Adobe acquired Neolane in July 2013 and later re-named the product Adobe Campaign. Adobe Campaign provides both marketing automation and marketing resource management functionality such as spend & financial management, workflow, and asset management.
N/A
Resulticks
Score 6.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Resulticks is an omni-channel marketing automation platform
built by marketers for marketers. It is designed to provide a common platform
over which digital communications from a brand to its audiences can be managed,
tracked and measured. In addition to managing marketing campaigns across email,
mobile (in app, text), web, QR code, social media, sentiment monitoring,
Resulticks also provides added value for multi-market, multi-channel models.
We adore the fact that we can run numerous automated campaigns concurrently and that we can make changes to them without stopping and starting a new campaign. Adobe Campaign makes it possible for the process to go on.
Sender also offers multi-channel marketing capabilities, allowing users to engage with their audience through different channels. However, the range and depth of multi-channel capabilities in Adobe Campaign are generally more extensive. So after using both the platforms I …
In the end we didn’t go with Adobe Campaign. Although it offers great a great tool set that is very flexible. You do need someone on staff that know Adobe products to get the full utilisation out of it. Ultimately what it came down to for us was that because we had a small team, …
Adobe Campaign Standard has a lot of segmentation options out of the box and a lot better analytics. Pardot is a lot more listbased, where with Adobe Campaign, you can do complete customized segmentation, such as all permissions in base A who are currently customers of this …
Especially in its ease of use, especially considering its price and the great possibilities that this tool has given our company. Definitely a great competitor in this sector and the best option in terms of campaign creation, without any doubt, even having things that could be …
Adobe Campaign has all the features and tools that develop the whole marketing and sales channels. It has been able to integrate with our systems in all departments in development of our planning structure. While Salesforce CMS works effectively in the management of our …
Compared to other websites, Adobe Campaign stacks up with its various uses. You can create with its other platforms and follow through. Other platforms, you have to use adobe to create then go somewhere else to schedule and post. Adobe Campaign allows you to use all within one …
Adobe Campaign is good in terms of features, offerings, it's customization options, and extensive possibilities to make a powerful email campaign or offer landing page. It's very reliable and stable too. But in terms of its dashboard UI, it is not as simple or quick to learn as …
All these applications are very similar, adobe has a differential for the company's expertise, for the way cloud services and their specialists are treated. I believe that it also has a differential in the metrics and management of flows where it is possible to have a broader …
The platform is much more complex and much more suited for complicated applications. While Mailchimp is an easier all rounded solution for starters it doesn’t allow the system integrator to do customization of the workflows and more complicated tasks. I would say that in my …
Adobe Campaign is different from these products in that is much more all-encompassing and is able to manage more aspects of a campaign than these more singular-tracked platforms.
As we tried to centralise the marketing automation platform within the enterprise, Adobe Campaign can plug into several instances of Salesforce.com for lead management queues. All other marketing automation platforms can only plug into one instance of Salesforce.com.
For B2C campaign, [I] still prefer to go with Marketo. However, for all other transactional/Nontransactional, promotional, Welcome email campaigns, while it is required to handle [the] global market with [a] number of brands, [I would] [prefer to] go with Adobe Campaign …
Adobe Campaign has a lot more features as compared to Mailchimp. While Mailchimp allows you to send a lot of communication to a lot of recipients, Adobe Campaign lets you set variables in the workflow, and send email at different times with a lot more customization. Adobe …
Adobe is far ahead of what I used previously. Adobe has all the details of the customer which is required to increase the sales of the company and the customer also gets relevant information. Mailchimp is just an email tool where we can send mails to multiple users.
Resulticks
provides the breadth of digital channels to leverage with audiences. The
ability to use multiple channels with the same audience and tracking down to an
Resulticks provides a very intuitive and simple UI with powerful features to seamlessly integrate various data sources and off the shelf platforms. It also provides a big-data based, analytical model oriented insights.
Features
Adobe Campaign
Resulticks
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Resulticks
7.6
Ratings
0% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Dynamic content
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Landing pages
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
A/B testing
00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Resulticks
7.7
Ratings
1% below category average
Lead nurturing automation
00 Ratings
8.20 Ratings
Data quality management
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Resulticks
7.5
Ratings
2% above category average
Calendaring
00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Resulticks
7.5
Ratings
2% above category average
Social sharing and campaigns
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Social profile integration
00 Ratings
7.70 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Resulticks
7.0
Ratings
5% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
6.40 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Multi-Channel Campaign Management: I have found Adobe Campaign to be excellent for managing campaigns across multiple channels, including email, mobile, social media, and web. Its centralized platform allows me to plan, execute, and track campaigns effectively, making it ideal for organizations with diverse marketing channels. For example, when I was running a campaign to promote a new product launch across email, SMS, and social media channels, Adobe Campaign provided me with the tools to orchestrate and track the campaign seamlessly. I could ensure consistent messaging and a cohesive customer experience across different channels.
What we like most about this application is that it provides us with the creation of ads to generate presence and impact on different channels at minimum cost.
It has a section where [it] [helps] us determine our preferences in terms of marketing by private messaging and offer a report of actions.
It also provides analysis with percentages to determine how many customers actually received our e-mail advertising.
Despite the shortcomings of user interface and basic troubleshooting difficulty, Neolane is much more robust and delivers better capabilities to our sales and marketing staffs than any other product we have used here or any product our staff members have used at other locations.
Thanks to this tool we are taking more internal control of the creation and deployment of campaigns with less dependency on an ESP. We can pre-program marketing publications, being able to concentrate on the target audience. It helps me manage email campaigns with real-time tracking.
Although there is a lot of material available on the internet to answer questions, I still feel a lack of commitment and delay in the responses of the support, but as a whole, it leaves nothing to be desired. I believe that, in the great majority, companies sin in the desired support, but we cannot generalize. But this one, in particular, has a wide range of specialists and well-qualified management, but I believe that it is not so bad.
Sender also offers multi-channel marketing capabilities, allowing users to engage with their audience through different channels. However, the range and depth of multi-channel capabilities in Adobe Campaign are generally more extensive. So after using both the platforms I selected Adobe Campaign for my email marketing purpose.
Resulticks provides a very intuitive and simple UI with powerful features to seamlessly integrate various data sources and off the shelf platforms. It also provides a big-data based, analytical model oriented insights.
Adobe Campaign has boosted our ROI, with a 700% increase in the last month of using the service. These results are very favorable, and we will continue to use the service.
Adobe Campaign makes it easy to calculate the proposed ROI on a monthly basis, as it constantly lets us evaluate and compare the growth of our earnings in relation to previous ones.
Augmentation of target audience database. Eg. Building mobile data leveraging existing email IDs and vice versa, building social profiles leveraging consent-based apps
Improved lead generation and nurturing. Eg Customized content delivery, based on interest levels tracked