athenaClinicals vs. Tebra Billing & Payments

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
athenaClinicals
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Tebra Billing & Payments
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Tebra Practice Management (formerly Kareo) provides cloud-based management and billing solutions for small medical offices. Some key features include: Patient Management, Scheduler & Patient Reminders, Insurance Billing & Reporting, and Patient Billing & Collections.
$74.50
per provider
Pricing
athenaClinicalsTebra Billing & Payments
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Non-Physician Provider (Low-Volume)
$74.50
per provider
Low-Volume Provider
$149
per provider
Physician Provider
$299
per provider
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
athenaClinicalsTebra Billing & Payments
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
athenaClinicalsTebra Billing & Payments
Features
athenaClinicalsTebra Billing & Payments
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.4
8 Ratings
11% above category average
Tebra Billing & Payments
-
Ratings
Real-time eligibility verification9.38 Ratings00 Ratings
Claims management8.38 Ratings00 Ratings
Coding9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient billing8.38 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Reporting7.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.2
8 Ratings
5% above category average
Tebra Billing & Payments
-
Ratings
Rule-based scheduling7.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated appointment reminders8.38 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated patient check-in8.37 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-location support8.38 Ratings00 Ratings
Calendar interface8.36 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.9
9 Ratings
21% above category average
Tebra Billing & Payments
-
Ratings
Charting / document management8.99 Ratings00 Ratings
Templates8.99 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient portal10.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support8.47 Ratings00 Ratings
Fax integration9.99 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems7.69 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow automation8.89 Ratings00 Ratings
Speech recognition9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization7.29 Ratings00 Ratings
E-prescribing9.99 Ratings00 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.4
9 Ratings
1% above category average
Tebra Billing & Payments
-
Ratings
HIPAA compliance8.39 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based permission levels9.99 Ratings00 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy8.39 Ratings00 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe7.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
athenaClinicals
8.8
9 Ratings
15% above category average
Tebra Billing & Payments
-
Ratings
Task tracking8.39 Ratings00 Ratings
Specialty-specific workflows8.38 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities9.99 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
athenaClinicalsTebra Billing & Payments
Small Businesses
RXNT
RXNT
Score 8.7 out of 10
RXNT
RXNT
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Epic
Epic
Score 8.7 out of 10
Epic
Epic
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
athenaClinicalsTebra Billing & Payments
Likelihood to Recommend
6.8
(9 ratings)
8.9
(16 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
athenaClinicalsTebra Billing & Payments
Likelihood to Recommend
athenahealth
Works well for family med and peds primary care. Would not be well suited to wound healing/hyperbaric medicine practice in current configuration as the specific documentation requirements of wound management and hyperbaric treatments don't mesh well with the layout and forms that I observed.
Read full review
Tebra
In my experience, problems with them adding incorrect fees to pad their bills coupled with their unethical business practices such as locking you out from accessing your EMR at the drop of a hat prevent me from recommending Kareo to any practice. Reliability is paramount. Kareo's use of unethical business practices (locking you out from your EMR or disabling your EMR all together) can result in a physician being sanctioned by the medical board (inappropriate medical record keeping) or financially destroy a small practice leaving them with NO ACCESS to their ERAs/patient billing accounts etc leads me to NOT reccomend their products or doing business with them.
Read full review
Pros
athenahealth
  • Quality programs - able to see what measures are outstanding for the patient
  • Reporting - able to report on multiple financial reports as well as clinical information
  • Standardization of clinical information - the system forces users within the same specialty to use the same templates (as a starting point), therefore it is easier to standardize protocols and treatments of care
Read full review
Tebra
  • Kareo stays up to date on insurance changes which allow for smooth transitions.
  • Kareo asks for feedback and has a place to go and request changes or additions that would make our job easier.
  • I love that you can submit a help ticket or call, if you prefer, with any questions or problems that you may have. They are always very prompt with their follow up.
Read full review
Cons
athenahealth
  • The schedule needs to be improved. You should be able to see the schedule in a day, a week , in a month view and be able to schedule directly from the schedule.
  • It's difficult to name items because they are traditionally corrected very quickly
Read full review
Tebra
  • Where to start...for one, during my start-up with a "success coach" and trust me, I use that term broadly, I had to f/u on every single issue that came up. I was told she was taking care of my electronic lab enrollment, after waiting 3 months and reaching out to my success coach, Kayli, countless times, I only was told when contacted by management that my Quest lab access had been denied after 2 weeks because I was never told to independently create my own account with Kareo- after asking/emailing/calling multiple times trying to figure out the process. So needless to say, I have NO electronic lab access 4 months after signing with Kareo and they are now just starting the process.
  • Prescriptions- I had reached out to Kareo, no exaggeration, over 10 times to figure out why I wasn't receiving prescription refills. Spent countless hours on the phone with "support line" that could never give me an answer- to any question. And never f/u either until I directly insisted to my salesperson to have management contact me directly. I had a patient go to the hospital due to not having their medications because apparently their pharmacy had sent refill prescriptions over 3 times which I never received. Only after talking to management, did they look into further and then inform me that I had 3 locations in the system (?? I have ONE location). They were all prior addresses of offices, one from over 4 years ago. To date, again, 4 months after paying a year up front, I can't receive refill requests. And the solution proposed to me by management was to call my prior EHR and request they delete my prior addresses. And I cannot contact my prior EHR because I was in a large group that restricted the account to only 2 individuals in a group of 18 doctors to even have access to talk to them. So I can't resolve the issue, Kareo after 4 months instructs me to call them myself, and the prior EHR doesn't even recognize I had an account with them because it was under a group practice name.
  • Online booking- I thought this would be an amazingly efficient add-on. What they don't tell you is you can only designate "increments" of appointment times. Kareo will tell you it syncs with your existing schedule so that online bookings are only in vacant time slots. I had new patients selecting a time increment of 15 minutes, existing patients selecting 45 minutes (with a deductible) and any increment over 15 minutes (which the patient can select at their own will, being if you choose 15 min increments, it will offer appointment length for 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min etc with no outline of the appropriate time length) will over-book your schedule. So if you have a 10-10:15 slot, the patient can select a 45 minute appointment that starts at 10 (Because that 15 minute slot is open). But then will overbook the patients at 10:15 and 10:30.
  • It created utter chaos in my practice. My office manager spent more time calling patients to inform them they had booked an inappropriate time increment, they can't book a new appointment for 15 minutes, we don't accept their insurance...the list goes on.
  • There is no way to restrict the increments or who can book an appointment.
  • Messaging- I can't view what incoming messages from patients are sent to whom. And neither can my office manager. And the patient gets to select who to sent the message to, either the "provider" or "location." And 9 times out of 10 they send to the "provider." So as a physician, I am inundated with patient messages simply wanting to book a new appointment or reschedule. As a physician, obviously prioritizing my time is important and my office manager can't view these messages.
  • The list goes on, unfortunately. "A/R" reports only allow them to calculate a theoretical A/R based on your self-pay rates to patients, not individual contracted rates with insurances. So my A/R has an inflated number, which I can't even quantify by how much, because the A/R is based as if every insurance patient paid as a self-pay patient. Seriously, no one thought this through?
  • Can't send multiple controlled scripts at once electronically. Have to enter, go to separate site, enter code, be redirected back to KAreo then re-enter another med, be redirected to separate site, enter code, be redirected...Any other EHR I've ever used (and I've used around 6 between residency and private practice) you could enter multiple Rx, but then check the meds you wanted to send and then enter ONE code for, say, 2 controlled scripts. Kareo, you must enter separate codes one by one.
  • I could go on but will choose to hope for all reading, you get the general point...
Read full review
Usability
athenahealth
Overall the system is good. Actually, this was supposed to be the universal EMR when it came out during the Bush administration.
Read full review
Tebra
Kareo Medical Billing is very user friendly and the support they provide allows users to get their questions answered quickly and efficiently. The wait time to receive help is usually pretty good and most of the time we can ger our questions answered. We have found that is the tech help is unable to answer our question, they will attempt to find a colleague who is able to help!
Read full review
Support Rating
athenahealth
They are always there. Friendly and organized.
Read full review
Tebra
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
athenahealth
For a surgery center application, it is much better to use a system that is uniquely designed for surgery centers. Using Athena as a less than desirable work around has been a frustrating experience.
Read full review
Tebra
We have used several Practice Management programs which our doctors have chosen. Kareo is far above those in ease of use, efficiency and reporting. Training takes very little time as the program is intuitive. Licensing cost is reasonable. Our doctors enjoy the integration with the Kareo EHR and our staff appreciates the integration from the EHR to the practice management. It makes their job easier.
Read full review
Return on Investment
athenahealth
No answers on this topic
Tebra
  • Kareo had an overall low return on investment.
  • Despite the software being active at our company, we were forced to transition to a different solution within 6-months of implementation.
  • The time spent attempting to reconcile the system to itself was rather wasteful.
Read full review
ScreenShots