Adobe Acrobat: It gets the job done
Updated November 20, 2024
Adobe Acrobat: It gets the job done

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Adobe Acrobat
I use Acrobat Acrobat primarily to preflight client submitted PDF files for color separations, to create interactive forms, and to extract elements or pages for publication assembly. It's not a great tool for editing: the best way to edit a PDF is to make the changes in the original software that made it, be that Illustrator, InDesign, Photoshop or whatever you've used to create the PDF, but for simple edits, such as changing a date, correcting a misspelled word, or deleting unwanted elements, it's sufficient. It's also valuable for setting up security when sending proofs to new clients, in order to prevent them from casually using proofs as artwork, and you can password protect features such as editing and printing resolution. Another nice feature which I find myself using a lot, is editing of scanned text; Adobe Acrobat works as good if not better in a lot of cases at converting scanned text to editable text than even some dedicated OCR software that I've used, and that can be a time saver.
Pros
- Preflighting
- OCR
- PDF Security
Cons
- Editing is rather weak
- Form field creation can be a bit tedious
- Ruler 0 point repositioning would be nice
- Preflighting
- OCR
- Page and element extraction
- It has always been a factor in speeding up workflow
- Fewer errors when converting scanned text to editable text
- Fast to launch, and doesn't consume a lot of resources
- Ease of Use
Adobe Acrobat has been the standard for years, has a light footprint, and does what it does quite well.
I've never experienced compromise of my user data or account information due to a security breach at Adobe. The same can't be said for credit rating agencies.
There's not really anything I've used before that's similar to Acrobat.
Do you think Adobe Acrobat delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Adobe Acrobat's feature set?
Yes
Did Adobe Acrobat live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Adobe Acrobat go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Adobe Acrobat again?
Yes
Using Adobe Acrobat
1 - Owner and Graphic Designer
Acrobat require no in-house support
- Previewing
- Preflighting
- Editing
- Separations
- Forms
- OCR of scanned documents
- There really aren't any.
Evaluating Adobe Acrobat and Competitors
I might consider alternative PDF tools now that more companies offer them beyond just Adobe.
Adobe Acrobat Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Change management was minimal - None
- There were none
Adobe Acrobat Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
None | None |
There was no need for premium support. It's not a production tool, simply a prepress tool to double check final files and do minor edits if needed.
Using Adobe Acrobat
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | Slow to learn |
- File Optimization
- Preflghting
- OCR
- Editing

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation