Airtime (formerly mmhmm) is an app that, when used as an add-on to a virtual camera, is designed to make video chats, meetings, and presentations more engaging.
$12
per month
VideoAsk by Typeform
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
VideoAsk, from Typeform, allows the user to get face-to-face with prospects, customers or audience through (asynchronous) video.
$30
per month 100 mins of video or audio processing per month
VWO
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
VWO is an A/B testing and conversion optimization platform that enables growing businesses to conduct qualitative and quantitative visitor research, build an experimentation roadmap and run continuous experiments on their digital properties. With its 5 capabilities Plan, Track, Test, Analyze, and Target, it brings the entire CRO (conversion rate optimization) process at one place. VWO helps online businesses follow the process- and data-driven conversion…
$49
per month
Pricing
Airtime
VideoAsk by Typeform
VWO
Editions & Modules
Individual
$12
per month
Team
$12
per month per user
Start
$0
per month 20 mins of video or audio processing per month
Grow
$30
per month 100 mins of video or audio processing per month
Brand
$50
per month 200 mins of video or audio processing per month
Subscription
$99.00
per month
TESTING
Get a Demo
The classic VWO A/B testing solution
CONVERSION OPTIMIZATION
Get a Demo
The all-in-one platform for all your optimization needs
ENTERPRISE
Get a Demo
Customized solution with advanced AB testing and conversion optimization capabilities
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Airtime
VideoAsk by Typeform
VWO
Free Trial
Yes
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discount available for annual pricing.
Discounts available for annual pricing.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Airtime
VideoAsk by Typeform
VWO
Features
Airtime
VideoAsk by Typeform
VWO
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Airtime
-
Ratings
VideoAsk by Typeform
-
Ratings
VWO
7.5
11 Ratings
11% below category average
a/b experiment testing
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Split URL testing
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Multivariate testing
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.011 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.41 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Test significance
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Advanced code editor
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Visitor recordings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.41 Ratings
Preview mode
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.41 Ratings
Test duration calculator
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.41 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Airtime
-
Ratings
VideoAsk by Typeform
-
Ratings
VWO
8.2
1 Ratings
7% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Website personalization
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
mmhmm is, by far, the absolute best presentation platform I have found - and I have looked a lot and demoed a lot of them. The flexibility, ease of use and visually engaging experience that mmhmm provides has, without fail, been a game changer tool no matter the presentation styles. While it is, hands down, the best virtual presentation platform, I have not been able to level up my in-person experiences to the same degree as I have online. I will continue to explore how and where I can integrate the mmhmm Studio toolsets to pump up my in-person experiences.
It works better for either small or big companies because small companies can start with the free plan which is very decent and has everything they need. Also for big companies who get the best paid plans they get a lot of premium functionalities, the insight module, outstanding reports. But for medium size companies who can only afford the basic paid plan, it may not be the best tool as it is very limited. For example, they cannot analize a/b tests for new and ruturning visitors, neither based on the users device category.
Easily integrates static slides, animations and video without having to have vast technical skills.
It's an intuitive application to use. In a few minutes you sign up, start a new presentation and you're underway. It's pretty plug-n-play.
I've recommended it to my "non-technical" friends and they love it. They told me it was super easy to use and has made them more excited to create and share their presentations.
VWO is pretty easy to implement on websites and doesn't require a heavy technology lift
The VWO interface is pretty intuitive and let's non-technical users make variants for testing
The VWO reporting dashboard is excellent for determining statistical significance and understanding whether differences in conversion rates are meaningful or not
In the future I might like to see a fast-swap handoff to fellow presenters like we do in a live presentation.
Getting more updates on the platform advances in emails would be helpful. Like the recent sharing of useful templates was awesome.
I'd like to see more user stories shared to see how others are using the platform to make their presentations stand out. These kinds of things are helpful in feeding my ideas and insights for my next meeting, presentation and lessons.
The user interface within VWO does take a bit of time to get used to, especially as it pertains to switching back and forth between tests. When running multiple experiments on a site at a time, a clear and succinct dashboard for everything in one place would be helpful (as opposed to needing to switch between A/B, multivariate, etc).
It's great value and we think we've ironed out all the major teething troubles. However, if we experience any more bugs or problems that significantly slow us down then we're seriously considering switching to Optimizely, which I haven't personally tested but have heard great things about from my CRO peers
I gave Visual Website Optimizer a rating of 8 because it is overall a great product to use. Setting up and keeping track of various tests is easy and straight forward. The only reason why this product is not rated higher is because the support documents online leave a lot of room for improvement.
VWO doesn't appear to slow down our website at all, though some customers with adblockers like UBlock Origin have been known to not see entire pages if VWO is making changes to the page at a macro level (background, font, etc). This is rare though.
While their online document support is lacking a simple email to their support team will almost always get responded to the next day. It has however taken more than one email to explain the problem to the support team till they understood the problem. The solution I was given also only half fixed the problem the rest I figured out on my own.
Training was good, just limited to the onboarding process. They walked through all of the steps it takes to get started in VWO and each of the modules, along with giving us ideas for starting our first test. I feel like it could be better if there was a guided process within the VWO program to continue to educate you along the way, and a way to turn that off for experienced users.
Overall, the implementation of VWO is straightforward. If you've got a straightforward way of deploying code to all of your test pages, either a good CMS or a TMS, then implementation should be a breeze. There is no tweaking to be done to the code itself, and once deployed it has the flexibility to cope with different VWO modules (tracking, conversion analysis, session analysis) without modification.
Of all the platforms out there - believe me, I've tried them all - or try to avoid them whenever I can - mmhmm stands on its own with its unique platform benefits, visualizations, ease of use, sharability, affordability, and overall "Wow" factor that we hope to get from our audiences. No matter what it is we are presenting. To have that ability to integrate and gravitate to our presentations has proven to be a game changer that really did not take a lot for us to do. Even better is the fact that we still may have to - for whatever reason - build a presentation in one of the slide builder apps we can still import them seamlessly into mmhmm and use the mmhmm interface as our camera when we use the other platforms. It's been a complete win, win, win all around.
There are significant differences in each platform when it comes to Optimizely and vwo. From a functionality and performance perspective they each have their pros and cons. It is important to go through the feature sets of each and ensure the solution you select will work specifically with your business objectives and conversion rate optimization goals
The product seems infinitely scalable for our needs (small business) and we've never had any issue with loading VWO-edited elements. I will say, though, that online customers with ad blockers have been known to not see certain VWO elements as their third-party scripts are disabled.
We've only seen positive impact since deciding to use mmhmm
The ROI is a bazillion-fold. It's not an expensing platform, but the positive impact has been priceless!
Even the Powerpoint burnt out team members have taken easily to using mmhmm
Our presentations get comments like, "Wow... this is cool." "We really loved this presentation. It was completely engaging." "What are you guys using? This is pretty dang cool!"