Overall Satisfaction with NICE CXone (formerly NICE inContact)
It is being used by the entire organization, from technicians to management. We contact customers and partners when we identify fraud or attempts, and we also receive calls from customers and the call center when the customer himself identifies unusual behavior in checking account or credit card transactions that are being improperly approved.
- Good sounding calls
- It doesn't [fail] often
- Easy understanding
- Mute button too close to end button
- Two clicks when finished
- Delay to initiate call
- Shortest dial attempt
- Considerable return
- Increased wait to complete call
As I am only part of customer service, I do not work in this specific sector to customize the tool. I can only give my opinion regarding the operation of the tool, which has improved, for example, the issue of completing calls. In the old tool, when dialing the numbers, was trying to look for the signal for a long time, and ended even before giving the first ring.
Yes - The Verisys Toolbar system was replaced, I believe because the system falls too low, often leaving the entire company unable to communicate. [This] result[ed] in financial losses, since each card has a time limit to be treated, and a company can spend more than five hours without a system.
Do you think NICE CXone delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with NICE CXone's feature set?
Yes
Did NICE CXone live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of NICE CXone go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy NICE CXone again?
Yes