Overall Satisfaction with Adobe Sign
The primary purpose of Adobe Sign is for management and [the] secure use of electronic signatures used by staff in order to fulfill any company process that requires a signature on a document. It also provides the cryptography necessary along with an appropriate audit trail to provide process evidence in the worst-case scenario if my company has to provide any evidence in a court of law to demonstrate a binding contract.
- Integration into Office 365 with Microsoft Flow [(currently named Power Automate)]
- Simple to use interface and navigation
- Integration with SharePoint
- Customer Support
- Pricing
- Documentation concerning integration into third-party services, like Office 365
- [It] saves time as it's easier to sign documents.
- [It] saves money as it eliminated the need to FedEx documents overseas to clients.
- [It] allows administrators to track the signature process, save, and retrieve signed documents easier.
Do you think Adobe Acrobat Sign delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Adobe Acrobat Sign's feature set?
Yes
Did Adobe Acrobat Sign live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Adobe Acrobat Sign go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Adobe Acrobat Sign again?
Yes
- OneSpan Sign (formerly eSignLive)
In my testing, both products carry out the same functions and they do it well, but Adobe Sign's advantage is its integration with office 365 especially in terms [of] integration with Sharepoint which was seamless in comparison [to] using Microsoft Flow [(now called Power Automate)]. Adobe Sign's interface in my opinion was a bit better and more intuitive. However, that conclusion is subjective as Onespan's interface was pretty good as well.