SilkRoad Recruiting

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SilkRoad Recruiting
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
SilkRoad offers OpenHire, a recruiting and ATS system. It offers recruiting access through social media channels, data security, and EEO compliance for mid-sized to large businesses. It is a component of SilkRoad’s Lifesuite product line.N/A
Pricing
SilkRoad Recruiting
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SilkRoad Recruiting
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SilkRoad Recruiting
Considered Both Products
SilkRoad Recruiting
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
Despite using ADP as our HRIS, we are moving our sister company from ADP talent to SilkRoad because we prefer it. It has better functionality and is easier to use.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
SilkRoad was less expensive than Taleo so we chose them instead.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
SilkRoad is definitely an improvement from the previous two [products] we have used. We selected SilkRoad Recruiting because it boasted more features than we were looking for at the time and it also tied into the SilkRoad HRMS system.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
NeoGov is a more simple system but just being able to require specific documents has been a huge time saver for us. Other elements in NeoGov aren't as robust but still it saves me a lot of time compared to OpenHire.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
We also evaluated ADP Virtual Edge. OpenHire looked much nicer, had better functionality and was $30k less. It was so much less that we were able to get Silkroad's RedCarpet system as well.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
I have personally used Brass Ring, Oracle and OpenHire. Of the three OpenHire has provided to most flexible applicant management system. The customization of company specific websites separates OpenHire from the competition.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
I can only really discuss the differences from a candidate side in applying for different roles. OpenHire tends to have a very general styling about it and the application process, while fully customizable to a business' needs, can be a bit cumbersome whereas other applicant …
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
Recruit soft, RecruitMax, what is now Taleo, Kenexa. To be frank, at the time, Openhire was the most cost effective, and it allowed a large amount of users who worked remotely, without having to go to company servers to use the system.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
OpenHire completely streamlined the recruitment process and allowed us to manage the candidates as well as feedback from HM etc. ADP was very aniquated and frustrating to use from a recruitment process. The reporting was awful and it wasn't easy to manage. Definitely not a good …
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
RedCarpet is a SilkRoad product but the features/functionality of the two are completely different.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
I think that UltiPro is much more user friendly. I have only worked through one module but it was very easy and seemed to provide me with all of the information I needed. It seems the hiring managers will have more flexibility to assist with the recruiting piece, which is …
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
I don't have much experience in either. But I know from others that right now, Workday is the top choice and most effective tool out there.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
We used Cyber Recruiter previously. We selected OpenHire as we currently use their other products.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
OpenHire is not nearly as advanced as Kenexa and is probably more on par with iCIMS. I did find iCIMS had some additional functionality and was easier to use than OpenHire. OpenHire's system seems much more fragmented, requiring work arounds than either of the others. I also …
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
I was not part of the selection process for our company.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
I would have to say most Applicant Tracking Systems are very similar. I did find OpenHire easier to add managers to the system than I have in Taleo. I could easily give managers access to be included in the interview process, provide feedback, etc.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
OpenHire is the only one used.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
OpenHire is more straight forward because it caters to smaller organizations and does not have the features that Oracle does. Oracle takes longer to open a position and go through the process because it is geared to larger organizations that have different requirements and …
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
Have used: Kenexa RecruiterCustom ATS applicationTaleo SBESuccessFactors ATS.

OpenHire is a good solution but you have to pick the solution that best first your processes....no one solution can do it all. OpenHire is also a good value.
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
OpenHire stacks up well with its competitors. We selected OpenHire becuse it could manage our requisitions, positions and applicants in a way that other systems couldn't do. However, I don't think that we needed all the bells and whistles that OpenHire offered. We would have …
Chose SilkRoad Recruiting
OpenHire was the best fit for that organization. Very robust user interface, integration and a well managed implementation. No one system is going to do all for each company. I've implemented 9 different systems and used 6 different systems. For me at this company it was the …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
SilkRoad Recruiting
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
SilkRoad Recruiting
6.8
14 Ratings
16% below category average
Job Requisition Management7.214 Ratings
Company Website Posting8.714 Ratings
Publish to Social Media7.812 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting7.813 Ratings
Customized Application Form5.212 Ratings
Resume Management7.014 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention7.213 Ratings
Candidate Search8.714 Ratings
Applicant Tracking8.014 Ratings
Collaboration8.014 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation7.310 Ratings
Email Templates5.714 Ratings
User Permissions3.714 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts4.714 Ratings
Reporting4.714 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SilkRoad Recruiting
Small Businesses
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Vibe HCM
Vibe HCM
Score 4.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SilkRoad Recruiting
Likelihood to Recommend
6.2
(30 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(12 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(3 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
SilkRoad Recruiting
Likelihood to Recommend
SilkRoad
I think OpenHire is best for a small company (max about 2500 employees). The more employees you have the more HR people you should have and this can get expensive. I know most larger companies are using more advanced systems as well (Workday). During the selection process be sure to determine how many OpenHire users you would need. Ask whether your managers will be willing to work in the system as well or whether HR would have to own the entire process. If you are EEOC compliant, make sure you ask about diversity posting, APP tracking of applicants, and reporting needs. If you require an onboarding tool, SilkRoad offers RedCarpet. I found it to be very complex and hiring managers refused to use it. If you require an onboarding tool, definitely look into it. The demo may look great but there were a lot of implementation steps done to make it work and it just didn't fit our company culture. So make sure it fits yours.
Read full review
Pros
SilkRoad
  • The ease of use when it comes to create requisitions from a hiring managers side of things is definitely a positive. It's very much user intuitive and the specifications can be completely customized as to what a company would like to appear within said requisition.
  • Candidate correspondence is an absolute breeze as you can custom load templates into the system that can be edited at any time through an administrator in your company instead of having to go through a technical support team on the other side of things.
  • Overall, it's a pretty no muss no fuss system to use as there's not a great layer of complication about it and like most things, spaced practice and consistent exposure to it tend to iron out those rough edges. From an administration standpoint, adding in locations and hiring managers is incredibly simplistic along with reporting functionality.
  • Candidate folders have come a long way in the system and are much more user friendly at this point than when I began using the system some four years ago. It's very easy to shift candidate profiles between folders and edit on the fly.
Read full review
Cons
SilkRoad
  • OpenHire's user roles can create issues depending on how your company's hiring process flows. For example, at one company, the hiring managers were extremely involved in screening candidates yet the system seems very geared towards use of centralized recruiters who distribute candidates. The lack of ability to customize roles and security to match our managers' needs created additional burden on HR as well as frustration from hiring managers.
  • I experienced several problems uploading documents to accompany a candidate's offer. There was a limit on the number, size and type of attachments that could be included, and there was no alternative (as vetted with OpenHire) besides sending a separate correspondence to the candidate. I found this to appear unprofessional to the candidate as well as creating an extra step in the process for HR/recruiting.
  • The requisition process had a few issues which created inefficiencies in the process. Firstly, for times when you need to post a role confidentially outside of your standard process, there was no way to designate the req as 'confidential'. Instead, you had to use the 'executive' status which created issues (ie: inaccurate data in reporting). Secondly, OpenHire was unable to upload the company directory of emails in the requisition approver fields so rather than being able to select from a drop-down or using a 'smart' field, you had to type each approver's email out manually thus increasing the potential for error and delay in the process.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
SilkRoad
It was a great solution for the company in all aspects, especially the cost. The company was not in a position to afford a solution such as Oracle PeopleSoft. The only reason we did not renew OpenHire was we got acquired by a much larger organization and started utilizing the tools that the parent company had available
Read full review
Usability
SilkRoad
It's not a bad system to use, there just seems to be so much click through to get one task achieved. Once you know all the little routes and pieces it gets easier.
Read full review
Support Rating
SilkRoad
The support for Silkroad is awful. I know they are working on it and it seems to be slightly better but it's still not great. I have had multiple cases I have never heard from them on, others I have had to follow-up multiple times and one that took a year
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
SilkRoad
NeoGov is a more simple system but just being able to require specific documents has been a huge time saver for us. Other elements in NeoGov aren't as robust but still it saves me a lot of time compared to OpenHire.
Read full review
Return on Investment
SilkRoad
  • The cost was very high
  • It made managers more involved in the process
  • It got managers involved earlier than they had been in the past
  • It forced managers to stay involved in their recruiting and not just wait for HR to hire someone
Read full review
ScreenShots