Overall Satisfaction with Visual Studio IDE
Our company uses mostly Linux based tech, but from time-to-time, we do arrive at Windows-based tasks. In those cases, using Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code are our main tools for tackling problems. Mostly used for C# and C++ codes, sometimes TypeScript, we use Visual Studio as a reliable, modern, and highly valuable IDE.
- Windows-based programming tools
- .NET go-to developing instrument
- Well structured, easy-to-use interface
- Has a steep learning curve
- Intellisense is sometimes a bit annoying for me
- Wide language support
- Close windows integration
- Designer tools and other utilities
- We were able to reach out [to] companies, who had smaller scale windows based tasks as well, so we could be ahead of "only Linux based systems" companies
- Microsoft Visual Studio Code, Atom, Notepad++, IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, WebStorm, NetBeans and Eclipse
It's a well [maintained], mature IDE, which has the benefit of being a [software] which only the most skilled developers works on, instead of being open source. It has a lot of very useful features, which most free IDE-s don't. Also, it has many options from commercial [license] to free usage, which is a big plus for educational introduction. Visual Studio was the first IDE I used as a professional, and ever since I find myself returning to it from time to time to only see how much it has grown.
Do you think Microsoft Visual Studio delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Microsoft Visual Studio's feature set?
Yes
Did Microsoft Visual Studio live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Microsoft Visual Studio go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Microsoft Visual Studio again?
Yes