Item: Reply
Rating: 8
Author: Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Reply

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Reply as our sales engagement hub to run targeted, multi-channel outbound at scale. SDRs and AEs build account-based sequences that combine email, calls, LinkedIn touches, and manual tasks. Reply handles send logic, reply detection, and prioritization so reps live in one queue instead of bouncing between tools. We integrate it with our CRM to keep stages, contacts, and activities in sync and we use Reply’s reporting to coach the team and iterate on messaging.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Automatic sequences
Embedded dialer and call recording
Outbound reports
Inbox centralization

Cons

AI features
Email sending (some emails are not sent for whatever reason)

Return on Investment

time optimization
meetings booked increased
data quality issues
CAC efficiency improved

Usability

Reply is easy to adopt: building sequences, personalizing first touches, and working a single task queue feels smooth. Reply detection, throttling, and CRM sync reduce manual cleanup and help reps move faster. Reporting at the step level is clear enough to A/B test and standardize winning copy.

Downsides: advanced branching and role-based approvals are limited, LinkedIn task handling is basic, and deliverability safeguards still need thoughtful setup. Analytics are good, but multi-sequence attribution and team-wide template governance could be stronger.

Alternatives Considered

Salesloft and HubSpot CRM

Reply is simpler and faster for reps. Sequencing, task queues, and basic A/B testing are easy to run, so ramp time and admin overhead stay low. Salesloft is stronger for enterprise governance, dialer ecosystem, and deeper analytics. HubSpot offers the widest footprint with CRM, marketing automation, and complex workflows, but it’s heavier and pricier. We chose Reply for speed, cleaner UX, and cost efficiency. Tradeoff: it lacks some HubSpot extras like advanced workflows, ticketing, and multi-touch attribution.

Key Insights

Do you think Reply delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Reply's feature set?

Yes

Did Reply live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Reply go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy Reply again?

Yes

Other Software Used

Asana, Slack, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Zoho CRM

Likelihood to Recommend

Reply works best for structured outbound to a defined ICP, where reps personalize the opener, then let multi-step cadences run across email, calls, and LinkedIn with reply detection and CRM sync. It excels for time-sensitive triggers, event follow ups, closed-lost recycling, and A/B testing to standardize winning copy. It is less suited to bespoke enterprise pursuits that need deep research or legal signoff on every touch, or to untargeted high-volume blasts. In those cases, keep Reply for light structure and handle core outreach manually.

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

Simple Fast Effective