Solutions2Share Teams Manager vs. Spanning Backup

For different projects in a big organization different teams can be formed and thus their internal tasks assignments can be done there. It is easy to manage, assign tasks to people in a particular project. People or team leads in multiple projects can share different channels thus maintaining different projects. Users should be refrained of creating new teams just for fun purpose etc. to avoid to much chaos.

Incentivized

The only issue we have is when we remove the user from the integrated AD group we need to manually go back and remove the licensing, but there is the option to have archived accounts as well for temporary holds in case we want to disable the account in 365/AD, but need to hold on to the backups for a little longer.

Incentivized

• Manage channels - the level of detail of managing what channels are created and how they function is great.
• Manage users - it's easy to manage owners of team sites, along with members and guests.
• Analytics - being able to review how each team site and the channel is being used is extremely helpful and can point out areas of weakness or concern.

Incentivized

• Perpetual email and file backups.
• No limits on backup volume, capacity or file types.
• Excellent Management Console for Administrative users.
• End-user access available for self-management.
• Easy to enable and disable various accounts for backup.
• Easy to restore emails and files from one account to another.

Incentivized

• The video conferencing feature could afford to me a little more user friendly.
• Branding of Microsoft Teams over Skype Needs done.
• Making calls through Teams has not been very successful.

Incentivized

• Thus far, Spanning has completely fulfilled all of our backup needs, and we are completely satisfied.
• While we haven't needed technical support yet, we were told that this is conducted via email rather than via phone.

It is a well-designed and polished application on Teams. Most of its issues stem from Teams UI and UX, which could be improved further. However, if you can fit the team manager to your needs, it can become a very powerful tool to manage data flow.

Incentivized

It was hands down, one of the easiest solutions to implement overall and has some of the best features also compared to other similar products from many SaaS backup companies. We also integrated the Dark Web monitoring too and it has helped us secure accounts we didn't know had issues, so has improved our security posture too.

Incentivized

I would like a retention option on the data, but since this feature does not currently exist, I give it a 9. Everything has met our standards and needs and we are now freed up from the manual efforts it was taking for backing up Salesforce using the out-of-the-box features of Salesforce.

Incentivized

Similar teams meeting management software with totally different functionality. It was used briefly in a one-off trial but was never implemented due to the dominance of Teams and Zoom. It's essential to use software that most people can access, or at least quickly obtain, for holding meetings with people outside of your organization.

Incentivized

Spanning Backup for G Suite backs up Google Drive files and Unitrends is used for more VM infrastructure.

Incentivized

• Being able to manage schedules through a platform we're already using has had a positive impact on ROI
• Overall team success and happiness through Teams has been made possible by the management of the team site by the Team Manager (positive impact on ROI)

Incentivized

• No longer dedicating a resource to manual efforts.
• Less work and money if disaster recovery is needed compared to Salesforce.

Incentivized