Acumatica vs. Unit4 Financials by Coda

It is an all-rounded system. What I do like about it the most is the fact that you can pick what you need for your business needs and enhancements. Then if your business needs change either removes or add modules to ensure constant improvement. The fact that Acumatica listens to its customers and implements new features based on what their users and customers came up with. The fact that the system is entirely cloud based makes it so much easier for your business to ensure constant trade and business as usual. You can customise Acumatica to your business needs and you have a partner that can bring their own and their client's ideas to the table to assist you to make sure you can implement and improve. Areas I think where it will be less appropriate is where your client or supplier are just not moving at the same speed as your business. This can bring delays or bottle-neck issues for both parties.

This would work well for the back side of accounting...meaning after the invoice was created. If you need software to create invoices, this may not be the software for you (or at least you would have to do additional research on its capability). Other than that, it takes care of the majority of our needs.

Incentivized

• We just went live about two weeks ago, so we are here at Acumatica Summit to see everything it's capable of. One of the things it is capable of is the dashboards and the integration with some of these third-party people to ensure we can get the data we need when we need it, so we're looking forward to getting all that live for us.

Incentivized

• It is easy to move around in if set up properly.
• You can changes background colors to your choice.
• It is customizable (you can create home pages specific to the user).

Incentivized

• There are a few spots where there is a list of data that we need a total for and we have to extract to Excel to get a total. It would be helpful to see a sum right in Acumatica.
• For the first time today I had an interesting glitch - my entire bank reconciliation unchecked the "reconciled" column and needed to be redone for the month. Funky little glitches happen from time to time
• Pivot tables don't seem to update as expected by using filters

Incentivized

• There is a lot of "building" when first starting up with the software.
• Some of the data you cannot pull unless you have sequel knowledge, although capabilities are getting better.
• There is not a good operating statement report option.

Incentivized

It is a flexible system that is very flexible and is easy to use. It will also be able to scale as the company grows. Frankly, we have invested too much time to walk away from it now and the initial phase is going well

Incentivized

Only reason is because when teaching our departments how to use, it takes them a long time and multiple requests about where things are located... as IT team, I can navigate easily, end users like accountants and shipping, it's a tiny bit cumbersome, but I believe ModernUI will resolve

Incentivized

It's always available.

there have been some performance issues

Incentivized

We recently switched VARs and it has made a world of difference! Our new VAR actually is proactive to various situations versus being reactive to events that have happened. They are accessing how we are using the modules and suggesting better more efficient ways!

Incentivized

Very helpful for end users

Incentivized

Online training has gone away. Need to bring back the webinars. Live webinars are so benficial to training new employees.

Incentivized

I'd say the partner selection is critically important. I think the software is very easy to implement. It's very customizable to your business. Finding a partner that will work with you to understand your business and your needs is the critical piece to make sure that the system goes along with it.

Incentivized

The basic difference between Acumatica and similar solutions is their complexity and usability. It is less complex and easier to learn, and it is also based on a low-code platform, which makes it more convenient for the end user.

Unit4 Financials is definitely much more robust than Peachtree or other software. I've also used SAP in the past and this seems to have many more capabilities.

Incentivized

No, annual invoices are fine. I do like that unlimited users are included.

From my understanding, the P.O. module is not very robust, at least the last time I inquired about it. At the time, it had a one-to-one match, with one invoice for one P.O. and that isn't practical for many businesses. I don't believe it would be an easy system to use for sending out invoices, if we had thousands of retail utility customers. We do a small number of invoices because we sell wholesale power, not retail, so we only Invoice the municipality. Not each utility customer.

They are very responsive and knowledgeable about the product. If the rep doesn't have the ability to solve the issue, they quickly get someone else involved to assist us.

• We were able to work in one system with customizations we needed in inventory and add all our grants in the same system
• Direct mail invoices was moved to an automated PO system saving time and allowing better financial tracking
• The grant module can be cumbersome requiring flip flopping to program partners etc during set up

Incentivized

• Because of the lack of operating statement reports, we've had to spend additional funds to use another system.
• It does show data in real time, so no waiting for batches to update overnight.
• You can do a lot of customizing to meet your own needs.

Incentivized