Related Quote from Divya Sangtani
backend system in Appian for public apps. For public apps, login & users cost can make it a highly costly app.
Appian has 4 pricing edition(s), from $0 to $60. A free trial of Appian is also available. Look at different pricing editions below and read more information about the product here to see which one is right for you.
Free$0Cloud | Standard$60Cloud per user per month | Flat FeeContact SalesCloud one fixed price per app, unlimited users | EnterpriseContact SalesCloud unlimited number of apps, priced by user |
For the latest information on pricing, visit https://www.appian.com/platform/pricing
Feature | Free Version | Paid Version |
---|---|---|
Phone | Unavailable | Available |
Live Chat | Unavailable | Available |
Unavailable | Available | |
Forum/Community | Unavailable | Available |
FAQ/Knowledgebase | Unavailable | Available |
Social Media | Unavailable | Available |
Video Tutorials / Webinar | Unavailable | Available |
backend system in Appian for public apps. For public apps, login & users cost can make it a highly costly app.
backend system in Appian for public apps. For public apps, login & users cost can make it a highly costly app. … backend system in Appian for public apps. For public apps, login & users cost can make it highly costly app.
company culture. Employees now think on digital solutions. Appian licenses prices sometimes are not profitable at all. Appian enables our company to face
Intelligent automation and Customer management. Since Power apps was more expensive with less features we used Appian to design apps in HRO processes and automated … Appian's pricing model and co-selling is more interesting than that of Power platform. We
employees. It was also well suited for repetitive tasks for litmus tests and value generation calculations. I have tried Pega also, but Appian has mastered … and train. Work on initial to advanced task easily. Maintain and organise values and create documentation easily.…
Quite expensive platform starting at $75 per feature per month Difficult to implement
I personally think Appian will win the discussion of pricing between itself and Microsoft Power Automate currently, but since I don't … Price Product Features Product Reputation … Price, security, automation capabilities
We used custom BPM solutions in the past and find greater value in using Appian. I was not a part of the architecture team that reviewed
businesses would benefit from using Appian, I'm just not sure they could afford the cost for something as simple as a basic website.
with Appian are almost endless. The part that weighs Appian down is the expensive cost of licenses for users. … Expensive Licensing No option for a limited user Able to save users time with new
Business is still using it Appian has added a value to our business, and we are happy about it
Cost Savings
Creation and execution of Test cases Patterns for DB Maintenance simple Value setting of variables outside of interfaces.
of our workforce, using a tool like Appian allows us to leverage more expensive managers with our emergent coding organization. … Appian has lowered our cost of development. Decreased our time to market. Exte…
License model is rigid and expensive Hard to include end customer processes due to named user licenses or big … business life just easier. And it saves you a LOT of money, even so it is expensive IF you have the fitting size and use cases.
Appian is used [within] the company. My [department] is in charge of developing tools for the rest of the departments. Appian is helping us a lot for the
Avoid human errors. Provide guidance through company processes. Generate value added in terms business intelligence. … the new features. For new developers, it is easy to learn and start adding value to the company really fast which is a really important thing.
edition. Later management reviewed various other vendors, and based on the price and functionality Appian was selected.
refresh data from prod to sandbox - auto-scaling The pros of Appian are: - cost - no limit on API calls - great professional services teams - easy to get
Perceived as easier to operate and significantly lower cost to implement when originally implemented. I do believe Pega has become more
robust and mature product in a similar price range. Other commercial products in this arena are much more expensive.
charts and graphs. I don't believe that Appian should be used to replace any cost accounting type of functions. There are enterprise systems, such as Oracle … Time Gain: Decrease in man hours to automate manual processing. Cost Savings: In house development, not paying Contractors…
improved with more in-depth hands-on technical sessions offered free of charge. Need to follow up on the customer journey, especially in the early implementation
of Appian in order to meet two primary objectives, one to replace older expensive technologies that no longer satisfied our objectives and to implement new