Overall Satisfaction with Appian
We started using Appian about 2 years ago, and now we are introducing Appian initiatives and solutions across all business units, manly finding a new modern and automated solutions to day-to-day processes that are manual or using old tools. Another target is to achieve connectivity and integration between different applications within the Appian platform and out of the Appian platform.
- Quick and rapid designing and implementation of process and application (including workflows and UI).
- Easy integration between applications within Appian and out of Appian platform.
- Unified look and feel of implemented sites and navigation between applications.
- Expression Rule Editor has a lot of room for improvement, as it is not as easy as other IDE internment
- Adding features to debug and trace code in editors and process models.
- Adding features to accept anonymous objects in process model instead of just strong typed objects.
- A better way to handle multiple calls for smart activities in a process model.
- More easy ways to navigate objects in the Designer tool
- The business users already are showing excitement to the idea that they can convert their manual process into automated and computerized process.
- Managers are happy to find a place where they can track work and get a quick idea about how progress or lack of is there.
- Pega Platform and .NET
Against programming languages like .NET and Java, Appian is faster to design and develop applications, but it lacks the flexibility in UI and advanced debugging tools. Against Pega, Appian is easier to use and less expensive.