Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Mimecast Cloud Archive

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon S3 Glacier
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
The Amazon S3 Glacier storage classes are purpose-built for data archiving, providing a low cost archive storage in the cloud. According to AWS, S3 Glacier storage classes provide virtually unlimited scalability and are designed for 99.999999999% (11 nines) of data durability, and they provide fast access to archive data and low cost.
$0
Per GB Per Month
Mimecast Cloud Archive
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Mimecast Cloud Archive provides an archive storage solution for data retention, as well as search and retrieval of email, attachments and MS Teams conversations. The cloud archiving solution offers search capabilities for employees and automated tools for administrators that simplify management of mailboxes, e-discovery and litigation support.N/A
Pricing
Amazon S3 GlacierMimecast Cloud Archive
Editions & Modules
Bulk Retrieval Pricing
$0.0025
Per GB Per Month
Storage Pricing
$0.004
Per GB Per Month
Retrieval Pricing
$0.01
Per GB Per Month
Expedited Retrieval Pricing
$0.03
Per GB Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon S3 GlacierMimecast Cloud Archive
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon S3 GlacierMimecast Cloud Archive
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Amazon S3 GlacierMimecast Cloud Archive
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.5 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.5 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.5 out of 10
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon S3 GlacierMimecast Cloud Archive
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(8 ratings)
9.4
(18 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(1 ratings)
8.4
(8 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(8 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(8 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon S3 GlacierMimecast Cloud Archive
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
If your organization has a lot of archival data that it needs to be backed up for safekeeping, where it won't be touched except in a dire emergency, Amazon Glacier is perfect. In our case, we had a client that generates many TB of video and photo data at annual events and wanted to retain ALL of it, pre- and post- edit for potential use in a future museum. Using the Snowball device, we were able to move hundreds of TB of existing media data that was previously housed on multiple Thunderbolt drives, external RAIDs, etc, in an organized manner, to Amazon Glacier. Then, we were able to setup CloudBerry Backup on their production computers to continually backup any new media that they generated during their annual events.
Read full review
Mimecast
This is for any business that needs secure, tamper-resistant, long-term email storage. Mimecast cloud archive is the answer. Easy self-service user interface, Admin interface is generally pretty usable as well with a good level of granular permissions for delegation to support staff. It allows cost savings with email storage by implementing retention policies and offloading the storage to Mimecast.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Cheap storage of backup data.
  • Can be used as a part of the entire suite of tools from Amazon, without requiring you to leave the familiar stack.
Read full review
Mimecast
  • Sync and Recover is a great tool for when you need to recover emails quickly or in bulk.
  • The archive is nested in the mail protection admin portal, so it is easy to navigate between the recent mail in the protection portal (limited window of time) and the archive when searching for emails during investigations or troubleshooting.
  • The additional protection feature allows scanning of emails that land in the archive. This helps with internal to internal emails that might have been malicious, for instance from a compromised account.
  • The Mimecast for Outlook add-in is nice, although you can access it from the web as well, for seeing your own archives. If users are missing an email, they can look there on their own without submitting an IT support ticket.
  • We do not allow end users to restore their own, but that is a feature that exists as well.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Sometime due to slow drives there are operation failure noticed by us in testing
  • Cost of restoring data is high and if you have regular restoring them it is not good option and slow as well.
  • While we were setting up the system we took some support from AWS and in many cases their answers were not up to the mark.
Read full review
Mimecast
  • The system runs slowly at times.
  • There are so many features, it can be difficult to find exactly how to perform some actions.
  • Emails are not automatically shown in their native format when searched you must click on the email and then request it be formatted in the proper format (HTML, plaintext, etc.).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Mimecast
The system does what we require of it and the support is good. No need to replace it at the moment.
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
It is difficult to delete the data as you have to wait for inventory and then bucket modification has to expire.
Read full review
Mimecast
The tool is very easy to use, it has both a web portal and a built in outlook add-in, both with simple to use functions. My personal favorite is the keyword search, being able to recall specific parts of an email but not quite the subject or sender; searching keywords is a super helpful tool. Alongside that, being able to filter dates, times is also very powerful and something that traditional email clients don’t really cover.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Mimecast
100% Mimecast Cloud Archive we love the tool we know we can count on an email being in Mimecast when its been deleted from exchange we've never had an issue of availability with Mimecast always 100% never lost an email yet! Mimecast is an amazing tool for the money! Totally recommend to other collogues in the field.
Read full review
Performance
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Mimecast
Microsoft Outlook add-in could do with a few minor improvements, but searches are very fast. The only problem is that when you search the archive, it will only display 25 messages per screen. Then, as you scroll, it takes a little time to load the next 25 items. This can be a little slow when trying to search many results.
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Mimecast
It does a good job. The support team of the product was good and responsive and was also able to fix the issues I was experiencing at the time. It isn't perfect and takes some time to set up properly in the environment but once set up the product does what it is supposed to do which is what you are paying for.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
Since the rest of our infrastructure is in Amazon AWS, coding for sending data to Glacier just makes sense. The others are great as well, for their specific needs and uses, but having *another* third-party software to manage, be billed for, and learn/utilize can be costly in money and time.
Read full review
Mimecast
One of the big features of Mimecast is the ability to send large files. We used to use CItrix Sharefile for this but switched over to Mimecast's LFS for one large reason...since we are archiving all of our mail in Mimeast anyway we would have wanted these attachments, even if large, also available to if we go back to look at old emails. However just for usability sake I think Citrix Sharefile's large file send is more polished and probably works a little better. We just choose to use the Mimecast so we had a one stop shop when it came to email archiving
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • We seldom need to access our data in Glacier; this means that it is a fraction of the cost of S3, including the infrequent-access storage class.
  • Transitioning data to Glacier is managed by AWS. We don't need our engineers to build or maintain log pipelines.
  • Configuring lifecycle policies for S3 and Glacier is simple; it takes our engineers very little time, and there is little risk of errant configuration.
Read full review
Mimecast
  • I can't put an exact dollar figure on it but Mimecast makes our company more efficient when it comes to email search and discovery.
  • Being heavily regulated it's great to have peace of mind when we're audited and I can just say we have Mimecast. Check that box off!
  • We were quite relieved when Mimecast stopped inbound attachments infected with WannaCry.
  • I enjoy the benefits of a cloud service so I don't have to manage hardware, deal with upgrades, or figure out complicated licensing schemes.
Read full review
ScreenShots