InDesign offers power, but you need to be careful about how you use it
Overall Satisfaction with Adobe InDesign
I use InDesign to develop printed marketing materials ranging from business cards to brochures. The ease of usability, especially when it comes to updating graphics on a regular basis, makes InDesign my go-to for developing our frequently used printed materials. I also use it to create PDF files that are easy to search and browse, making for a more immersive experience on a computer or mobile device.
Pros
- Incorporates graphics from Illustrator and Photoshop.
- Makes searchable PDFs more intelligent.
Cons
- It is a bit of a resource hog. For best results, double the suggested RAM and scratch disk space.
- Sometimes the library items don't update as fast as other Adobe products.
- The learning curve is steep, especially if you haven't used other Adobe products. Be sure to factor in the learning time into your ROI and time calculations.
- Materials designed with InDesign tend to look more professional than those designed with alternatives like Microsoft Publisher. This tends to improve "curb appeal".
Publisher and Quark both work, but they don't play well with Adobe products, which makes you waste a lot of time converting Illustrator and Photoshop files into bitmaps for use in them. This can lead to issues with image quality, on top of wasting time and energy. The similarity and familiarity of InDesign menus and toolbars for experienced users of Illustrator, Photoshop and other Adobe products speeds up the learning time.
Do you think Adobe InDesign delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Adobe InDesign's feature set?
Yes
Did Adobe InDesign live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Adobe InDesign go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Adobe InDesign again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation