Cost of Compliance and Reliability
Overall Satisfaction with MasterControl Quality Excellence
We implemented documents and training (full modules) and supplier/BOM (partial modules). Generally, having document and records in one place make access to documents and their approvals simpler than managing share points and individual DocuSign accounts - especially when managing organization changes. With the connectivity of the modules, it makes processes more efficient and allows management to have visibility at macro and micro levels of the organization.
Pros
- Organizes information
- Process transparency
- Part 11 Compliance
Cons
- Industry specific pre-built templates
- Differentiation of role capabilities in collaboration
- User defined sorting of drop downs
- Eliminated the need for additional tools with subscriptions
- Using released forms as templates for records ensures that users are provided the template required automatically
- Audit trails ensure accountability is appropriate and visible
Validation on demand makes implementation so much easier and compliant. I have seen companies roll-out systems in silos and not embrace connectivity between systems which always create a lot of duplication between systems and no single source of truth. I have used other systems that were built on weak SQL infrastructure and couldn’t hold up to stress testing and the developers did not perform adequate regression testing so every time they fixed something or introduced something new they broke something else.
Do you think MasterControl Quality Excellence delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with MasterControl Quality Excellence's feature set?
Yes
Did MasterControl Quality Excellence live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of MasterControl Quality Excellence go as expected?
No
Would you buy MasterControl Quality Excellence again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation