Arcserve ShadowProtect vs. VMware Site Recovery Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Arcserve ShadowProtect
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
ShadowProtect, from Arcserve company StorageCraft (merged in March of 2021), supports business continuity with data backup and system protection; the vendor boasts fast system restore capabilities relative to other similar solutions.N/A
VMware SRM
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
VMware's Site Recovery Manager (VMware SRM) is a disaster recovery option, used to automate orchestration of failover and failback to minimize downtime and improve availability with VMware Site Recovery Manager.N/A
Pricing
Arcserve ShadowProtectVMware Site Recovery Manager
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Arcserve ShadowProtectVMware SRM
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Arcserve ShadowProtectVMware Site Recovery Manager
Considered Both Products
Arcserve ShadowProtect
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
Speed, we rely on Shadowprotect to provide us with fast backups and also backups that are smaller in size compared to the other products.
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
Reliable backup and quick and easy to use.
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
Storagecraft SPX runs circles around Veeam in physical or mixed physical/virtual workloads. In a purely virtual environment, I would go with Veeam. Backup Exec lost favor with me years ago. Carbonite is fine for file-level backups to the cloud but isn’t a good DR option because …
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
SPX is much better at backing up Exchange, SQL, any other databases. I love the SPX disaster recovery features compared to other products.
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
ShadowProtect has great technology, and is easily one of the top 5 backup systems out there.
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
ShadowProtect is less expensive than some and more robust than others, and for us, provided a fine medium on which to build our support platform. The MSP interface for SPX makes licenses easy to track and deploy, as well as to retire. Overall, have been satisfied with this …
Chose Arcserve ShadowProtect
We have servers dedicated to backups at our client sites so doing a wholesale hardware replacement is really tough. We also have our own cloud that is fairly young, so we don't want to move to a product that forces us into their cloud. We want to use both our cloud and grow …
VMware SRM
Chose VMware SRM
Veeam Backup & Replication is slower than VMWare SRM and doesn't suits our RTO (Recovery Time Objective).
Chose VMware SRM
If SRM worked as advertised, it would be comparable, however, Veeam also provides you with the ability to create real time labs with your machines, and they can be accessed via a proxy. This allows you to failover some machines and test them from outside the DR bubble.
Chose VMware SRM
[We selected VM Site Recovery Manager based on] VMware Snapshots, functionality and integration.
Chose VMware SRM
Entertained Veeam, however with SRM's tight integration and "brand" it was an easy decision. The cost for a 25 server license also weighed in the decision for using a VMware product. Plus I am a VMware fan and feel this option to go with SRM will transcend jobs.
Features
Arcserve ShadowProtectVMware Site Recovery Manager
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Arcserve ShadowProtect
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
VMware Site Recovery Manager
-
Ratings
Universal recovery8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant recovery8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Recovery verification7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business application protection9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Snapshots6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Flexible deployment7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management dashboard7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform support8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Retention options9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Encryption8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
Arcserve ShadowProtect
8.0
Ratings
6% below category average
VMware Site Recovery Manager
-
Ratings
Continuous data protection9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Replication7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Disaster Recovery
Comparison of Disaster Recovery features of Product A and Product B
Arcserve ShadowProtect
7.0
Ratings
13% below category average
VMware Site Recovery Manager
-
Ratings
Disaster Recovery Planning7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Hot Sites7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Disaster Recovery Testing7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Disaster Recovery7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Arcserve ShadowProtectVMware Site Recovery Manager
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Keepit
Keepit
Score 9.5 out of 10
Keepit
Keepit
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Arcserve ShadowProtectVMware Site Recovery Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Arcserve ShadowProtectVMware Site Recovery Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
If we have a scenario where we need very fast backup/ a lot of backups per hour we tend to go towards ShadowProtect , we have several customers with important servers that we backup each 15 minutes with a VSS consistent snapshot. The continuous incremental option also allows us to create one "full backup" and never again afterwards. This gives us the possibility to give longer retention periods to our customers.
Read full review
SRM is a must-have tool if your business requires you to failover your VMs to a disaster recovery site and provide valid testing and real-time numbers. Our VP office is always amazed at how easily we are able to satisfy our annual testing and show actual results with time stamps and the sequence of each VM that is up and running. SRM may not be needed in a very small business that does not have the capacity nor the need to have their infrastructure off site in a form of a disaster recovery site.
Read full review
Pros
  • Shadowprotect has a relatively simple interface so it's easy to set up.
  • Due to the simple UI, it is easy to restore files.
  • Imagemanage works fairly well once it's set up and doesn't need much babysitting.
Read full review
  • Easy to build a recovery plan
  • Easy to test recovery plans
  • Works with storage based replication or non storage based replication
Read full review
Cons
  • The replication offsite can have issues over time. It takes manual involvement to keep it working right.
  • SPX remote management isn't easy out of the box.
Read full review
  • I am not very pleased with the overall licensing cost. It's pretty expensive. Especially if you have a small number of VMs, you are paying a lot.
  • We had a little struggle getting our support tickets resolved by VMWare support.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
- easy to set up - easy to protect critical servers in case of disaster
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
VMWare SRM is very easy to use and configure. You don't have to be a virtualization expert to learn SRM configuration and execution.
Read full review
Support Rating
We don’t need support often, but when we do, the support has been strong. Sometimes it is hard to determine how to access support for the exact issue we are having. There are a decent forum and online ticketing system. Support for the cloud center seems to be provided only by phone, though.
Read full review
Sometimes we have to struggle explaining the problem and getting it resolved on priority. The overall quality of support team is not as good as it used to be in past.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ShadowProtect is less expensive than some and more robust than others, and for us, provided a fine medium on which to build our support platform. The MSP interface for SPX makes licenses easy to track and deploy, as well as to retire. Overall, have been satisfied with this choice.
Read full review
Veeam Backup & Replication is slower than VMWare SRM and doesn't suits our RTO (Recovery Time Objective).
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It had a positive ROI due to the ability to offer better backup technology to our clients.
  • There is a large up-front fee you need to pay, though, as you need a minimum number of licenses to resell as MSP.
Read full review
  • The biggest positive is that we have a data recovery solution that we can test and verify in a live condition. Prior to this we were only hoping we could recover from a disaster.
  • We've been only running for 4 months and haven't had to use SRM.
Read full review
ScreenShots