Atlassian Confluence vs. KGNN

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Confluence
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Confluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.
$6.40
per month per user
KGNN
Score 0.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Equitus KGNN is an automated data unification platform in the knowledge graph and AI data infrastructure category. It is designed for enterprise organizations seeking to ingest, structure, and contextualize large volumes of structured and unstructured data without relying on traditional ETL processes. KGNN automates the transformation of disparate enterprise data into semantically enriched, AI-ready knowledge to support use cases such as analytics, business intelligence (BI), and generative…N/A
Pricing
Atlassian ConfluenceKGNN
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Free for 10 Users
Standard
$6.40
per month per user
Premium
$12.30
per month per user
Data Center
220,000.00
40,001+ Users - Annually
Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConfluenceKGNN
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPrices shown here reflect prices for deployments with 100 users or less. The prices decrease wien the user base surpasses 100.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian ConfluenceKGNN
Features
Atlassian ConfluenceKGNN
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.1
158 Ratings
9% below category average
KGNN
-
Ratings
Task Management7.2127 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.912 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling7.221 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation6.591 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access6.9118 Ratings00 Ratings
Search7.0157 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.2127 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.9
158 Ratings
1% below category average
KGNN
-
Ratings
Chat6.415 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications8.2156 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions7.9149 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys7.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase9.0150 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts9.37 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.610 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.7
157 Ratings
4% below category average
KGNN
-
Ratings
Versioning8.2137 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files6.9105 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files6.997 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration8.4153 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control8.7148 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features8.3115 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive5.947 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync8.486 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Atlassian ConfluenceKGNN
Small Businesses
Kintone
Kintone
Score 9.7 out of 10
Front
Front
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Kintone
Kintone
Score 9.7 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian ConfluenceKGNN
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(174 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.5
(22 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(63 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.4
(25 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.8
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian ConfluenceKGNN
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
It is well suited due to the below reasons 1. Easy collaboration between teams 2. Strong integration with other applications 3. Centralized documentation among teams and within the organisation 4. Project planning and report sharing 5. Employee onboarding is easier and maintain HR policies very well. Less appropriate in below scenarios When this is being used as a main tool for communication rather than its purpose of collaboration.
Read full review
Equitus
No answers on this topic
Pros
Atlassian
  • Cross product linking - If you use other Atlassian products then Atlassian Confluence is a no-brainer for your source of documentation, knowledge management etc. You can show previews of the linked asset natively E.g. showing a preview of a JIRA ticket in a Atlassian Confluence page.
  • Simple editing - Though the features available may not be super complex right now, this does come with the benefit of making it easy to edit and create documents. Some documentation editors can be overwhelming, Atlassian Confluence is simple and intuitive.
  • Native marketplace - If you want to install add-ons to your Atlassian Confluence space it's really easy. Admins can explore the Atlassian marketplace natively and install them to your instance in a few clicks. You can customise your Atlassian Confluence instance in many different ways using add-ons.
Read full review
Equitus
No answers on this topic
Cons
Atlassian
  • UI Design is very simplistic and basic could make use of more visually interesting colour choices, layout choices, etc.
  • Under the 'Content' menu, it defaults to having a landing page for all L1 and L2 category pages. Meaning as long as the broader content category has a sub-category, it still creates a separate landing page. In my team's case, this often creates blank pages, as we only fill out the page at the lowest sub-category (L3).
  • Hyperlinks are traditionally shown as blue, however, this results into very monotonously blue pages in cases where a lot of information is being linked.
Read full review
Equitus
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
I am confident that Atlassian can come with additional and innovative macros and functions to add value to Confluence. In 6 months, Atlassian transformed a good collaborative tools into a more comprehensive system that can help manage projects and processes, as well as "talk" with other Atlassian products like Jira. We are in fact learning more about Jira to evaluate a possible fit to complement our tool box.
Read full review
Equitus
No answers on this topic
Usability
Atlassian
Atlassian Confluence is a great tool for project management, especially for internal documentation. It has a minimum governance requirement to use its full power. Also, it is a little pricy to unlock its full power as well, so it is not recommended for companies with a low budget in my opinion.
Read full review
Equitus
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Atlassian
I do not recall having outages or applications error so far, very reliable and available.
Read full review
Equitus
No answers on this topic
Performance
Atlassian
We never worked against the tide while using Confluence. Everything loads considerably fast, even media components like videos (hosted on the platform or embed external videos from Youtube, for example). We are not using heavy media components a lot, but in the rare occasion we happen to use one we have no problems whatsoever.
Read full review
Equitus
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Atlassian
This rating is specifically for Atlassian's self-help documentation on their website. Often times, it is not robust enough to cover a complex usage of one of their features. Frequently, you can find an answer on the web, but not from Atlassian. Instead, it is usually at a power user group elsewhere on the net.
Read full review
Equitus
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Atlassian
Overall, I am very satisfied with the initial implementation (and the subsequent upgrades and implementations made over the years).
This product has never rose to the level of being an major issue at an executive level. It has quietly and valiantly done it's job for our company!
Read full review
Equitus
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
We chose Atlassian Confluence over SharePoint because it's much more user-friendly and intuitive. Atlassian Confluence makes collaboration and knowledge sharing easier with its simpler interface and better search. While SharePoint can be powerful, it often feels clunky and complex, making it harder for our team to actually use it.
Read full review
Equitus
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Atlassian
This tool is very adaptable. So much so we use it for three completely separate projects, in three very different ways.
Read full review
Equitus
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • We totally rely on this tool since a decade now and despite being so much transition in our company it has served us well in those transitions
  • Many times, during security audits we are asked to showcase our readiness for various compliance points and confluence helps us a lot in maintaining that
  • Talking about Confluence in front of clients and customers gives us an upper hand that we are up to date with latest trend and technologies and tools for our RnD planning and management
Read full review
Equitus
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

KGNN Screenshots

Screenshot of KGNN displaying a richly connected semantic network generated by Equitus KGNN. At the center is a core entity node, automatically linked to multiple other entity types such as people, organizations, locations, and categories. These nodes are color-coded and icon-tagged to represent different entity classes.Screenshot of an image where the user is selecting from a variety of layout modes, Concentric, Lens, Sequential, Organic, and Structural, each offering different visual perspectives to better understand the graph’s structure. The central workspace displays a dynamically generated graph consisting of nodes (entities) and links (relationships), color-coded by type or category. Users can manipulate the graph view, search items, group nodes, add documents, run queries, or export the graph data for further analysis.Screenshot of Equitus's integrated UI, which is designed to visualize and interact with the knowledge graph automatically generated by KGNN. The interfae is not required for KGNN to function but offers a powerful, intuitive environment for users who wish to explore and validate semantic relationships within the graph.Screenshot of the interface that enhances transparency and usability of the knowledge graph, especially in environments where data traceability, context validation, or manual exploration is necessary.