ApplicantPro vs. JobAdder

ApplicantPro is well suited in a environment where an employer isn't hiring a ton of people - this is because ApplicantPro is built with some automation, but you do have to pay attention to each individual candidate. ApplicantPro would be less well suited for a company looking to hire a lot of people or a company where they want to post a ton of different jobs

Incentivized

I've already answered this question. JobAdder is easy to use, easy to configure, has great support, has a strong product roadmap, good partner integrations...really a top-notch platform.

Incentivized

• Notifies me when someone has applied for a position.
• Send follow-up emails to applicants.
• Relatively easy to set up a job posting.

Incentivized

• Flexible workflows
• Intuitive design
• Wealth of third-party integrations
• Easy-to-access support and knowledge hub
• Good onboarding process

Incentivized

• Recently it has been a bit harder to push jobs to my Favorite job boards.
• Can be hard to reach a CSR for help.

Incentivized

• Hard to get in touch with technical support
• Has a price to it
• Hard to clear alerts

Incentivized

It is a solid product that is easy to use and implement.

Incentivized

We tried using BambooHR's built in job applications. It didn't post to near as many job sites and that is why we switched.

Incentivized

Many of the products we have evaluated are not available on the list. We've looked at Mindscope Cura, we've used Mindscope (before Cura), we were long-time users of Sendouts (before Bullhorn acquisition), and we were on a product called Compas for a few years before moving to JobAdder. JobAdder excels in product features/capabilities, ease of use, and incredible support. We have been very pleased with our selection!

Incentivized

• ApplicantPro has given us a cost-efficient way of getting our jobs out to several free job sites and does a great job of integrating with Indeed.
• We typically get a great flow of candidates when we post with ApplicantPro.

Incentivized

• Improved time-to-hire drastically by isolating the process to one system
• Improved hiring manager involvement in process
• Improved allocation of tasks amongst recruitment team
• Improved reporting on recruitment activities which helped to monitor team workload

Incentivized