Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

I think it's best suited for all the monolithic application where you just need a VM and you on top of that VM you need to install a compatible product. So it's best suited for those. Where's not suited. As I said, maybe I've seen in my organization mostly our internal application teams, they go for a different operating system for appliances or network maybe it might be due to the product compatibility, not with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), but that's something maybe you should have a look or probably it's not a improvement anywhere.

So anyone that's running an application that runs on a Linux distribution, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)'s a great option for that. Things that aren't going to work well with it. A lot of times vendors provide their own custom build operating system. So you can't use Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) in that instance.

I would say for enterprise server management for just essentially servers that don't require GUI or that you want to run in a kind of secure, standalone fashion. I think it does become difficult with integrating with different identity providers. So that can be a pain point as far as integration with active directory or any kind of ldap. But I would say as far as just being able to provide confidence that you're deploying a secure product from the outset and that it serves the needs of the different infrastructure as far as compatibility with a lot of software that's built on the platform. So I think it's really helpful for serving that server software in the cloud or on virtual machines wherever.

It’s about it to scale, manage, efficiency of resource utilization, flexibility, and automation platforms

Running vms. Less standalone test stands

Tho os great at being stable for our base image

After a Nessus scan, there are many changes that need to be made manually. Following the instructions, most of these scenarios can be easily resolved, but there are a few that require a lot of work to solve. It would be nice to have a pre-hardened version that can be installed directly.

Keeping our servers up to date with automated patching. And support.

Stability of service

Requires less resources in an OnPrem environment, compared to windows

Excellent product

RHEL is a good enterprise option for linux

I would use RHEL for some applications, I would not use it as an authentication source.

We use RHEL for all developing and infrastructure environments. It gives us the capabilities to secure our systems they that follows policies.

I've been an administrator for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) for more than 10 years now. I can't really imagine using another OS. Nothing else has the same combination of features, security, and power.

It’s very used the Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) in the business because it’s secure and easy to work.
the coworker feels comfortable with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL).
when the system is emergency mode it’s very easy , come back to o.s. It’s no difficult and the apps works very well.
in the other the vulnerability it’s very quickly and de deployment with Ansible

Rapid deployment and excellent interoperability during installation for both public-facing and internal systems. Very good management tools for existing and new nodes.

General system administration, development, server hosting, and secure environment networking. In my opinion all see to be Red Hat Enterprise Linux's strong suites.

Use as a thin client requires effort and custom software to restrict functions and features.

RHEL desktop systems are an excellent solution for air-gapped networks due to Red Hat's patch management framework.

RHEL is very versatile and easy to use and great customer support. We have been RHEL customer for several years. Very satisfied.

Security and compliance out of the box. May be overkill for more basic DIY applications.

I have an over all good experience with RHEL during a work environment. I have also used it in a lab environment at home where I would install additional applications on RHEL 6 7 and even RHEL 8. I can't think of anything scenarios where it would not be appropriate

it is way more faster and more efficient for deploy anything. it works well and we have begun to roll out for workstation

provides a better platform for development for K8s