Makes developers life easier!
Overall Satisfaction with BrowserStack
So currently we are using BrowserStack Live, Automate, and Percy to test and maintain our product. So first we run Percy to check if we have any regressions due to the current development, Then for production E2e we run it with Selenium on Automate, and also we perform manual testing on Live devices.
Pros
- Verifying the snapshots of whole application with Percy
- Logging and monitoring the e2e with Automate
- Manual testing on multiple real devices, that is really cool
Cons
- Percy is somehow not performing that well, we have some issues with executing JS
- Automate Session issues, so sometime it's unable to open the driver session
- Percy Snapshots comparison
- E2E execution and monitoring with recordings
- Live Devices
- Improved Automated testing
- Improved productivity
- faster development
This is true, we are saving a lot of manual effort due to Percy and Automate, and our product is more stable. Percy is very useful, it finds the bugs in very early phase, we run Percyw in our ci-cd after the development changes, so with the development ongoing we can check the regressions for the Product.
So I didn't use any other products, so I can not provide any more feedback on this one.
Do you think BrowserStack delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with BrowserStack's feature set?
Yes
Did BrowserStack live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of BrowserStack go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy BrowserStack again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation