I always have a really hard time removing a contacts from an account - it seems like you can't simply remove the relationship so we have lots of people named DO NOT CONTACT or things of that nature.
  • Sometimes when saving it doesn't seem like things actually save.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
The company is very easy to work with and is growing by leaps and bounds. We do not anticipate switching vendors anytime in the near future
Read full review
Usability
Reply’s overall usability is strong. The interface is intuitive, and most features are easy to navigate without much training. Creating and managing sequences is straightforward, and the automation flow saves a lot of manual effort. Occasionally, the dashboard can feel a bit cluttered, and reporting could be more flexible. But overall, it’s a user-friendly tool that allows teams to get started quickly and operate efficiently day to day
Read full review
Because it looked almost impossible to integrate it with Zoho CRM while our Sales Operations team was working on it. But thankfully it worked at last but at the expense of a month's time. However, it has made every possible Revenue operations task simpler now. And that has ultimately made our team more efficient in terms of work hours spent on manual work.
Read full review
Support Rating
I generally receive a reply in no time at all and found not only the support org. but the sales team to be extremely helpful. Additionally I found a great onboarding process with plenty of resources to consume.
Read full review
There have been some issues with multi-year pricing of certain products and services which we have been assured will be resolved but I guess are still underway, the support team apart from this has not been needed much and in the rare scenarios, it has been needed the resolutions of conflicts has been prompt and quick, so the overall support would have my high regards for being so helpful and customer-oriented so as to assure good performance of their toolset and customer satisfaction.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Reply is simpler and faster for reps. Sequencing, task queues, and basic A/B testing are easy to run, so ramp time and admin overhead stay low. Salesloft is stronger for enterprise governance, dialer ecosystem, and deeper analytics. HubSpot offers the widest footprint with CRM, marketing automation, and complex workflows, but it’s heavier and pricier. We chose Reply for speed, cleaner UX, and cost efficiency. Tradeoff: it lacks some HubSpot extras like advanced workflows, ticketing, and multi-touch attribution.
Read full review
This has better product capabilities like Manage Order, Mobile, pricing module, select product offers service channel. What I like best is the integration with Salesforce, the ability to create and connect opportunities and there is a lot of flexibility in this tool. It has a very user-friendly platform & navigation across pages is the best Also I like how fast I can create quotes. I also like how detailed you can get with reporting. Any possible metric we can think of can be tracked, measured, and integrated.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Reply.io has been a lot more effective than MailChimp in terms of the follow-ups for the email chains. We use them to contact the people who said they wanted to do business with us and MailChimp's emails usually went to Promotions on Gmail. With Reply.io, we overcame this problem and the open rate improved 30%.
Read full review
  • Easy access to reporting on closed-won, closed-lost, and open quotes.
  • Accuracy in data referenced in a quote - it's typically accurate as it is pulled directly from opportunity, looking up to associated subscription start/end dates, etc..
  • We lose valuable time in creating quotes ourselves. Quotes were requested and created through sales ops previously, sales did not have access to the excel templates used to generate quotes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Reply Screenshots

Screenshot of an overview of Reply's multichannel outreach toolScreenshot of Reply's multichannel cold outreachScreenshot of an overview of Reply's AI PersonalizationScreenshot of the email deliverability kitScreenshot of Reply's B2B databaseScreenshot of the AI SDR Agent

Agentforce Revenue Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Configure. Price. Quote. Anytime, anywhere, on any device.