We love this thing!!
Overall Satisfaction with Acumatica
We use it to process time and billing for third party administration services and actuarial services, as well as for invoice delivery and payment reconciliation.
Pros
- extremely customizable
- dashboarding and self-service reporting
- automated time entry
- integration with enterprise internally accounting system and general ledger
Cons
- More focus on professional services modules and use in the corporate space.
- Further expansion of self service reporting, as well as scheduled reporting and aggregate data feeds to lake structures
- Policing bad partner vendor code
- 4-figure FTE hour savings by streamlining time tracking
- Allows for faster AR reconciliation
7-12 months
Better invoicing practices and better tracking of aged AR
We use it to track time entry for professional services.
- Oracle APEX and ASAPP Customer Experience Performance (CXP)
Do you think Acumatica delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Acumatica's feature set?
Yes
Did Acumatica live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Acumatica go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Acumatica again?
Yes
Acumatica Feature Ratings
Using Acumatica
1000 - Client services and support, project accounting, associate hour tracking.
3 - Technical and report writer-skilled, require solid application support skillsets, as well as some low-code experience.
- Time and Billing
- Signed Agreement Management
- Project Accounting
- Invoice Delivery
- Customized Reporting
- Project accounting before Professional Services model
- scaled corporate time and billing
- client engagement
- billing and AR recognition
Evaluating Acumatica and Competitors
- Scalability
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
Integration with current processes, price point per user and solid support.
I would broaden the scope to include some previously missed use-cases and operational workflows.


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation