Overall Satisfaction with TestComplete
TestComplete is being used across the organization for multiple purposes. The QA Team uses it for their functional and regression testing, and the same is being used to test the integration by the Devs. The BAs and other businesses use it to get the UAT. Before, we put our applications into the production environment.
- Decreased the total time for RTM.
- Increased productivity and bug finding, as users don't need to do regression every time.
- Improved overall quality of the application going into production.
UFT, TOSCA, and open-source Selenium/Cucumber based. The ease of use with TestComplete is comparable to TOSCA, but it is a lot cheaper and allows for a better ROI. UFT is better at recognizing elements and different technologies based on Java. TestComplete is easier to set up and start using and integrates well with tools available in the Cloud.
Great tool for testing across UI, API, and DB testing. It is excellent for use with .NET applications and development. It allows for easy use of visual cues to identify and ensure that all systems can be recognized and has good debugging, although that lacks a bit in stepwise debugging and needs improvement. System testing is easy, but unit testing might require a bit more planning to work out. API's in REST is good and SOAP can also be done.