Overall Satisfaction with Miro
As a lecturer in high education (degrees and master courses) I use Miro in my classes. During lockdown and online classes, it was one of my best solutions to keep students involved, as Miro allowed us to have collaborative, on-time, and diverse work. Now, that we came back on face-to-face classes I still use this tool to promote collaborative work, especially homework, but I'm wondering how can I include more in-class exercises.
- Get together a team working at the same time.
- Infinite possibilities of layouts, but also a lot of templates really good
- Possibility of using different kinds of formats (text, ppt, iamges, etc)
- Possibility of prepare frames in advance but don't let participants see until we want.
- I can't figure it out because everything I need is there!
- Improved engagement between students, students and teacher, and students and content.
I'm not sure about the sense of this question.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Miro is excellent for collaborative work among students, and also students and teachers. It has a lot of features that allow a use not only for online classes but also as a tool to support face-to-face classes and autonomous work. I really recommend it!