Control-MPricing

Cost Savings Business expansion Increased revenue Saved lots of MAN hours

ability to incorporate executions with Java Scripting to obtain variable values ​​or to order processes natively in the application using its utilities … Implementation of Manage File Transfer B2B for external clients at no additional cost.

Reduction of manual effort in running and monitoring process, leds to cost savings Ability to integrate easily with external partners for data transfer

SAP env. We also move apps from the Cloud back to OnPremises (due to high cost) and Control-M will be an important team player in that transformation.

cost/pricing … Good BMC support is quick Bmc should consider cost effectiveness for long term clients during license renewal 10500 … modern technologies, a more user-friendly interface, and potentially lower cost of ownership compared to older Control-M versions. Key…

Control-M to handle workflows instead of individual tasks, because Control-M charges by the number of jobs ordered out daily. Putting ETL processes into workflows … scripts or Databricks Workflows is probably the best practice to control cost.

processes allowing a shorter availability time of the central systems. High cost.

native application. For On-prem environment also licensing model need to be cost effective. Security patches and features need to be releases more frequently

I don't know that I can speak to that. I don't know the cost and the financing. I don't really set the business objectives.

clairty on pricing structure vs competition

Cost Savings - by automating manual tasks we're able to reduce man-hours and be

The total cost of ownership and innovations are best in product. We even migrated away

suitable for large volumes of processing. Control-M is not suitable when low cost is required or for low volumes of processes.

Better logging Open API pricing model

Man power, cost saving Less risk BIM alerts us when we're missing deadlines

Cost savings Increased revenue

issues, resulting in significant time savings and cost-effectiveness. Airflow is open source so no cost in terms of licensing however, that requires a lot … As far as I know, the cost of having Control-M is too high but, not sure about the ROI though. I think

I am not involved in cost estimation and analysis. Service is good and fast.

Except for the cost, it is the best and most complete workload automation tool.

I don’t deal with cost

Control-M's every function's usability provides value to our business.

functionality when they release new version reduce the license cost Build in Workflow insight at free of cost … help to take decision quick and reduce the downtime. In directly reduce the cost factor . Application feasibility and easy integration helped us to stay ahead … change…

flow. This module is not included in the base price but is available at a relatively small additional cost. Using Control-M's GUI (the Enterprise Manager) … spent many man-hours developing the batch. We could migrate to slightly cheaper products but that would require projects…

Better savings in resource optimization. Cost reduction by eliminating other siloed tools Critical Incident reduction and

applications via Control Modules. Control-M APIs are very powerful and expensive used to integrate with other applications which don't have control modules … We recently migrate mainframe job from CA7 to Control-M due to the pricing and new features in Control-M. … sending the global conditions. Reduce the cross a…