Satmetrix was survey-based customer experience management software. It contained summary and individual customer data for tracking the customer lifecycle. Satmetrix was acquired by NICE Systems in July 2017, and is no longer available.
N/A
Survicate
Score8.5 out of 10
N/A
Survicate is survey software for getting continuous customer insights at scale. It can be used to measure customer satisfaction (CSAT), track an organization's Net Promoter Score (NPS), get website feedback, or test product-market fit. Survicate supports any use case related to collecting and managing customer feedback. Survicate can be used to: • Create customized surveys and start getting customer feedback within minutes • Run surveys where they are needed: via email…
$99
per month 500 responses per month
Pricing
Satmetrix (discontinued)
Survicate
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Good
$99
per month 500 responses per month
Better
$149
per month 1000 responses per month
Best
$249
per month 2500 responses per month
Better Than The Rest
$269
per month
Better Than The Rest
$299
per month Custom pool of yearly responses
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Satmetrix (discontinued)
Survicate
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Additional fees apply for additional users and domains. The price of the Scale plan is negotiated individually and depends on the number of monthly responses needed and possible custom needs, including integrations.
More Pricing Information
Features
Satmetrix (discontinued)
Survicate
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Satmetrix (discontinued) and Survicate
Feature
Satmetrix (discontinued)
8.0
2 Ratings
1% below category average
Survicate
9.7
5 Ratings
19% above category average
Survey templates
8.02 Ratings
9.83 Ratings
Themes
8.02 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
8.02 Ratings
9.83 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Satmetrix (discontinued) and Survicate
Feature
Satmetrix (discontinued)
8.0
2 Ratings
6% below category average
Survicate
9.1
4 Ratings
7% above category average
Changes to live survey
8.02 Ratings
9.93 Ratings
Question design help
8.02 Ratings
8.93 Ratings
Multiple question types
8.02 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Satmetrix (discontinued) and Survicate
Feature
Satmetrix (discontinued)
8.0
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Survicate
9.5
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Survey logic flexibility
8.02 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Satmetrix (discontinued) and Survicate
Feature
Satmetrix (discontinued)
8.0
2 Ratings
1% below category average
Survicate
8.0
5 Ratings
1% below category average
Response tracking
8.02 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Data export
8.02 Ratings
9.65 Ratings
Standard reports
8.02 Ratings
8.65 Ratings
Custom reports
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Analytics
8.02 Ratings
8.94 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Satmetrix (discontinued) and Survicate
Feature
Satmetrix (discontinued)
8.0
2 Ratings
8% below category average
Survicate
8.5
3 Ratings
2% below category average
Access controls
8.02 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Compliance
8.02 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Satmetrix (discontinued) and Survicate
Satmetrix is best suited if you don't currently use Salesforce. A lot of its main selling points are negated by the virtue of having Salesforce. Case management is in Salesforce, reporting is in Salesforce, the structure that NPX imposes is actually clunky and unwieldy, and is much more streamlined on competing platforms such as GetFeedback and SurveyMonkey. The only thing that leaves is the consultative service on being best practice and I don't really get to see any of that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Survicate is well suited for very basic intercept polls and is less suited for more complex surveying tasks (e.g., anything more than basic skip-logic or surveying niche cohorts) and longitudinal surveying (e.g., comparing responses from the same or similar cohorts year over year).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
In my opinion, inconsistent and visually unappealing survey visuals (e.g., NPS and cSAT questions look completely different from each other, creating a disjointed visual experience)
Poor customer service (in my experience, issue resolution can take weeks)
Lack of clarity around API & other technical capabilities requiring engineering assistance
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The previous experience was so negative that even if they have improved since then it wouldn't help. Another more pertinent reason is because we have an existing 3 year contract with Medallia. Lastly, vendor transitions in our environment (B2B in 132 countries) is extremely painful. I've managed two of them and wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We use Survicate for now, over 7 years, and the tool is being constantly improved. New features and products has been introduced over the years. The team listens to our feedback we sometimes share, and improve the product based on that. We really appreciate being supported by the Customer Success, all the insights and help we got from them. And even though they introduced many new features over the years, the tool still remained super easy to use, even from new employees that join our team
It's rare to use products that offer wide range of features, and yet are really ease to use. Over the years, the product has changed a lot, they introduced numerous new features, but the product remained really simple to use. We know it, because new employees who join our team, have no problem in starting to use Survicate on their own, without and dedicated training. The UI is really clear.
We had a lot of issues during implementation that required help from Survicate's engineers. In my experience, it took us over 4 weeks to be fully up and running due to lag times in communication.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Setup was simple. One-time installation for our website and inside the product. We used Google Tag Manager to implement Survicate. So within 2 hours, we were able to run surveys, and also all attributes and events were passed to Survicate, so that we were able to use them to trigger surveys
I haven't evaluated any other products. Our executive team selected NPS as the preferred measurement of customer sentiment and Satmetrix is the only certification company I am aware of.
Considering the simplicity of the need, and the cost of such solution (~600$/yr), I don't think there was very deep research for any alternatives. The main alternative was embedding a feedback tool "organically" into our site, that option was taken off the table, for strategic considerations.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We had a business need - to collect feedback on our support knowledge base content. Feedback Lite fulfills this need, with simple, easy to use, solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info