TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Anaconda

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AAnaconda is an enterprise Python platform that provides access to open-source Python and R packages used in AI, data science, and machine learning. These enterprise-grade solutions are used by corporate, research, and academic institutions for competitive advantage and research.

    $0

    per month

    IBM Cognos Analytics

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/AIBM Cognos is a full-featured business intelligence suite by IBM, designed for larger deployments. It comprises Query Studio, Reporting Studio, Analysis Studio and Event Studio, and Cognos Administration along with tools for Microsoft Office integration, full-text search, and dashboards.

    $11.25

    per month per user

    PyCharm

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/APyCharm is an extensive Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for Python developers. Its arsenal includes intelligent code completion, error detection, and rapid problem-solving features, all of which aim to bolster efficiency. The product supports programmers in composing orderly and maintainable code by offering PEP8 checks, testing assistance, intelligent refactorings, and inspections. Moreover, it caters to web development frameworks like Django and Flask by providing framework…

    $9.90

    per month per user

    Pricing
    AnacondaIBM Cognos AnalyticsPyCharm
    Editions & Modules
    Free Tier
    $0
    per month
    Starter Tier
    $15
    per month per user
    Business
    $50
    per month per user
    Custom
    Contact Sales
    On Demand - Standard
    USD 11.25
    per month per user
    On Demand - Premium
    USD 44.90
    per month per user
    For Individuals
    $99
    per year per user
    All Products Pack for Organizations
    $249
    per year per user
    All Products Pack for Individuals
    $289
    per year per user
    For Organizations
    $779
    per year per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AnacondaIBM Cognos AnalyticsPyCharm
    Free Trial
    NoYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AnacondaIBM Cognos AnalyticsPyCharm
    Considered Multiple Products
    Anaconda
    Chose Anaconda
    It is almost dishonest to compare Anaconda with PyCharm as they do different things in their basic forms unless you spend a lot of time configuring plugins on your PyCharm environment. Anaconda has a lot of things ready and you just need to install your libs and dependencies.
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    Some analyzed tools, such as PyCharm and Spyder, are simpler to use but still do not have all the libraries needed for those starting out in data science--or in institutions that need to grow in that direction. Anaconda is more robust but stable, more complete, and the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    I know that PyCharm is a IDE and Anaconda is a distribution. However I use Anaconda largely due to Jupyter Notebook, which more or less does the same job as PyCharm. 1 year ago I decided to use Anaconda (Jupiyer Notebook) as it is easier to use it as a beginner(at least my …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    Anaconda is very strong in the environment and version control that make data science work much easier. The only thing that might be comparable to Anaconda would be using Kubernetes to control Docker. Another potential improvement would be replacing spyder with PyCharm and Atom …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    Anaconda is way easier to set-up. On Anaconda we have users working on Machine Learning in minutes, where on PyCharm is takes a lot longer to set-up and often involves getting help from IT. PyCharm is easier to integrate with Code repositories (such as GitHub), so if that's …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    There are several reasons why Anaconda is better to use for me including that it is much easier to use than Baycharm. Also, the user interface is not as complicated as that of Baycharm. Even Anaconda does not slow down my device, using PaySharm slowed down my device in an …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    In Anaconda, [it is easy] to find and install the required libraries. Here, we can work on multiple projects with different sets of the environment. [It is] easy to create the notebook for developing the ML model and deployment. Right now, it is the best data science version …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    Free ware, better design ease of use
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    On top of all the software that I have used, Anaconda is the best because in Anaconda we have built-in packages that provide no headache to install packages and we can design a separate environment for different projects. Anaconda has versions made for special use cases. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    Compare Anaconda to Unix coding system. You can use PIP to install and create requirement.txt to replace environment.yml to avoid using Anaconda. However, Anaconda is such an excellent tool to maintain your environment and check the version of your package and update the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    I like SpyDER, which comes with Anaconda better for its intuitive layout and variable explorer options.
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    Anaconda is the best Python environment because you have all the things you need all in one places, at the reach of your hand. You can download and manage libraries as you wish and is very easy to create new projects and API's for all your stuff.

    It's Multiplatform so you don't …
    Incentivized
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    JetBrains
    Chose PyCharm
    PyCharm is the best tool to switch between different projects. One can connect to various technologies at a time. Package and plugin installation is easy. Dark and light mode helps in working according to the mood. One can extend it to IntelliJ, depending on the need for custom …
    Incentivized
    Chose PyCharm
    PyCharm was selected due to it's first class treatment of Python. Visual Studio is more general "Do everything" IDE which contains a lot of features our team didn't need. PyCharm strikes the balance of power and complexity.
    Incentivized
    Chose PyCharm
    What differentiates PyCharm from other products is that it is built for a particular language (Python) and works great while doing it, without losing efficiency with the rest of languages. It's simple, easy to use, fast and efficient, what else could you need?
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    96%
    Would buy again
    24 Answers
    97%
    Would buy again
    92 Answers
    96%
    Would buy again
    23 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    23 Answers
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    79 Answers
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    25 Answers
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    91 Answers
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    23 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    93%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    55 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    16 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    21 Answers
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    64 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    23 Answers
    Features
    AnacondaIBM Cognos AnalyticsPyCharm
    Platform Connectivity
    Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Anaconda and IBM Cognos Analytics and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    9.3
    25 Ratings
    11% above category average
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Connect to Multiple Data Sources9.822 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Extend Existing Data Sources8.024 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic Data Format Detection9.721 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    MDM Integration9.614 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Exploration
    Comparison of Data Exploration features of Anaconda and IBM Cognos Analytics and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    8.5
    25 Ratings
    1% above category average
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Visualization9.025 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Interactive Data Analysis8.024 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of Anaconda and IBM Cognos Analytics and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    9.0
    26 Ratings
    10% above category average
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment8.823 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Transformations8.026 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Encryption9.719 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Built-in Processors9.620 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Data Modeling
    Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Anaconda and IBM Cognos Analytics and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    9.2
    24 Ratings
    8% above category average
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools9.023 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Machine Learning8.921 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Single platform for multiple model development10.024 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-Service Model Delivery9.019 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Model Deployment
    Comparison of Model Deployment features of Anaconda and IBM Cognos Analytics and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    9.5
    21 Ratings
    11% above category average
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    -
    Ratings
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Flexible Model Publishing Options10.021 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, Governance, and Cost Controls9.020 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Anaconda and IBM Cognos Analytics and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.7
    138 Ratings
    6% below category average
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings7.6129 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards00 Ratings8.0136 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings7.5131 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Anaconda and IBM Cognos Analytics and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.9
    138 Ratings
    1% below category average
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Drill-down analysis00 Ratings7.4136 Ratings00 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.3139 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.397 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.6133 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Anaconda and IBM Cognos Analytics and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    9.2
    136 Ratings
    11% above category average
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Publish to Web00 Ratings9.836 Ratings00 Ratings
    Publish to PDF00 Ratings8.2132 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Versioning00 Ratings9.833 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.2134 Ratings00 Ratings
    Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings9.918 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Anaconda and IBM Cognos Analytics and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.4
    124 Ratings
    8% below category average
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings7.9121 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.0114 Ratings00 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics00 Ratings6.7110 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings6.947 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Anaconda and IBM Cognos Analytics and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    7.8
    130 Ratings
    8% below category average
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings7.5129 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings7.5127 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings7.4127 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.257 Ratings00 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.6111 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Anaconda and IBM Cognos Analytics and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    6.4
    109 Ratings
    19% below category average
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings6.8104 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Application00 Ratings6.390 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings6.696 Ratings00 Ratings
    Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
    Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Anaconda and IBM Cognos Analytics and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    -
    Ratings
    IBM Cognos Analytics
    9.2
    87 Ratings
    17% above category average
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    REST API00 Ratings7.683 Ratings00 Ratings
    Javascript API00 Ratings7.779 Ratings00 Ratings
    iFrames00 Ratings9.912 Ratings00 Ratings
    Java API00 Ratings10.013 Ratings00 Ratings
    Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings9.915 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings9.99 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AnacondaIBM Cognos AnalyticsPyCharm
    Small Businesses
    RapidMiner
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Cyfe
    Score4 out of 10
    Visual Studio
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Jupyter Notebook
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Qlik Cloud Analytics (Qlik Sense)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    IntelliJ IDEA
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Watson Studio
    Score10 out of 10
    Sisense
    Score6.9 out of 10
    WebStorm
    Score9.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AnacondaIBM Cognos AnalyticsPyCharm
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (38 ratings)
    8.0
    (158 ratings)
    9.6
    (42 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.4
    (31 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    7.3
    (10 ratings)
    9.6
    (4 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.9
    (9 ratings)
    1.0
    (9 ratings)
    8.3
    (13 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (40 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sources
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.3
    (40 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.3
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AnacondaIBM Cognos AnalyticsPyCharm
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Anaconda
    I have asked all my juniors to work with Anaconda and Pycharm only, as this is the best combination for now. Coming to use cases: 1. When you have multiple applications using multiple Python variants, it is a really good tool instead of Venv (I never like it). 2. If you have to work on multiple tools and you are someone who needs to work on data analytics, development, and machine learning, this is good. 3. If you have to work with both R and Python, then also this is a good tool, and it provides support for both.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    For Transaction monitoring, we build reports for executive management, providing insights into the number of alerts, the types or categories of detection scenarios, the risk profile, and a snapshot of high- or urgent-priority cases to be reported to AUSTRAC. Congos helps to build the report by ingesting alert data exported from SAS datasets. It joins with other data from Teradata and Customer Hub (Oracle).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    PyCharm is well suited to developing and deploying Python applications in the cloud using Kubernetes or serverless pipelines. The integration with GitLab is great; merges and rebates are easily done and help the developer move quickly. The search engine that allows you to search inside your code is also great. It is less appropriate for other languages.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Anaconda
    • Anaconda is a one-stop destination for important data science and programming tools such as Jupyter, Spider, R etc.
    • Anaconda command prompt gave flexibility to use and install multiple libraries in Python easily.
    • Jupyter Notebook, a famous Anaconda product is still one of the best and easy to use product for students like me out there who want to practice coding without spending too much money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Enterprise reporting - Create, customise, and run reports on sales trends, consumer sentiment, etc.
    • Dashboard creation and data exploration & analysis - Using drag and drop feature to create ad-hoc visualisation. Additionally, using AI powered natural language query feature for data analysis and dashboard input (formation of pie, bar, line charts). It's useful for no-technical person to put queries around the spreadsheet data to get quick answers.
    • Building insights for accurate decision making - Package reports with data backed insights for stakeholders in pdf, and Excel format to support business ad-hoc cases, forecasting and strategic recommendations on relevant asks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    • Git integration is really essential as it allows anyone to visually see the local and remote changes, compare revisions without the need for complex commands.
    • Complex debugging tools are basked into the IDE. Controls like break on exception are sometimes very helpful to identify errors quickly.
    • Multiple runtimes - Python, Flask, Django, Docker are native the to IDE. This makes development and debugging and even more seamless.
    • Integrates with Jupyter and Markdown files as well. Side by side rendering and editing makes it simple to develop such files.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Anaconda
    • It can have a cloud interface to store the work.
    • Compatible for large size files.
    • I used R Studio for building Machine Learning models, Many times when I tried to run the entire code together the software would crash. It would lead to loss of data and changes I made.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • IBM Cognos Analytics enables customer data segmentation, which is essential for marketing, improving and streamlining purchasing behavior and preferences. This helps companies create more targeted and effective marketing campaigns.
    • Our clients Through data analysis, we can identify and observe trends in the behavior of other clients, allowing us to anticipate needs and adjust strategies to avoid consequences.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    • The biggest complaint I have about PyCharm is that it can use a lot of RAM which slows down the computer / IDE. I use the paid version, and have otherwise found nothing to complain about the interface, utility, and capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Anaconda
    It's really good at data processing, but needs to grow more in publishing in a way that a non-programmer can interact with. It also introduces confusion for programmers that are familiar with normal Python processes which are slightly different in Anaconda such as virtualenvs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    For an existing solution, renewing licenses does provide a good return on investment. Additionally, while rolling out scorecards and dashboards with little adhoc capabilities, to end users, cognos is very easily scalable. It also allows to create a solution that has a mix of OLAP and relational data-sources, which is a limitation with other tools. Synchronizing with existing security setup is easy too.
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    It's perfect for our needs, cuts development time, is really helpful for newbies to understand projects structure
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Anaconda
    I am giving this rating because I have been using this tool since 2017, and I was in college at that time. Initially, I hesitated to use it as I was not very aware of the workings of Python and how difficult it is to manage its dependency from project to project. Anaconda really helped me with that. The first machine-learning model that I deployed on the Live server was with Anaconda only. It was so managed that I only installed libraries from the requirement.txt file, and it started working. There was no need to manually install cuda or tensor flow as it was a very difficult job at that time. Graphical data modeling also provides tools for it, and they can be easily saved to the system and used anywhere.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    We have a strong user base (3500 users) that are highly utilizing this tool. Basic users are able to consume content within the applied security model. We have a set of advanced users that really push the limits of Cognos with Report and Query Studio. These users have created a lot of personal content and stored it in 'My Reports'. Users enjoy this flexibility.
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    It's pretty easy to use, but if it's your first time using it, you need time to adapt. Nevertheless, it has a lot of options, and everything is pretty easy to find. The console has a lot of advantages and lets you accelerate your development from the first day.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Anaconda
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Reports can typically be viewed through any browser that can access the server, so the availability is ultimately up to what the company utilizing it is comfortable with allowing, though report development tends to be more picky about browsers and settings as mentioned above. It also has an optional iPad app and general mobile browsing support, but dashboards lack the mobile compatibility. What keeps it from getting a higher score is the desktop tools that are vital to the development process. The compatibility with only Windows when the server has a wide range of compatibility can be a real sore point for a company that outfits its employees exclusively with Mac or Linux machines. Of course, if they are planning on outsourcing the development anyways, it's a rather moot point
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Anaconda
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Overall no major complaints but it doesn't handle DMR (Dimensionally Modeled for Relational) very well. DMR modelling is a capability that IBM Cognos Framework Manager provides allowing you to specify dimensional information for relational metadata and allows for OLAP-style queries. However, the capability is not very efficient and, for example, if I'm using only 2 columns on a 20-column model, the software is not smart enough to exclude 18 columns and the query side gets progressively larger and larger until it's effectively unusable.
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Anaconda
    Anaconda provides fast support, and a large number of users moderate its online community. This enables any questions you may have to be answered in a timely fashion, regardless of the topic. The fact that it is based in a Python environment only adds to the size of the online community.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Why is their web application not working as fast as you think it should? They never know, and it is always a a bunch of shots in the dark to find out. Trying to download software from them is like trying to find a book at the library before computers were invented.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    I rate 10/10 because I have never needed a direct customer support from the JetBrains so far. Whenever and for whatever kind of problems I came across, I have been able to resolve it within the internet community, simply by Googling because turns out most of the time, it was me who lacked the proper information to use the IDE or simply make the proper configuration. I have never came across a bug in PyCharm either so it deserves 10/10 for overall support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Anaconda
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Onsite training provided by IBM Cognos was effective and as expected. They did not perform training with our data which was a bit difficult for our end-users.
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Anaconda
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The online courses they offer are thorough and presented in such a way that someone who isn't already familiar with the general design methodologies used in this field will be capable of making a good design. The training environments are provided as a fully self contained virtual machine with everything needed already to create the environments. We've had some persisting issues with the environments becoming unavailable, but support has been responsive when these issues arise and straightening them out for us
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Anaconda
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Make sure that any custom tables that you have, are built into your metadata packages. You can still access them via SQL queries in Cognos, but it is much easier to have them as a part of the available metadata packages.
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Anaconda
    I have experience using RStudio oustide of Anaconda. RStudio can be installed via anaconda, but I like to use RStudio separate from Anaconda when I am worin in R. I tend to use Anaconda for python and RStudio for working in R. Although installing libraries and packages can sometimes be tricky with both RStudio and Anaconda, I like installing R packages via RStudio. However, for anything python-related, Anaconda is my go to!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Power BI is stronger for quick ad-hoc analysis and dashboards, but IBM Cognos Analytics is better when consistency, precision, and mass distribution matter. Tableau is best for interactive analysis, while IBM Cognos Analytics is better for standardized, repeatable enterprise reporting. Sigma shines for customizable dashboards and drill-down analysis while IBM Cognos Analytics holds an edge in data discovery and visualization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    When it comes to development and debugging PyCharm is better than Spyder as it provides good debugging support and top-quality code completion suggestions. Compared to Jupiter notebook it's easy to install required packages in PyCharm, also PyChram is a good option when we want to write production-grade code because it provides required suggestions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Anaconda
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    We rate IBM Cognos Analytics a 9 out of 10 for overall scalability. The platform handles large numbers of users, reports, and analytical workloads very reliably. We have experienced strong performance even in demanding enterprise environments with substantial data volumes. Its architecture provides sufficient flexibility to scale resources according to demand, making it well suited for large, business-critical deployments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Anaconda
    • It has helped our organization to work collectively faster by using Anaconda's collaborative capabilities and adding other collaboration tools over.
    • By having an easy access and immediate use of libraries, developing times has decreased more than 20 %
    • There's an enormous data scientist shortage. Since Anaconda is very easy to use, we have to be able to convert several professionals into the data scientist. This is especially true for an economist, and this my case. I convert myself to Data Scientist thanks to my econometrics knowledge applied with Anaconda.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • The platform can be pretty pricey.
    • Convoluted contracts and they fine you for any breach during audits.
    • Things are changed between releases without any warning and break.
    • It is second to none at being able to customize list and crosstab type reports.
    • You can easily set up a report to be emailed out every day and even have it export the report to a shared folder.
    • On-prem environments can be scaled up pretty much as much as you would like.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    • PyCharm has a very positive ROI for our BU. It has increased developer productivity exponentially.
    • Software quality has significantly improved. We are able to refactor/test/debug the code quicker/faster/better.
    • Our business unit is able to deliver faster. Customers are happier than ever.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM Cognos Analytics Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot