The Autodesk Construction Cloud provides a bundle of construction management products to suite various use cases. Current bundles include Construction Operations, Preconstruction, as well as Virtual Design and Construction.
N/A
Box
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Box is an online Intelligent Content Management solution that caters to individual users as well as businesses.
$21
per month 3 users (minimum)
Pricing
Autodesk Construction Cloud
Box
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Business Starter
$7
per month per user (3 minimum)
Business
$20
per month per user (3 minimum)
Business Plus
$33
per month per user (3 minimum)
Enterprise
$47
per month per user (3 minimum)
Enterprise Plus
$50
per month (billed annually) per user (3 minimum)
Enterprise Advanced
Contact us
per month per user (35 minimum)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autodesk Construction Cloud
Box
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
A discount is available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk Construction Cloud
Box
Features
Autodesk Construction Cloud
Box
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk Construction Cloud
4.6
4 Ratings
42% below category average
Box
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
3.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
3.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
5.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
3.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
4.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
5.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
5.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk Construction Cloud
3.6
3 Ratings
61% below category average
Box
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
3.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
3.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
3.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
3.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
3.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
3.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
3.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk Construction Cloud
5.4
4 Ratings
23% below category average
Box
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
5.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk Construction Cloud
6.9
5 Ratings
10% below category average
Box
-
Ratings
Dashboards
6.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
6.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk Construction Cloud
7.5
8 Ratings
1% above category average
Box
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
7.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
7.18 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
7.27 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
7.46 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
8.68 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
8.67 Ratings
00 Ratings
As-built drawings
6.26 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
6.26 Ratings
00 Ratings
Submittal design and management
7.88 Ratings
00 Ratings
Checklists
7.87 Ratings
00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
8.26 Ratings
00 Ratings
Specifications
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change orders
7.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk Construction Cloud
5.5
3 Ratings
32% below category average
Box
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools
5.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job costing
5.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost databases
5.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost calculator
5.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bid creation
6.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk Construction Cloud
-
Ratings
Box
7.6
26 Ratings
6% below category average
Content capture & imaging
00 Ratings
8.119 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving
00 Ratings
9.725 Ratings
Document management
00 Ratings
8.324 Ratings
Records management
00 Ratings
7.020 Ratings
Content search & retrieval
00 Ratings
8.224 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration
00 Ratings
8.021 Ratings
Content publishing & creation
00 Ratings
5.015 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance
Well Suited: Autodesk Construction Cloud is cost effective, user friendly, and robust. They aren't nickel and diming you for use of each module. Once users are on-board with the system it creates an ecosystem that all users "go to first" for an answer. Less Appropriate: As a Developer, there are some hiccups as it is designed more for the GC (general contractor). A template option that is Developer forward would an improvement.
I think Box is great for research teams or anyone that has a large number of files that need to be securely stored. Particularly in the case of social science research, where it is important to protect identifying data, Box is a great option. In cases where teams need a more reliable means for real-time collaboration, I would probably consider a different alternative
Meeting Minutes: Simple to use and adapt from Agenda to Minutes, attach reference documents efficiently, and assign accountability to attendees.
Budget/Cost Reporting: There is a learning curve, but the visibility of budgets and costs from inception to closeout is beneficial for the user and makes reporting to investors simple and consistent.
Document Management: The version history on drawings "sheets" is very helpful when managing a project through design and construction. Issuing addenda, drawings, or tracking down a change in design is simple.
Pay Applications/Change Order Workflow: the customizable workflows along with time stamps of reviews and response makes tracking down status and bottlenecks very easy.
The main feature that I like the most in Box is that it makes collaboration seamless, workers can easily check the documents any time and make changes according to the needs.
Box manages and backs up all of your files on its cloud servers, and provides a very nice interface for creating, viewing, editing, and collaborating on the most commonly used file types (PDF, XLS, DOC, etc.).
Over the past few years, Box has built on top of its basic cloud storage management with a host of other tools, such as workflows, AI, monitoring, and analytics.
It is helping us to make good connections with clients and our workers themselves as to its syncing and viewing feature to all is very much helpful and easy to go.
The footprint large projects leave within Desktop Connector and Mitigating that data
REMOVE "add up to 80 projects" from the Desktop Connector Select Projects Screen! It is better to cycle the project data in/out for syncing latest greatest rather than have users load up their desktop connector full of projects and let data stagnate/have to be racked to update.
I like the security features and I like the website. It's easy to use and create and move things around as needed. The main reason for a lower rating is because the Box Sync app is just not a good program. It's a memory hog, it's slow, transfer speeds are slow, and it's not the most efficient route. If you have a large Box account and you need to get a computer up to speed on a large amount of data within Box, you are in for the long haul. Last time I had to do this, it took 3 days to sync all of the files and we are talking around 100 GB worth of data
It is overall a very great product in terms of usability. Some features need some work like RFI tools and contruction administration tools. As the product develops I imagine these becoming more important and easier to use
Everything with Box is seamless. It can be integrated into virtually any other software or application. You can even get the app for your phone or tablet to work on the go. File syncing is so quick. The only reason I gave it a 9 is the issue I discussed earlier about the local file application rebooting and not continuing to sync files. Other than that, it's great!
Yeah, it's always worked, I've never had any kind of connection issues, the only issues I've had it I've been on our end when the Internet hasn't worked.
The data mitigation is complete garbage. Any cloud collaborated model takes 2x to load in the Autodesk Construction Cloud environment that if it was saved locally or to on prem servers. We had our systems and bandwidth all evaluated to be applicable but the data downloads and sequencing through Desktop Connector leaves much to be desired.
The general operation and management of Box is very efficient, both when accessing the account, and when adding files, downloading or modifying any document directly. The web platform, mobile and desktop versions work really well and quickly, making all the work and process flow smoothly and without setbacks. So far I have not been able to observe any inconvenience
I found their support community lacking in clarity when I experienced a login issue. The error messaging was poor on my Box Sync application. I did not reach out to support staff for help, instead, I reasoned that I should try downloading the Box Sync application again and reinstall it. That fixed my issue, thankfully. I think a less computer-savvy user would've been much more frustrated.
The documentation is good. Since Box is a popular service, there were also a number of YouTube videos and other sources that were helpful as we were considering the product and planning for deployment. Also, the ability to try the free version helped to prepare us.
Be careful with settings. It is easy to get overwhelmed with updates. For example, you don’t want to be updated when doing historical data uploads. I recommend taking off notifications initially and then turn on post you have done your historical data upload.
Procore's user interface is not as user-friendly. Next steps are not as obvious and the overall graphic design is more old-school. I do however like how Procore lists the specific issues that you are assigned on the home page. Procore can be more difficult to navigate and it's hard to find attachments.
They are kind of the same. And both of them do their job as promised. But for company and project wise I think that Box slightly wins for some points. Which [makes him] win over Google Drive (don't forget that Google Drive is very easy to use and has a lot [of] nice features too).
Box has been an only positive experience. It provides a seamless way for me and my team to collaborate on documents in such a way where we're not sending the document back/forth via email. It's a huge timesaver.
Box reduces the risk of sharing a sensitive document to the wrong person via email.
Box has provided a platform where my team can share notes in meetings - this has helped streamline and organize our meetings. Our meetings are more productive and actionable.