Jama Connect Pricing

project, but I would say it could easily save an organization more than its cost in terms of improving efficiencies and the traceability integrity throughout

Price for number of seats

- Ease of use - Straightforward set of features - Cost-effective (due to the fact that we've been customers of Jama Connect for

SKAO being a non-profit organization, the main goal is delivering maximum value for the system being designed and later implemented, and having an agile … The third-party professional services are included in the Jama price, and helped with the initial setup, and also provided…

the cost is quite expensive thta's why it is mainly adopted by company needing to meet compliancy to standards. Non regulated SW will choose cheaper tools … integration to other tools (planview is a contrainth) high license fee + extra cost for integration or for features like AI assistant 8 … and compliance to standards. However, difficulties…

customers (reqif) transparency with customers during the development very low cost of maintenance during the development (versioning, etc.)

was the perfect balance between cost, usability and scalability that our company desired. Helix was definitely cheaper but didn't offer the usability or … or scalability perks. Codebeamer missed the mark on cost and was designed more for a software centric requirement management…

buy-in from the organization to see value early. My experience with this tool was very positive and we were able to see value early in its introduction.

The canonical low-cost option is Excel which is not feature complete from a requirements development … repository of requirements, design features, and verifications. Excel is the low-cost/low-feature requirements management solution. It's limitation to being a

to streamline the approval process of our sales. Depending on the dollar value of some of our bookings, there needs to go through a certain number stage

Efficient requirements management. Streamlined SDLC. Cost saving.

failed. In the end we paid annual fee for Jama Connect and Tasktop TIH together at the minimum level. The overall cost of Jira/Confluence/Jama/Tasktop is … Requirements and traceability are clear. The tool is expensive compared to JIRA/Confluence for a small company. We … would think that Jama would h…

been more than satisfied in that regard. This has provided us significant value in the positive side effects of getting our requirements management under … management piece better than anyone else, which is why we chose it. The cost was hard to swallow, given the limitations…

I'm in charge of Jama Connect Configuration and roll out for Energy Management Business. We implement Jama Connect for Requirements and Test Management

Price Product Features Product Usability Prior Experience with the Product Vendor … available for some of the automation which creates problems and adds extra cost to manage the resources doi…

connector is no longer inbuilt and requires expensive third-party tools from OPS HUB or Tasktop. Maybe cost prohibitive for Small and Medium Enterprises

I don't have the numbers/cost per user license vs increased revenues but overall, the use of and recommendation

find it a little difficult to use Jama. Price may be an issue for many. It is a cost per user and it is more expensive that other cloud tools we use, with … team's collaboration on requirements reviews. We are not sure yet if the cost for this software is worth paying for…

internal service offering to all company project teams. It was offered free of charge to any client we were supporting as a requirements management tool and also