Apache Tomcat vs. Cloudflare

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Tomcat
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Tomcat is an open-source web server supported by Apache.N/A
Cloudflare
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Cloudflare, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, provides DDoS and bot mitigation security for business domains, as well as a content delivery network (CDN) and web application firewall (WAF).
$20
per month
Pricing
Apache TomcatCloudflare
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Pro
$20
per month
Business
$200
per month
Free
Free
Enterprise
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache TomcatCloudflare
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache TomcatCloudflare
Considered Both Products
Apache Tomcat
Chose Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat is a much wider open standard than Microsoft IIS. It also seems to use fewer resources and is simpler to maintain. Troubleshooting when an issue arises is difficult. We had trouble managing the Tail logs when something strange happened. Logging is very complex and …
Cloudflare

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Apache TomcatCloudflare
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Apache Tomcat
7.5
22 Ratings
8% below category average
Cloudflare
-
Ratings
IDE support6.521 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management6.722 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management6.222 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance8.122 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation9.622 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance8.122 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache TomcatCloudflare
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
BIG-IP
BIG-IP
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
BIG-IP
BIG-IP
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache TomcatCloudflare
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(22 ratings)
9.1
(128 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.2
(4 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(3 ratings)
8.6
(6 ratings)
Availability
6.0
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(4 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(5 ratings)
8.6
(106 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(2 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache TomcatCloudflare
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Excellent value for companies wishing to host Java applications in the cloud. Utilizing hosting tools such as load balancers and network and application firewalls, Tomcat can be part of a powerful system to host web applications to thousands of users. There has been consistency in the development and support of Tomcat since its initial release in the late '90s and the best commonalities have been carried forward. If you host Java web applications, Tomcat is as good as any for an application server.
Read full review
Cloudflare
Cloudflare is well suited for: 1) High-traffic websites: Cloudflare's CDN reduces the latency and improving website speed by delivering content quickly to visitors from a geographically distributed network of servers close to them. 2) Websites prone to DDoS attacks: Cloudflare's IP Firewall, rate limiting, and other security features help prevent DDoS attacks and other malicious traffic from reaching the website. 3) E-commerce websites: Cloudflare's SSL/TLS encryption and web application firewall provide added security for online transactions, protecting sensitive data and ensuring customer trust. 4) Websites using WordPress: Cloudflare's WordPress-specific page caching solution helps improve website performance by reducing load times and increasing cache hit ratios. There are also scenarios where Cloudflare may be less appropriate, including: 1) Websites that need full control over their DNS and security configurations. With some features you get limited control in Cloudflare. 2) You may not get the exact level of customization or control.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Fast to start up, which is useful when we need to just check that our changes are working correctly.
  • Free, which allows us to not be involved with the finance/legal team about using it.
  • Bundled with Spring Boot, which makes it even more convenient for our testing.
Read full review
Cloudflare
  • DNS is easily managed, the UI is easy to use and learn
  • the firewall rules are easy to test and configure and are quick and effective
  • The "we are under attack" feature has saved our sites from DDoS attempts with only one click
  • Their Cache is easy to set and use and integrates easily with other systems
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • Using tomcat manager to troubleshoot is not very informative. Error messages are vague, you have to dig into log files for more information about the problems.
  • Is great for simple web applications, but may not work for heavy development which may require a full J2EE stack, might like JBoss better.
  • Security in tomcat is not straightforward, as I discovered that you have to understand how to set up realms in tomcat in order to hash passwords, which I was not overly familiar with, which is a big deal when setting up users in the tomcat-users.xml file.
Read full review
Cloudflare
  • Some features require a bit of hand holding to deploy correctly. While the documentation is good, it could provide more examples to cover additional use cases.
  • Telephone support for enterprise customers is for emergencies only, but sometimes phone conversations are better for providing clarity.
  • Enterprise lite customers can't purchase all options available to total enterprise customers. Still, many of those additional features cost additional, so upgrading to the full enterprise means an increase in base plus the additional feature (bot management is a great example). Enterprise lite customers should be able to add these services on as well but without an increase in base.
  • It's difficult to add new services to enterprise plans. It would be ideal if customers could purchase/upgrade online and sign an order insertion digitally from the site instead of having to go through customer success.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apache
We have a huge knowledge of the product within our company and we're satisfied with the performance.
Read full review
Cloudflare
Cloudflare features are an integral part of my website, as of now I can’t think about doing without it. It would require an unimaginable time and effort to find and implement alternatives for every feature, considered how large and diverse Cloudflare feature set is
Read full review
Usability
Apache
Tomcat has a very rich API set which allows us to implement our automation script to trigger the deployment, configure, stop and start Tomcat from the command line. In our projects, we embedded Tomcat in our Eclipse in all of the developer's machines so they could quickly verify their code with little effort, Azure Webapp has strong support for Tomcat so we could move our application to Azure cloud very easy. One drawback is Tomcat UI quite poorly features but we almost do not use it.
Read full review
Cloudflare
Everything is extremely concise and all settings apply immediately and take effect globally. There is no reason to explicitly plan/think in terms of individual regions as one would have to traditional cloud offerings (AWS, OCI, Azure). All Cloudflare products integrate seamless as part of a single pipeline that executes from request to response.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Apache
Tomcat doesn't have a built-in watchdog that ensures restart upon failure, so you have to provide it externally. A very good solution is java service wrapper. The community edition is able to restart Tomcat upon out of memories exceptions.
Read full review
Cloudflare
No answers on this topic
Performance
Apache
Tomcat support to customize memory used and allow us to define the Connection pool and thread pool to increase system performance and availability, Tomcat server itself consume very little memory and almost no footprint. We use Tomcat in our production environment which has up to thousands of concurrent users and it is stable and provides a quick response.
Read full review
Cloudflare
Their Argo for the global network is the core feature we love.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
Well, in actuality, I have never needed support for Apache Tomcat since it is configured and ready-to-go with no configuration needed on my end.
Read full review
Cloudflare
In a nutshell, Cloudflare is a renowned content delivery network (CDN) that provides dependable services that can assist in making your website perform more smoothly. They have a wide variety of possibilities, so there is a good chance that one of them will suit your needs. I enjoy the responsive service I get
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
Cloudflare
Very well executed implementation where our team was able to handle the implementation with guidance.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
Eclipse Jetty is the best alternative for Apache Tomcat because which is also an open-source and lightweight servlet container like Tomcat. A major advantage of this over Tomcat is that Jetty server can easily be embedded with the source code of web applications. Since it requires less memory to operate, you may realize that it is very efficient.
Read full review
Cloudflare
Cloudflare is the best option for my business for my use cases aligns exactly with what Cloudflare provides. Fastly only offers 1 month of free trial while AWS Route 53 is heavily integrated with AWS cloud. I want the flexibility to launch my own VPS and have a CDN, DDoS protection for my websites. Cloudflare provides just that, all for free.
Read full review
Scalability
Apache
It's very easy to add instances to an existing deployment and, using apache with mod proxy balancer, to scale up the serving farm
Read full review
Cloudflare
So far it has been very reliable
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Tomcat is cheap and very quick to deploy, so it has benefited much when situation needs applications to be deployed quickly without wasting time on licensing and installations.
  • Plenty of documentation available so no vendor training is required. Support contract is not needed as well.
Read full review
Cloudflare
  • Cloudflare's free plan has no hard limits on traffic it can handle.
  • We have had up to 41GB of traffic per day handled very efficiently.
  • Cloudflare's R2 ensures you can move your data anywhere without any egress fees.
  • Cloudflare has handled maximum of 2.4Million requests in a day for us.
  • Cloudflare email routing handles about 10000 email/day requirements for us for free.
Read full review
ScreenShots