Ticks all the boxes
Overall Satisfaction with Webexpenses
I use it for both expense payment and staff approval, plus reporting. As the Head of Procurement for the company I require the annual travel mileage (cars) and rail travel for the green house gas emission reports.
In terms of the problems it addresses, it simplifies and speeds up the entire expense process both for the payer and payee.
In terms of the problems it addresses, it simplifies and speeds up the entire expense process both for the payer and payee.
Pros
- Customized Reports
- Drag and drop receipts
- Applying category limits
Cons
- I've struggled to apply the rail CO2 feature
- Faster and easier payment and approval process
- Less laborious to complete (inputting expenses)
- Happier staff (due to simpler process)
- Easily applied expense policy (due to description/pop-ups when entering)
Since the last expense system was either a saved excel document and/or image of the expense document, Webexpenses has streamlined the entire process for both the person submitting their claim, their manager authorising it, and the accounts payable team paying. The fact we have itemised/category reports available is something we did not have previously.
It means the exercise of completing expenses is no longer a daunting task. Less time is spent completing their expenses so they can get on with their job. Also, expense patterns are more regular, where in the past employees would avoid completing expenses and do it in one painful go every 3-6months.
I have not witnessed this personally, but it makes sense. Having the policy noted as the entry is made is certainly a perfect reminder of policy, and prevents any complaints should expenses be rejected.
Do you think Webexpenses delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Webexpenses's feature set?
Yes
Did Webexpenses live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Webexpenses go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Webexpenses again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation