TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Sigma

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/ASigma Computing headquartered in San Francisco provides a suite of data services such as code free data modeling, data search and explorating, and related BI and data visualization services.N/A

    Tebra EHR

    Score1 out of 10
    N/ATebra (formerly Kareo) provides a full-featured EHR. It is designed to fit the way its users work. Some key features include: Comprehensive Dashboard, Scheduler, Documentation, and Notes.

    $150

    per provider/per month

    Pricing
    SigmaTebra EHR
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Kareo Practice Management (Low Claim Volume)
    $150
    per provider/per month
    Kareo Practice Management (Unlimited Claims)
    $300
    per provider/per month
    Kareo Billing Services
    Contact sales team
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    SigmaTebra EHR
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsContact us for pricing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    SigmaTebra EHR
    Considered Both Products
    Sigma Computing
    No answer on this topic
    Tebra
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    94%
    Would buy again
    118 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    77 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    116 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    68 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    77 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    SigmaTebra EHR
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Sigma Computing and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    Sigma Computing
    7.5
    163 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Tebra EHR
    -
    Ratings
    Pixel Perfect reports5.4104 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards9.3161 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates7.7133 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Sigma Computing and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    Sigma Computing
    7.5
    166 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Tebra EHR
    -
    Ratings
    Drill-down analysis8.0155 Ratings00 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities7.0163 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages7.35 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration7.7162 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Sigma Computing and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    Sigma Computing
    7.5
    156 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Tebra EHR
    -
    Ratings
    Publish to Web7.3103 Ratings00 Ratings
    Publish to PDF7.7130 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Versioning7.0120 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling7.6132 Ratings00 Ratings
    Delivery to Remote Servers7.968 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Sigma Computing and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    Sigma Computing
    6.8
    149 Ratings
    16% below category average
    Tebra EHR
    -
    Ratings
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)8.6147 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization5.626 Ratings00 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics6.218 Ratings00 Ratings
    Billing and Claims Management
    Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Sigma Computing and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    Sigma Computing
    -
    Ratings
    Tebra EHR
    4.0
    5 Ratings
    61% below category average
    Real-time eligibility verification00 Ratings4.04 Ratings
    Claims management00 Ratings4.04 Ratings
    Coding00 Ratings4.05 Ratings
    Patient Scheduling
    Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Sigma Computing and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    Sigma Computing
    -
    Ratings
    Tebra EHR
    1.0
    4 Ratings
    154% below category average
    Calendar interface00 Ratings1.04 Ratings
    Electronic Medical Records
    Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Sigma Computing and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    Sigma Computing
    -
    Ratings
    Tebra EHR
    2.2
    5 Ratings
    106% below category average
    Charting / document management00 Ratings1.04 Ratings
    Templates00 Ratings2.04 Ratings
    Patient portal00 Ratings1.05 Ratings
    Speech recognition00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Customization00 Ratings1.04 Ratings
    E-prescribing00 Ratings1.03 Ratings
    Medical Security and Privacy
    Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Sigma Computing and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    Sigma Computing
    -
    Ratings
    Tebra EHR
    8.0
    5 Ratings
    4% below category average
    HIPAA compliance00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    SigmaTebra EHR
    Small Businesses
    Cyfe
    Score4 out of 10
    athenaClinicals
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    CareLogic EHR
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Sisense
    Score6.9 out of 10
    Epic
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    SigmaTebra EHR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (170 ratings)
    1.0
    (5 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (6 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.6
    (48 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (47 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    SigmaTebra EHR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Sigma Computing
    We were able to set up client-facing embedded reports with ease and security. The interface is not difficult to learn, although we may not be aware of or lack the necessary expertise to utilize more advanced features that would likely benefit us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    Kareo is not an appropriate application for any real-world clinical need. It is highly unreliable, crashing frequently, and often becomes frozen. It also cannot ingest data from Therapy Notes, which was a promised feature of the platform according to the sales team. Additionally, when we ran into reliability issues (every day, with every clinician at the practice, across a dozen different office locations with different internet service providers) we were not offered the ability to cancel our contract. Until the reliability issues are fixed Kareo is not well-suited to any use case because it does not work.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Sigma Computing
    • Allows end users to easily dive into the data without having direct access to the table in our database management software.
    • Can easily turnaround dashboards that are detailed and visually pleasing.
    • Sigma is intuitive and as new features are rolled out it is easy to adopt and incorporate them into new and existing dashboards.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    • Catching missing patient info
    • Catching missing insurance info
    • Providing mailing addresses
    Read full review
    Cons
    Sigma Computing
    • Sigma Computing does not allow custom ordering of pivot fields in pivot tables easily
    • Sigma Computing lacks functionality for creating tables or sections that dynamically adjust to the browser window's height while maintaining a fixed height textbox at the bottom
    • Sigma Computing does not provide straightforward options for formatting totals in tables, such as renaming 'Total' to 'Average', 'Team Total', etc
    • Sigma Computing does not support searching by individual tab names within a workbook
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    • Everything created can always use adjusting depending on the situation
    • Adapting to client needs quicker
    • Problems are not reported in a timely manner
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Sigma Computing
    Sigma has helped us a lot and has become an integral part of our daily workflow. It would be difficult to switch to another platform and have to rebuild the numerous metrics and performance reports that we have already established
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    Kareo was a massive waste of money. It's an unreliable product without promised features and sold by a disingenuous sales team. We will stick to reliable services like Doxy, Therapy Notes, etc.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Sigma Computing
    It has a clean and modern interface. However, it is not completely intuitive. I think it would be better and easier to navigate with more Windows style drop down menus and/or tabls. There is a significant learning curve, but that may be due in part to the technical nature of this type of software tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    The user interface is fine but it the app constantly freezes or crashes.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Sigma Computing
    Yes, as long as you don’t conduct user error sigma is always up and running and waiting for you to complete your dashboards
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Sigma Computing
    It depends, it loads quickly for smaller dashboards but when loading larger amounts of data it takes more time to do so
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Sigma Computing
    They are very friendly and informative. They are quick in resolving our queries and help us understand very minute things as well. They are quick in creating feature tickets based on our custom requirements, and they would also create a bug ticket if there is any discrepancy and get that checked on time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Sigma Computing
    Was not involved in implementation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Sigma Computing
    With Looker, to be effective, a substantial amount of coding & modeling needs to happen in LookML. Being another language to learn, users have to context switch again from at a minimum either SQL or Python into LookML. The concept of being able to source control, code review, and deploy your models is a plus though.
    Tableau is the gold standard for data visualization, no question. Power users will be able to create dazzling content that Sigma won't necessarily be able to easily match. However, since development usually happens via an extract, helping other users troubleshoot is an arduous process. Trying to re-do or un-do all the transformations and calculations that cause a certain number is very difficult.
    With Sigma, all the queries happen directly against Snowflake and you can see the query logs. The data modeling happens right in a tabular, spreadsheet-like manner, so within only a few minutes, substantial transformations can happen, with visualizations just a few more clicks away.
    Read full review
    Tebra
    I selected Kareo EHR because it was a lot simpler to use and the customer service was definitely better. Every representative I have spoken to has been super friendly and helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Sigma Computing
    It is a cloud service offering that is able to expand based on your usage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Sigma Computing
    • Monitoring health of cloud platform has allowed the company to anticipate issues before they affect customers – Sigma prompted us building a canary monitoring process that provides customer container health.
    • Customer success has used an activity report to discover customers running runaway processes that they were unaware of, creating an alert to contact the customer and prevent an embarrassing situation.
    • Customer success uses the activity report to prompt conversations regarding increases or declines in behavior that led to increasing contract limits or addressing churn concerns.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    • We have negative reviews as we were sold a product that left out some key variables. Things we really needed to make the transition.
    • I don't think KAREO is good for small business (0-10 employees) because their prices for additional or standard features is steep. They charge by the therapist to boot and it is steep!
    • Again ASK questions; do a test run; ask about the migration of your data and its charges.
    • You sign with them you will be locked into a 12 month contract with no out clause. If they are costing you the money you have to stay with them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots