Completely Test with TestComplete
July 26, 2021

Completely Test with TestComplete

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with TestComplete

TestComplete is used solely within the Quality department at my organization and is used to test the web application portion of our product. We maintain a bank of test scripts that we developed, and are planning to integrate the execution of the test scripts into our CI/CD pipeline in the near future.
  • Visual test script development.
  • Script based back end for focusing in on specific UI elements.
  • Well laid out GUI for organizing and executing test cases.
  • Automatic capture and reporting of test case execution results.
  • Visual recognition is a feature we don't use due to it not being as accurate as the scripting feature.
  • It has allowed us to move a bunch of our manual testing to automated testing resulting in reduced testing time between deployments.
I've previously used Ranorex Studio as an intern and found it to be a decent solution. I think that TestComplete is a bit more mature in comparison, and integrates well within our test environment.
TestComplete is best suited for testing web applications that are well developed and have unique element IDs implemented. I believe that it is less appropriate for highly dynamic apps with lots of layers and elements that are unlabeled. Our web app is JS-based and features a lot of nesting, which seems to confuse TestComplete at times, however requesting our dev team to add unique element IDs to the critical elements seems to remove this issue, and elements are readily identifiable by TestComplete.