Easy interaction
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
As architecture educators, we desperately need face-to-face training. because we examine many images, drawings and models produced together with the students. That's why we should make as much use of the interaction possibilities as possible. Miro has provided us with some interaction opportunities that we lost in distance education. We use miro as an interaction tool with students integrated with zoom in online education.
Pros
- Simultaneous interaction
- Low computing load
- Focus with cursor tracking
Cons
- Need new solution for pdf processing
- On mobile devices, if the page’s computing load is high, the app may close (for example iPad pro)
- Vector-based objects can overwhelm the system. The may be options such as converting them to pixel-based objects
- Easy interaction
- Participatory work
- Easy tracking of jobs
It does not have a significant contribution to the projects compared to the interaction in the physical environment. We still need the interaction possibilities brought by the physical environment. But miro is a serious step in increasing online interaction opportunities. This interaction isn't just about the application, it's about the computing power of computers, their communication speed, and even human evolution.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
- MURAL (formerly Mural.ly) and Trello
Because the interaction possibilities and stability are by far greater
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation