Asana vs TeamGantt

• Multiple users can access the program at once without stepping on each other's toes or having to wait until someone is out a project to add something. It is definitely a group friendly program.
• We like how visually pleasing it is. It is not at all intimidating to first-time users as it is very user-friendly. You can quickly find what you need and become comfortable with its features and functions.
• I personally like being able to assign different tasks to different employees and be able to receive feedback and progress directly from that assigned person as well as view it myself.

Read full review

• Good looking Gantt charts help make it easy to know what's going on.
• Organizes priorities. People have no question of what they should be working on and also have clarity around what others are doing.
• Shows the effects of what happens when things are running late visually and typically allows us to make up the slack faster.

Read full review

• Little complex UX for beginners
• Site is a little heavy to load

Read full review

• No integration. We wish it could integrate with our project management system to make things faster.
• Hard to add multiple dependencies.
• Could have better views/reporting.

Read full review

• ROI is through the roof. No WAY could we have accomplished the record-breaking production year we have had without Asana. And at just a few hundred a month it's a total bargain. While I will probably always remain on the lookout for something that does what Asana does but also features detailed reporting, I can't complain too much. Asana delivered what I needed it to: much faster completion of individual tasks leading to exponentially increased output across the team (and therefore higher potential sales volume). Fewer hours wasted on work "meta" like sending e-mails back & forth, tracking progress on spreadsheets and so forth means less $$$ spent on wages to achieve greater results. That, in turn, allows for better hourly wages for team members and a much happier team overall.
• The negative impact of Asana is that our development team is often tied up supporting our essential integrations when they could be building new things instead. Asana is great, but it isn't a total solution and doesn't pretend to be. The cost of making up the difference for a larger, more complex operation like ours is substantial, but it is still more cost-effective than trying to develop a proprietary solution that probably would not be as polished anyway.

Read full review

• It helps us stick much closer to our deadlines than we would without it
• We are more efficient with it
• Much better team awareness and engagement

Read full review