Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro vs. NoteVault

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro (formerly BIM360) is a construction software for project managers, site managers, and Building Information Modelling (BIM) managers. It is designed to connect the office and site components of construction, providing cloud-based access to plans and models.
$480
per user/per year
NoteVault
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
NoteVault is a construction reporting tool with three components. The Notes! app is supported by an audio-to-text translation service, and the Crew! app allows users to track labor, materials, and equipment quantities. The AlertMe! app supports group calls for issue notification.N/A
Pricing
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProNoteVault
Editions & Modules
Autodesk Bim 360
$480.00
per user/per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProNoteVault
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProNoteVault
Considered Both Products
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Storing and managing the project data in one location is not different that Autodesk Vault which is also a data management software. However, Autodesk Vault is slow in accessing and dealing with big Revit projects and files. Even if they are similar, we decided to use only …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
I have never used anything against BIM Collaborate, as it's our primary collaboration domain.
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
This software streamlines BIM project workflows better than other software. It Saves time, reduces risk, and mitigates errors in construction projects. It will Help to improve quality & safety. The feature of clash detection is the best one and most useful. This software will …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Personally I prefer Procore for reviewing submittals and other documentation for LEED purposes only because that platform holds more of the information we are looking for like drawings as well, all in one place. Newforma has been used from time to time, but Autodesk is …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
They are all very similar. It seems that Bim360 is easier to manage from the front end, which results in a better experience for all of the end users.
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Integration with glue and field is the primary reason why Docs is better than PlanGrid. I would like for them to remove those silos however and have it under one platform. Unfortunately, it seems like Autodesk swallows up all the small companies so you are more likely to have …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Bim360 is an immature, oversold, and under-delivered product that is simply the only option available for collaboration when you are locked into the Autodesk Revit ecosystem. SharePoint Online, Dropbox Business, and other cloud file management and sharing solutions show you …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
The saving in reduced field changes/mistakes quickly paid for the license plus some. The software allows for easy data collection, especially at project completion for field software by checklist creation. Furthermore, the internal punch-list tracking, tracking completion lists …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
BIM360 serves us better for live collaboration than any other product. Because it is under the Autodesk umbrella it is compatible with Revit and AutoCAD MEP and Civil 3D. Unlike the other software where the data sharing is a static process. We went with BIM360 ultimately for …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
We chose Bim360 because it has a dashboard interface and friendly UI to organize data and documents.
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Bim360 is a CDE in the overall BIM softwares from Autodesk. If you are using Revit, Navisworks or Building design suite from Autodesk, it's highly recommended that Bim360 be the CDE of choice to get your project into BIM technology.
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
BIM360 compared to prolog is comparing apples and oranges. We used these programs to do things the other could not. We used Prolog to handle bids, budget and change orders. While BIM360 we thought was not set up to easily do those options so we used BIM for drawings, …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
I think BIM360 has much better quality control tools that are much more streamlined than what is available on Procore. However the RFI, Submittal, Drawings tools in Procore are much easier to use and the drawings are much easier to access and view in the field using Procore. …
NoteVault
Chose NoteVault
Notevault is who we decided to use, for the simple fact that it is the easiest on the market for our foremen to use. Make it easy, and they'll actually do it. Make it bulky and cumbersome, and they'll do a way less accurate job of daily reporting. This is why Notevault works …
Chose NoteVault
I have used both Raken and NoteVault. It is my preference to use NoteVault due to the simplicity of it. Raken tended to be a bit cumbersome. I did not like the photo features used with Raken as opposed to the very simple straight forward approach with NoteVault.
Chose NoteVault
I have not found another program that can do or offers what Notevault does for our company. We like to be on the cutting edge of tech for our industry by investing in the best processes as they become available, but I simply have not found anything comparable to notevault at …
Chose NoteVault
I have not used other products similar to NoteVault
Chose NoteVault
As a company, we relied on Word document as our daily report. We do not have any other products to evaluate against.
Chose NoteVault
We could use the daily report feature in our current project management software, but it doesn't have any many features. NoteVault is a no-brainer.
Features
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProNoteVault
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.0
Ratings
12% below category average
NoteVault
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.2
Ratings
21% below category average
NoteVault
-
Ratings
Dashboards4.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Data exportability7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.9
Ratings
7% below category average
NoteVault
9.1
Ratings
20% above category average
Plan distribution & viewing9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation5.40 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Jobsite reports4.50 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Document sharing10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools4.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
As-built drawings4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Submittal design and management6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Checklists4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Specifications5.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Change orders8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
4.3
Ratings
55% below category average
NoteVault
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Job costing3.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost databases8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost calculator2.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Bid creation3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProNoteVault
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 1.4 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 1.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProNoteVault
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProNoteVault
Likelihood to Recommend
It is very efficient to set up projects using configurable templates for files, issues, and roles. Data management is easy to be understood by many users. As we have multiple users that are located in different areas in the world, it allows managing multi-discipline teams in only one environment. Clash analysis on shared models saves us time too.
Read full review
NoteVault helps to reduce the amount of time to produce a daily report and makes the typically burdensome task easier to accomplish. Our Superintendents are able to craft their daily reports as they see the work activities being performed as opposed to trying to remember what happened during the day and then writing down those activities with accuracy after a long day in the field. NoteVault also allows our Superintendents to keep accurate manpower counts, material deliveries, equipment on site and weather reports.
Read full review
Pros
  • Live updates between design teams. This keeps the team up to date for quicker design and frees up personnel from having to do file transfers.
  • The cloud-based platform gives your company a little bit of a break on computer requirements.
  • Allows multiple offices and/or cloud-based consultants to collaborate on a design as if they are one office or one company.
Read full review
  • Enhances safety; instead of writing notes, with my head down buried in a notebook, I am aware and looking around. I work on highway repair projects next to live traffic and all types of construction equipment moving in all directions and overhead.
  • Documentation; I got in a dispute with a contractor recently and won it immediately by showing my Notevault notes with time stamped photos of the disputed work.
  • Communication; I can keep other support staff back in the home office up to date with project developments and they get to see what is going on .
Read full review
Cons
  • Bim360 is extremely unintuitive and frequently confusing to end users.
  • There are multiple avenues of sharing and collaboration for models and information. The advantages/disadvantages of each and how to perform even the most basic of tasks requires extensive training and mentoring for even the most advanced of users.
  • There are many enormous limitations and constraints to BIM 360 that are not immediately obvious and even contrary to published marketing materials and even product naming.
  • Development cycles of the product are seemingly monthly, but incredibly minor. This makes the desperately-needed and glaringly obvious massive usability, capability, and performance improvements into deal-breakers and hair pulling events. Change cannot come fast enough.
  • There are no integrations into Microsoft's Azure AD SSO or other 3rd party SSOs available for SMBs. This makes the provided MFA a huge headache for all SMBs.
  • There are no integrations into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for SharePoint/OneDrive or Outlook. This is desperately needed for most organizations using Bim360.
Read full review
  • The website for administrators setting up projects and users could be improved. It's hard to find where things are located. I would like it in more of a Office (Word) template, with tabs up top. Some things are in Settings, some are in tabs, some are on the right side.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It flat works and has paid for itself quickly.
Read full review
Usability
It's not very difficult to use for majority of all our users. We really like storing and managing all our project data in one location so users have only one option to access the requested information. Managing our architectural engineering projects with two workflows in one system is really a good asset
Read full review
Simple use of functions. Majority of people can become familiar with this product fairly quick
Read full review
Support Rating
AutoDesk support is slow and if you are not an enterprise customer they will likely tell you to go to forums and post for help pushing the support on the high-level end-users (some of which are AutoDesk employees). I haven't actually had issues requiring support with docs altough there are some features I wish it had
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Personally I prefer Procore for reviewing submittals and other documentation for LEED purposes only because that platform holds more of the information we are looking for like drawings as well, all in one place. Newforma has been used from time to time, but Autodesk is preffered to that because of its straightforward nature. Overall, we use the platform that our projects are already using, but they do make a small difference in the time and effectiveness of which we are able to do our job as consultants.
Read full review
Notevault is who we decided to use, for the simple fact that it is the easiest on the market for our foremen to use. Make it easy, and they'll actually do it. Make it bulky and cumbersome, and they'll do a way less accurate job of daily reporting. This is why Notevault works for us... IT'S EASY!!
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Well, I would say it's helpful for me to exchange different models with different specifications.
  • Number of people can work and also characterized models based on its modelling.
  • Even if a number of people are working, none of the models get disturbed, which is one of the most important points of BIM.
Read full review
  • It has made it easy for our guys out in the filed to report all that is needed for daily reports so there is no scrabbling to remember and report at a later time.
  • NoteVault has had no negative impact for us at all.
Read full review
ScreenShots