Your go to solution for Cross Browser Testing.
September 30, 2024

Your go to solution for Cross Browser Testing.

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Software Version

Enterprise

Overall Satisfaction with BrowserStack

We use BrowserStack Live, BStack Automate, and Percy. The use cases are mostly web-based applications, so developing and testing them across various browsers and devices becomes very important. Additionally, including Testing as part of the CI/CD model makes visual testing even more relevant, which is where Percy comes into the picture.

Pros

  • Cross Browser and Device Testing.
  • Visual Testing.
  • Wide Variety of testing from Geolocation to WCAG.
  • Day 0 availability of new devices.
  • Real Device testing.
  • Local Testing.

Cons

  • Accessibility Dashboard is not intuitive.
  • Percy can use AI based recognition.
  • Including more features in a 14 day trial.
  • BStack Live.
  • Customer Support.
  • Visual Test.
  • Scaling up testing.
  • Including in Dev/Design phases.
  • Shift Left Testing.
Cross-browser testing was a massive challenge as one had to pay for devices, and emulators can only take you so far. There were issues regarding minor versions of iOS devices, which were resolved after BStack.
  • Live
Cross Browser Testing Cross Device Testing Geolocation Screen Reader testing Local Testing.
SauceLabs was not intuitive. The launch response time was too high. It didn't offer flexibility in debugging, and the other testing features were not easily available.

Do you think BrowserStack delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with BrowserStack's feature set?

Yes

Did BrowserStack live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of BrowserStack go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy BrowserStack again?

Yes

It is well suited for Cross-Browser testing early in a product's life cycle. It is less appropriate when emulator-based testing is needed.

Comments

More Reviews of BrowserStack