Item: Miro
Rating: 9
Author: Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use it within our design team as a way to remotely collaborate with team members in various locations and to ideate around concepts that we are exploring or breaking down.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Ideation sessions
Whiteboarding
Wireframing

Cons

Reviewing missed changes while you were gone.

Implementation Rating

I wasn't the implementer but there weren't any issues I was aware of, beyond the need for adding additional licenses after some time.

Ease of Integration

I wasn't involved in integration, but it was smooth to my knowledge.

Collaboration

Greater visibility and easier collaboration for teams who are scattered in different locations.

Key Insights

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

For higher fidelity design work we use Figma, but Miro is better for brainstorming and ideating, as Figma can be too advanced for non-designers, and not having to worry about layer structure, etc is a nice thing to avoid distracting people. It also has a ton of great integrations built into it that make for powerful sessions.

Other Software Used

Figma

Likelihood to Recommend

Great for real-time collaboration and ideating. It doesn't feel like a real whiteboard experience as if you're together in a room, but if you think of it as a different way of accomplishing similar results, it has a lot of power (in many ways more).

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

Best tool for remote designer collaboration and ideation so far!