Functional testing using TestComplete
December 11, 2021
Functional testing using TestComplete

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with TestComplete
We are in the Insurance and Travel business. Lots of our web applications are re-developed and re-designed. We decided to evaluate the test automation tools to align with our applications. Most applications are web platforms and Mobile. The whole idea was to use the tools to perform SmokeTest and Functional testing whenever we needed.
Pros
- Smoke Test
- Functional Test
- Unit Test
- Azure DevOps integration
Cons
- Test Suite runs - Running test Suite (improvements)
- Name Mapping issue
- Scripting
- Perfect tools for recording and playing back
- Name mapping issue [causing] some issues and user needs to adjust the recording most of the time when name mapping changes
- QI - this tool is a great extension and helps to resolve the name mapping issue. Has to be purchased separately.
Based on my evaluation regards to the product cost, useability, the TestComplete came first on my selections.
Do you think TestComplete delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with TestComplete's feature set?
Yes
Did TestComplete live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of TestComplete go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy TestComplete again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation