Absorb LMS Strong Automation and Reporting at Scale
Overall Satisfaction with Absorb LMS
We use Absorb LMS for organizational learning and serve all internal employees for onboarding, compliance, role-based & voluntary learning using all course types such as Online Courses, Instructor-Led Courses, and complex learning paths (Curricula). We have business-owned learning content within a defined governance framework. Next, we will focus more on the manager experience, improve reporting & compliance, and also analytics.
Pros
- Overall, Absorb LMS is pretty easy to use for learners and especially for admins. It's practical to create and manage course content - it provides the most crucial options and yet is lean enough not to overcomplicate the admin's life. The consistent and customizable "table-view" in most of the admin-areas is very helpful and easy to follow.
- Using Enrollment Rules, Absorb LMS let you define who a course applies to and how they get enrolled. You can build rules based on learner attributes, such as department, location job role, group, to include or exclude specific audiences. The way Absorb LMS is using enrollment attributes, no other LMS actually can fulfill our requirements easier. Enrollment rules are mainly embedded in individual course options (you can also create scheduled enrollments outside of the courses).
Cons
- Absorb LMS falls behind a couple other LMS that are very strong in AI-specific special approaches (such as AI-agents) that are in place already within competitors but Absorb LMS has announced promising AI agents (for learners and admins) for 2026 so we're very excited.
- Very slow handling of public-facing ideas portal for feature requests.
- Premium features add cost: add-ons like "together" (new coaching module) and others, require separate packages/licensing. On the other hand, Absorb LMS's model keeps the main LMS feature more affordable in comparison to other LMS providers.
- Absorb LMS has made a real difference in how smoothly we run training. By automating enrollments and standardizing how we assign key courses, we spend much less time on manual admin and chasing people for completions. Onboarding is also easier now because required learning paths live in one place, so our New Hires ramp up faster, and managers get fewer “what does my team need to take?” questions. The biggest win is simply having cleaner, more reliable data when we need it for reporting or audits.
- From a global quality and standardization point of view, Absorb LMS has been the backbone for scaling learning without things turning into chaos. It has helped us bring more structure and governance, so we can actually see what’s being created, who it is meant for, and whether the right settings are in place. That means a better experience for learners (less noise, more relevant assignments) and more confidence for the business that our training records are accurate and easy to validate.
- Reporting & Insights (Absorb Analyze or Absorb Amplify Direct)
- Ecosystem Integrations (Absorb APIs or Absorb Connectors)
- Intelligent Recommendations
- Social Learning (Absorb Engage)
We've just started using Absorb Analyze and don't have much experience with it yet. However, it seems like a more comprehensive way to create reporting than what the default LMS provides.
Absorb offers various integrations, we're using scheduled data imports and exports, for course progress and for learner metadata import. Without these, it would be very difficult to maintain our learners - this is a must-have requirement to all LMS providers.
The intelligent recommendations and social learning part do fulfill their job. The social learning module is slightly weaker in Absorb LMS compared to other providers with a more modern approach.
Absorb offers various integrations, we're using scheduled data imports and exports, for course progress and for learner metadata import. Without these, it would be very difficult to maintain our learners - this is a must-have requirement to all LMS providers.
The intelligent recommendations and social learning part do fulfill their job. The social learning module is slightly weaker in Absorb LMS compared to other providers with a more modern approach.
We evaluated a few well-known LMS options, including Docebo, Cornerstone, and MindTickle. Each has strengths (especially in very specific use cases), but we selected Absorb LMS because it matched our priorities best: value for money, global scalability, straightforward administration, reliable enrollments/automation, and reporting that supports governance and compliance needs.
In short: other tools had impressive feature sets, but Absorb LMS was the one that felt most practical and sustainable for our organization, especially with many stakeholders and Power Users involved. Already back in 2019 when we first evaluated and implemented Absorb LMS, and also after the re-evaluation last year.
In short: other tools had impressive feature sets, but Absorb LMS was the one that felt most practical and sustainable for our organization, especially with many stakeholders and Power Users involved. Already back in 2019 when we first evaluated and implemented Absorb LMS, and also after the re-evaluation last year.
Do you think Absorb LMS delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Absorb LMS's feature set?
Yes
Did Absorb LMS live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Absorb LMS go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Absorb LMS again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation